砌体重力结构的推力布局

IF 3.8 3区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS
K. Isuru U. Nanayakkara , Andrew Liew , Matthew Gilbert
{"title":"砌体重力结构的推力布局","authors":"K. Isuru U. Nanayakkara ,&nbsp;Andrew Liew ,&nbsp;Matthew Gilbert","doi":"10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Heyman’s ‘safe theorem’ is widely used to assess the safety of masonry gravity structures. In its original incarnation, a funicular thrust line — i.e., a hanging chain — was used to represent a possible flow of forces through a structure, though this was later found to be problematic in some cases. Following the work of Moseley, a line of resistance has also been used as a representation of a thrust line. However, although this provides a valid representation of equilibrium, it does not facilitate clear visualization of a flow of forces within a structure, making it less intuitive than a funicular thrust line. To address shortcomings associated with funicular thrust lines, the notion of a ‘thrust layout’ is also considered here. This can accurately represent a state of equilibrium while also enabling visualization of the flow of forces. Thrust layouts also allow explicit consideration of the tensile forces that can (or cannot) be reasonably sustained in a masonry construction, such as within constituent blocks but not across weak joints.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Solids and Structures","volume":"323 ","pages":"Article 113593"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thrust layouts in masonry gravity structures\",\"authors\":\"K. Isuru U. Nanayakkara ,&nbsp;Andrew Liew ,&nbsp;Matthew Gilbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Heyman’s ‘safe theorem’ is widely used to assess the safety of masonry gravity structures. In its original incarnation, a funicular thrust line — i.e., a hanging chain — was used to represent a possible flow of forces through a structure, though this was later found to be problematic in some cases. Following the work of Moseley, a line of resistance has also been used as a representation of a thrust line. However, although this provides a valid representation of equilibrium, it does not facilitate clear visualization of a flow of forces within a structure, making it less intuitive than a funicular thrust line. To address shortcomings associated with funicular thrust lines, the notion of a ‘thrust layout’ is also considered here. This can accurately represent a state of equilibrium while also enabling visualization of the flow of forces. Thrust layouts also allow explicit consideration of the tensile forces that can (or cannot) be reasonably sustained in a masonry construction, such as within constituent blocks but not across weak joints.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Solids and Structures\",\"volume\":\"323 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113593\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Solids and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020768325003798\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Solids and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020768325003798","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海曼“安全定理”被广泛用于砌体重力结构的安全性评价。在其最初的化身中,索索推力线(即悬挂链)被用来表示通过结构的可能的力流,尽管后来发现在某些情况下这是有问题的。根据莫斯利的工作,阻力线也被用来表示推力线。然而,尽管这提供了平衡的有效表示,但它不能促进结构内力流的清晰可视化,使其不如索索推力线直观。为了解决缆索推力线的缺点,这里还考虑了“推力布局”的概念。这可以准确地表示平衡状态,同时也使力的流动可视化。推力布局还允许明确考虑在砌体结构中可以(或不能)合理承受的拉力,例如在组成块内,但不能跨越薄弱的接缝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thrust layouts in masonry gravity structures
Heyman’s ‘safe theorem’ is widely used to assess the safety of masonry gravity structures. In its original incarnation, a funicular thrust line — i.e., a hanging chain — was used to represent a possible flow of forces through a structure, though this was later found to be problematic in some cases. Following the work of Moseley, a line of resistance has also been used as a representation of a thrust line. However, although this provides a valid representation of equilibrium, it does not facilitate clear visualization of a flow of forces within a structure, making it less intuitive than a funicular thrust line. To address shortcomings associated with funicular thrust lines, the notion of a ‘thrust layout’ is also considered here. This can accurately represent a state of equilibrium while also enabling visualization of the flow of forces. Thrust layouts also allow explicit consideration of the tensile forces that can (or cannot) be reasonably sustained in a masonry construction, such as within constituent blocks but not across weak joints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
405
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Solids and Structures has as its objective the publication and dissemination of original research in Mechanics of Solids and Structures as a field of Applied Science and Engineering. It fosters thus the exchange of ideas among workers in different parts of the world and also among workers who emphasize different aspects of the foundations and applications of the field. Standing as it does at the cross-roads of Materials Science, Life Sciences, Mathematics, Physics and Engineering Design, the Mechanics of Solids and Structures is experiencing considerable growth as a result of recent technological advances. The Journal, by providing an international medium of communication, is encouraging this growth and is encompassing all aspects of the field from the more classical problems of structural analysis to mechanics of solids continually interacting with other media and including fracture, flow, wave propagation, heat transfer, thermal effects in solids, optimum design methods, model analysis, structural topology and numerical techniques. Interest extends to both inorganic and organic solids and structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信