植物性饮食的血浆蛋白质组:对49615人的2920种蛋白质的分析

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Tammy Y.N. Tong, Karl Smith-Byrne, Keren Papier, Joshua R. Atkins, Mahboubeh Parsaeian, Timothy J. Key, Ruth C. Travis
{"title":"植物性饮食的血浆蛋白质组:对49615人的2920种蛋白质的分析","authors":"Tammy Y.N. Tong,&nbsp;Karl Smith-Byrne,&nbsp;Keren Papier,&nbsp;Joshua R. Atkins,&nbsp;Mahboubeh Parsaeian,&nbsp;Timothy J. Key,&nbsp;Ruth C. Travis","doi":"10.1016/j.clnu.2025.08.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; aims</h3><div>Circulating proteins are integral to many biological processes and could be influenced by diet. We aimed to assess differences in the plasma proteome between people of different dietary groups, defined by degree of animal food consumption.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The UK Biobank recruited middle-aged adults (mostly 40–69 years) throughout the UK between 2006 and 2010. Relative concentrations of 2920 plasma proteins were quantified using the Olink Proximity Extension Assay on blood samples from 49,615 participants, who were also asked to report their ethnicity and consumption of red and processed meat, poultry, fish, dairy and eggs. We defined six diet groups among the white British participants (23,243 regular meat eaters, 23,472 low meat eaters, 486 poultry eaters, 1081 fish eaters, 721 vegetarians, and 54 vegans), and two diet groups among the British Indians (391 meat eaters and 167 vegetarians). We used multivariable-adjusted linear regressions to assess the cross-sectional differences in protein concentrations between diet groups, with correction for multiple testing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We observed significant differences in many plasma proteins by diet group (920 proteins in white British participants, 2 in British Indians). Of the biggest differences, compared with regular meat eaters, the non-meat eaters had significantly higher FGF21 (e.g. +0.40 SD in vegetarians), CKB (+0.34), GUCA2A (+0.33), FOLR1 (+0.32), IGFBP2 (+0.31) and DSG2 (+0.30); all groups except the vegans had lower HAVCR1 (−0.38 in vegetarians). Vegetarians also had significantly lower SELENOP (−0.46), while the vegans had lower FGFBP2 (−0.68). The observed differences were generally similar in direction in both ethnicities.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this first comprehensive assessment of plasma proteins by diet group, we identified many differences in proteins between vegetarians, vegans and meat eaters; this variation in protein levels suggests differences in various biological activities, including gastrointestinal tract and kidney function, which may relate to differences in future disease risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10517,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition","volume":"53 ","pages":"Pages 144-154"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The plasma proteome of plant-based diets: Analyses of 2920 proteins in 49,615 people\",\"authors\":\"Tammy Y.N. Tong,&nbsp;Karl Smith-Byrne,&nbsp;Keren Papier,&nbsp;Joshua R. Atkins,&nbsp;Mahboubeh Parsaeian,&nbsp;Timothy J. Key,&nbsp;Ruth C. Travis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clnu.2025.08.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background &amp; aims</h3><div>Circulating proteins are integral to many biological processes and could be influenced by diet. We aimed to assess differences in the plasma proteome between people of different dietary groups, defined by degree of animal food consumption.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The UK Biobank recruited middle-aged adults (mostly 40–69 years) throughout the UK between 2006 and 2010. Relative concentrations of 2920 plasma proteins were quantified using the Olink Proximity Extension Assay on blood samples from 49,615 participants, who were also asked to report their ethnicity and consumption of red and processed meat, poultry, fish, dairy and eggs. We defined six diet groups among the white British participants (23,243 regular meat eaters, 23,472 low meat eaters, 486 poultry eaters, 1081 fish eaters, 721 vegetarians, and 54 vegans), and two diet groups among the British Indians (391 meat eaters and 167 vegetarians). We used multivariable-adjusted linear regressions to assess the cross-sectional differences in protein concentrations between diet groups, with correction for multiple testing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We observed significant differences in many plasma proteins by diet group (920 proteins in white British participants, 2 in British Indians). Of the biggest differences, compared with regular meat eaters, the non-meat eaters had significantly higher FGF21 (e.g. +0.40 SD in vegetarians), CKB (+0.34), GUCA2A (+0.33), FOLR1 (+0.32), IGFBP2 (+0.31) and DSG2 (+0.30); all groups except the vegans had lower HAVCR1 (−0.38 in vegetarians). Vegetarians also had significantly lower SELENOP (−0.46), while the vegans had lower FGFBP2 (−0.68). The observed differences were generally similar in direction in both ethnicities.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this first comprehensive assessment of plasma proteins by diet group, we identified many differences in proteins between vegetarians, vegans and meat eaters; this variation in protein levels suggests differences in various biological activities, including gastrointestinal tract and kidney function, which may relate to differences in future disease risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical nutrition\",\"volume\":\"53 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 144-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561425002468\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561425002468","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的循环蛋白是许多生物过程的组成部分,并可能受到饮食的影响。我们的目的是评估不同饮食组之间血浆蛋白质组的差异,根据动物性食物消费的程度来定义。方法英国生物银行在2006年至2010年间招募了全英国的中年人(主要是40-69岁)。2920种血浆蛋白的相对浓度通过Olink接近扩展测定法对49,615名参与者的血液样本进行了量化,这些参与者还被要求报告他们的种族以及红肉和加工肉、家禽、鱼、乳制品和鸡蛋的消费量。我们在英国白人参与者中定义了六个饮食组(23,243名经常肉食者,23,472名低肉食者,486名家禽食用者,1081名鱼食用者,721名素食者和54名纯素食者),在英属印度人中定义了两个饮食组(391名肉食者和167名素食者)。我们使用多变量调整线性回归来评估饮食组之间蛋白质浓度的横截面差异,并对多重测试进行校正。结果我们观察到不同饮食组的血浆蛋白有显著差异(白种英国人有920种蛋白,英裔印度人有2种)。在最大的差异中,与经常吃肉的人相比,非肉食者的FGF21(例如素食者的+0.40 SD)、CKB(+0.34)、GUCA2A(+0.33)、FOLR1(+0.32)、IGFBP2(+0.31)和DSG2(+0.30)显著更高;除纯素食者外,所有组的HAVCR1均较低(素食者为- 0.38)。素食者的SELENOP也显著降低(- 0.46),而纯素食者的FGFBP2也显著降低(- 0.68)。在两个种族中观察到的差异在方向上大致相似。结论通过对不同饮食组血浆蛋白的首次综合评估,我们发现素食者、纯素食者和肉食者之间的蛋白质存在许多差异;蛋白质水平的这种变化表明各种生物活动的差异,包括胃肠道和肾脏功能,这可能与未来疾病风险的差异有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The plasma proteome of plant-based diets: Analyses of 2920 proteins in 49,615 people

