Hao Cui , Zhiheng Du , Lei Wang , Fangping Yan , Wenhan Hu , Simin Xie , Qian Xu , Guojun Han
{"title":"高寒水库CH4和CO2排放的时空变异及其控制:来自刘家峡系统的见解","authors":"Hao Cui , Zhiheng Du , Lei Wang , Fangping Yan , Wenhan Hu , Simin Xie , Qian Xu , Guojun Han","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Alpine reservoirs represent critical but poorly quantified sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from inland waters. This study examines spatiotemporal variations and drivers of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) fluxes in the Liujiaxia (LJX) Reservoir (1735 m a.s.l.), a high-altitude hydropower system in the upper Yellow River, through multi-season field campaigns (2021–2023). High-frequency flux measurements, stable isotope analyses (δ<sup>13</sup>C-CH<sub>4</sub> and δ<sup>13</sup>C-CO<sub>2</sub>), and statistical modeling identified contrasting emission patterns between central and nearshore zones. Ebullition dominated CH<sub>4</sub> emissions (54–86 % of total fluxes), with summer total fluxes surpassing spring and winter levels by factors of 2.8–5.7. Isotopic evidence revealed hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis as the principal pathway in the central zone (α<sub>c</sub> = 1.053 ± 0.01; δ<sup>13</sup>C-CH<sub>4</sub> = −50.19 ± 4.09 ‰), contrasting with acetoclastic dominance in nearshore regions (α<sub>c</sub> = 1.028 ± 0.01; δ<sup>13</sup>C-CH<sub>4</sub> = −65.04 ± 6.38 ‰), implicating sediment-driven methane production. CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes exhibited pronounced seasonality, linked to organic carbon mineralization in nearshore sediments. Hydrological regulation amplified upstream GHG emissions, where CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes exceeded downstream values by 3.7- and 1.8- fold, respectively. A random forest model, informed by high-resolution spatiotemporal flux data, estimated annual emissions of 0.23 Gg CH<sub>4</sub> and 20.18 Gg CO<sub>2</sub>. These findings underscore the significant influence of hydrologic management and biogeochemical processes on GHG budgets in alpine reservoirs, providing essential data to improve global models of inland water emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 114134"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatiotemporal variability and controls of CH4 and CO2 emissions in an alpine reservoir: insights from the Liujiaxia system\",\"authors\":\"Hao Cui , Zhiheng Du , Lei Wang , Fangping Yan , Wenhan Hu , Simin Xie , Qian Xu , Guojun Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Alpine reservoirs represent critical but poorly quantified sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from inland waters. This study examines spatiotemporal variations and drivers of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) fluxes in the Liujiaxia (LJX) Reservoir (1735 m a.s.l.), a high-altitude hydropower system in the upper Yellow River, through multi-season field campaigns (2021–2023). High-frequency flux measurements, stable isotope analyses (δ<sup>13</sup>C-CH<sub>4</sub> and δ<sup>13</sup>C-CO<sub>2</sub>), and statistical modeling identified contrasting emission patterns between central and nearshore zones. Ebullition dominated CH<sub>4</sub> emissions (54–86 % of total fluxes), with summer total fluxes surpassing spring and winter levels by factors of 2.8–5.7. Isotopic evidence revealed hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis as the principal pathway in the central zone (α<sub>c</sub> = 1.053 ± 0.01; δ<sup>13</sup>C-CH<sub>4</sub> = −50.19 ± 4.09 ‰), contrasting with acetoclastic dominance in nearshore regions (α<sub>c</sub> = 1.028 ± 0.01; δ<sup>13</sup>C-CH<sub>4</sub> = −65.04 ± 6.38 ‰), implicating sediment-driven methane production. CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes exhibited pronounced seasonality, linked to organic carbon mineralization in nearshore sediments. Hydrological regulation amplified upstream GHG emissions, where CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes exceeded downstream values by 3.7- and 1.8- fold, respectively. A random forest model, informed by high-resolution spatiotemporal flux data, estimated annual emissions of 0.23 Gg CH<sub>4</sub> and 20.18 Gg CO<sub>2</sub>. These findings underscore the significant influence of hydrologic management and biogeochemical processes on GHG budgets in alpine reservoirs, providing essential data to improve global models of inland water emissions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"179 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25010660\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25010660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Spatiotemporal variability and controls of CH4 and CO2 emissions in an alpine reservoir: insights from the Liujiaxia system
Alpine reservoirs represent critical but poorly quantified sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from inland waters. This study examines spatiotemporal variations and drivers of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes in the Liujiaxia (LJX) Reservoir (1735 m a.s.l.), a high-altitude hydropower system in the upper Yellow River, through multi-season field campaigns (2021–2023). High-frequency flux measurements, stable isotope analyses (δ13C-CH4 and δ13C-CO2), and statistical modeling identified contrasting emission patterns between central and nearshore zones. Ebullition dominated CH4 emissions (54–86 % of total fluxes), with summer total fluxes surpassing spring and winter levels by factors of 2.8–5.7. Isotopic evidence revealed hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis as the principal pathway in the central zone (αc = 1.053 ± 0.01; δ13C-CH4 = −50.19 ± 4.09 ‰), contrasting with acetoclastic dominance in nearshore regions (αc = 1.028 ± 0.01; δ13C-CH4 = −65.04 ± 6.38 ‰), implicating sediment-driven methane production. CO2 fluxes exhibited pronounced seasonality, linked to organic carbon mineralization in nearshore sediments. Hydrological regulation amplified upstream GHG emissions, where CH4 and CO2 fluxes exceeded downstream values by 3.7- and 1.8- fold, respectively. A random forest model, informed by high-resolution spatiotemporal flux data, estimated annual emissions of 0.23 Gg CH4 and 20.18 Gg CO2. These findings underscore the significant influence of hydrologic management and biogeochemical processes on GHG budgets in alpine reservoirs, providing essential data to improve global models of inland water emissions.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.