模拟在全尺寸喷射火灾暴露时工业绝热材料的击穿

IF 4.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Amalie Gunnarshaug , Torgrim Log , Maria-Monika Metallinou
{"title":"模拟在全尺寸喷射火灾暴露时工业绝热材料的击穿","authors":"Amalie Gunnarshaug ,&nbsp;Torgrim Log ,&nbsp;Maria-Monika Metallinou","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Equipment and piping containing pressurized flammable gases and liquids represent a significant hazard when exposed to jet fires. To prevent escalation, thermal insulation is often combined with a layer of passive fire protection (PFP). Previous small-scale jet fire tests of thermally insulated steel structures indicated that the insulation alone, during exposure to temperatures above 1200 °C, could keep the temperature of the steel below 400 °C for at least 20 min. In the present study, full-scale jet fire exposure was modelled. The set-up included a 6″ pipe, 25 mm air gap, thermal insulation and a weather protective cladding. Thus, the article presents the numerical model including thermal insulation break down, alone or combined with layers of PFP. The modelled results were compared to results from a full-scale jet fire test of a thermally insulated pipe. The agreement between modelling and the full-scale jet fire test was quite good considering the variations along the tested pipe. The modelling does, however, show that small variations in the properties of the thermal insulation can result in major differences when exposed to jet fire conditions. Horizontal shrinkage, creating gaps in the insulation was the prevailing degradation mechanism for temperatures above 1100 °C. Oven testing of 50 mm cubic insulation specimens, proved to be useful for evaluating the thermal insulation behavior and improving the numerical model. Modelling showed that adding a 25 mm layer of PFP just beneath the weather cladding significantly improved the situation. This should be confirmed in a full-scale jet fire test.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 105766"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling breakdown of industrial thermal insulation during full-scale jet fire exposure\",\"authors\":\"Amalie Gunnarshaug ,&nbsp;Torgrim Log ,&nbsp;Maria-Monika Metallinou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Equipment and piping containing pressurized flammable gases and liquids represent a significant hazard when exposed to jet fires. To prevent escalation, thermal insulation is often combined with a layer of passive fire protection (PFP). Previous small-scale jet fire tests of thermally insulated steel structures indicated that the insulation alone, during exposure to temperatures above 1200 °C, could keep the temperature of the steel below 400 °C for at least 20 min. In the present study, full-scale jet fire exposure was modelled. The set-up included a 6″ pipe, 25 mm air gap, thermal insulation and a weather protective cladding. Thus, the article presents the numerical model including thermal insulation break down, alone or combined with layers of PFP. The modelled results were compared to results from a full-scale jet fire test of a thermally insulated pipe. The agreement between modelling and the full-scale jet fire test was quite good considering the variations along the tested pipe. The modelling does, however, show that small variations in the properties of the thermal insulation can result in major differences when exposed to jet fire conditions. Horizontal shrinkage, creating gaps in the insulation was the prevailing degradation mechanism for temperatures above 1100 °C. Oven testing of 50 mm cubic insulation specimens, proved to be useful for evaluating the thermal insulation behavior and improving the numerical model. Modelling showed that adding a 25 mm layer of PFP just beneath the weather cladding significantly improved the situation. This should be confirmed in a full-scale jet fire test.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105766\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423025002244\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423025002244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

含有加压可燃气体和液体的设备和管道在暴露于喷射火灾时具有重大危险。为了防止升级,隔热层通常与被动防火层(PFP)相结合。先前对隔热钢结构进行的小规模喷射火灾试验表明,在1200°C以上的温度下,仅隔热材料就可以将钢的温度保持在400°C以下至少20分钟。在本研究中,模拟了全尺寸喷射火灾暴露。设置包括6″管道,25毫米的气隙,隔热层和天气防护包层。因此,本文提出了包括保温层击穿、单独或与PFP层结合的数值模型。模拟结果与绝热管道的全尺寸喷射火测试结果进行了比较。考虑到沿测试管道的变化,模型和全尺寸喷射火试验之间的一致性相当好。然而,该模型确实表明,当暴露在喷射火灾条件下时,隔热材料性能的微小变化会导致重大差异。在1100℃以上的温度下,水平收缩,在绝缘材料中产生空隙是主要的降解机制。对50mm立方绝热材料试样进行了炉内试验,对评价绝热性能和改进数值模型具有重要意义。模型显示,在天气覆层下方添加25毫米的PFP层可以显著改善这种情况。这应该在一次全尺寸喷射射击试验中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modelling breakdown of industrial thermal insulation during full-scale jet fire exposure
Equipment and piping containing pressurized flammable gases and liquids represent a significant hazard when exposed to jet fires. To prevent escalation, thermal insulation is often combined with a layer of passive fire protection (PFP). Previous small-scale jet fire tests of thermally insulated steel structures indicated that the insulation alone, during exposure to temperatures above 1200 °C, could keep the temperature of the steel below 400 °C for at least 20 min. In the present study, full-scale jet fire exposure was modelled. The set-up included a 6″ pipe, 25 mm air gap, thermal insulation and a weather protective cladding. Thus, the article presents the numerical model including thermal insulation break down, alone or combined with layers of PFP. The modelled results were compared to results from a full-scale jet fire test of a thermally insulated pipe. The agreement between modelling and the full-scale jet fire test was quite good considering the variations along the tested pipe. The modelling does, however, show that small variations in the properties of the thermal insulation can result in major differences when exposed to jet fire conditions. Horizontal shrinkage, creating gaps in the insulation was the prevailing degradation mechanism for temperatures above 1100 °C. Oven testing of 50 mm cubic insulation specimens, proved to be useful for evaluating the thermal insulation behavior and improving the numerical model. Modelling showed that adding a 25 mm layer of PFP just beneath the weather cladding significantly improved the situation. This should be confirmed in a full-scale jet fire test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信