Background & aims

Circulating proteins are integral to many biological processes and could be influenced by diet. We aimed to assess differences in the plasma proteome between people of different dietary groups, defined by degree of animal food consumption.

Methods

The UK Biobank recruited middle-aged adults (mostly 40–69 years) throughout the UK between 2006 and 2010. Relative concentrations of 2920 plasma proteins were quantified using the Olink Proximity Extension Assay on blood samples from 49,615 participants, who were also asked to report their ethnicity and consumption of red and processed meat, poultry, fish, dairy and eggs. We defined six diet groups among the white British participants (23,243 regular meat eaters, 23,472 low meat eaters, 486 poultry eaters, 1081 fish eaters, 721 vegetarians, and 54 vegans), and two diet groups among the British Indians (391 meat eaters and 167 vegetarians). We used multivariable-adjusted linear regressions to assess the cross-sectional differences in protein concentrations between diet groups, with correction for multiple testing.

Results

We observed significant differences in many plasma proteins by diet group (920 proteins in white British participants, 2 in British Indians). Of the biggest differences, compared with regular meat eaters, the non-meat eaters had significantly higher FGF21 (e.g. +0.40 SD in vegetarians), CKB (+0.34), GUCA2A (+0.33), FOLR1 (+0.32), IGFBP2 (+0.31) and DSG2 (+0.30); all groups except the vegans had lower HAVCR1 (−0.38 in vegetarians). Vegetarians also had significantly lower SELENOP (−0.46), while the vegans had lower FGFBP2 (−0.68). The observed differences were generally similar in direction in both ethnicities.

Conclusions

In this first comprehensive assessment of plasma proteins by diet group, we identified many differences in proteins between vegetarians, vegans and meat eaters; this variation in protein levels suggests differences in various biological activities, including gastrointestinal tract and kidney function, which may relate to differences in future disease risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition
Clinical nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.30%
发文量
356
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition, the official journal of ESPEN, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, is an international journal providing essential scientific information on nutritional and metabolic care and the relationship between nutrition and disease both in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Published bi-monthly, each issue combines original articles and reviews providing an invaluable reference for any specialist concerned with these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信