{"title":"从系统综述看前体与罕见事件的新视角","authors":"He Wen","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Estimating the probability of ultra-rare but catastrophic events, such as core melts, offshore blowouts, or chemical explosions, poses a fundamental challenge due to the lack of observed failures. To overcome this “zero-failure dilemma,” safety researchers have turned to accident precursors: abnormal conditions that share causal pathways with potential disasters. This paper presents the first cross-sector systematic review of 72 peer-reviewed studies on precursor-based probability estimation, spanning nuclear, chemical, offshore, rail, and autonomous systems. This study classifies existing methods into four methodological families, including frequency-based rules, Bayesian estimators, Accident Sequence Precursor (ASP) logic trees, and Bayesian networks (BNs). Moreover, to address key gaps such as multi-precursor interaction and recurrence modeling, this study proposes a novel Logistic–Exponential (LE) framework. This model captures how accident risk grows with increasing types of precursors and how repeated signals contribute less over time, using a compact and analytically manageable form. This study concludes by identifying future research directions to improve the model's interpretability, cross-domain applicability, and potential for integration into real-time safety monitoring systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 105785"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new perspective on precursors and rare events from a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"He Wen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Estimating the probability of ultra-rare but catastrophic events, such as core melts, offshore blowouts, or chemical explosions, poses a fundamental challenge due to the lack of observed failures. To overcome this “zero-failure dilemma,” safety researchers have turned to accident precursors: abnormal conditions that share causal pathways with potential disasters. This paper presents the first cross-sector systematic review of 72 peer-reviewed studies on precursor-based probability estimation, spanning nuclear, chemical, offshore, rail, and autonomous systems. This study classifies existing methods into four methodological families, including frequency-based rules, Bayesian estimators, Accident Sequence Precursor (ASP) logic trees, and Bayesian networks (BNs). Moreover, to address key gaps such as multi-precursor interaction and recurrence modeling, this study proposes a novel Logistic–Exponential (LE) framework. This model captures how accident risk grows with increasing types of precursors and how repeated signals contribute less over time, using a compact and analytically manageable form. This study concludes by identifying future research directions to improve the model's interpretability, cross-domain applicability, and potential for integration into real-time safety monitoring systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423025002438\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423025002438","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A new perspective on precursors and rare events from a systematic review
Estimating the probability of ultra-rare but catastrophic events, such as core melts, offshore blowouts, or chemical explosions, poses a fundamental challenge due to the lack of observed failures. To overcome this “zero-failure dilemma,” safety researchers have turned to accident precursors: abnormal conditions that share causal pathways with potential disasters. This paper presents the first cross-sector systematic review of 72 peer-reviewed studies on precursor-based probability estimation, spanning nuclear, chemical, offshore, rail, and autonomous systems. This study classifies existing methods into four methodological families, including frequency-based rules, Bayesian estimators, Accident Sequence Precursor (ASP) logic trees, and Bayesian networks (BNs). Moreover, to address key gaps such as multi-precursor interaction and recurrence modeling, this study proposes a novel Logistic–Exponential (LE) framework. This model captures how accident risk grows with increasing types of precursors and how repeated signals contribute less over time, using a compact and analytically manageable form. This study concludes by identifying future research directions to improve the model's interpretability, cross-domain applicability, and potential for integration into real-time safety monitoring systems.
期刊介绍:
The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.