{"title":"社会支持在儿童虐待与成人心血管疾病之间的缓冲作用","authors":"Man-Kit Lei, Rachael Dean Weaver","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Associations between childhood maltreatment and adult cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are well-documented. However, previous research has relied on self-rated health and non-representative cross-sectional data, raising questions about the generalizability of the findings. Moreover, less is known about factors that may buffer the biological embedding of early adversity into health outcomes in adulthood.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study examines whether childhood maltreatment predicts CVD risk in adulthood using objective biomarkers and whether social support buffers this relationship in line with the stress-buffering hypothesis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from 4137 participants in Waves 1, 3, and 5 of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health). Childhood maltreatment and social support were measured using validated scales, and 30-year CVD risk was estimated using the Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Score. Fractional outcome models were used to examine the main and moderating effects, and sensitivity analyses using Heckman selection models were conducted to address potential selection bias.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Childhood maltreatment was significantly related to elevated adult CVD risk, supporting the biological embedding model. In line with the stress-buffering hypothesis, social support moderated this association, buffering the adverse health effects of early maltreatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Findings support the stress-buffering hypothesis and highlight the importance of early social support in mitigating the long-term physiological impact of childhood adversity. Integrating the biological embedding model with the stress-buffering hypothesis can improve understanding of resilience and inform strategies to reduce health disparities rooted in early life experiences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 118530"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The buffering effect of social support on the link between biologically embedded childhood maltreatment and adult cardiovascular disease\",\"authors\":\"Man-Kit Lei, Rachael Dean Weaver\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Associations between childhood maltreatment and adult cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are well-documented. However, previous research has relied on self-rated health and non-representative cross-sectional data, raising questions about the generalizability of the findings. Moreover, less is known about factors that may buffer the biological embedding of early adversity into health outcomes in adulthood.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study examines whether childhood maltreatment predicts CVD risk in adulthood using objective biomarkers and whether social support buffers this relationship in line with the stress-buffering hypothesis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from 4137 participants in Waves 1, 3, and 5 of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health). Childhood maltreatment and social support were measured using validated scales, and 30-year CVD risk was estimated using the Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Score. Fractional outcome models were used to examine the main and moderating effects, and sensitivity analyses using Heckman selection models were conducted to address potential selection bias.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Childhood maltreatment was significantly related to elevated adult CVD risk, supporting the biological embedding model. In line with the stress-buffering hypothesis, social support moderated this association, buffering the adverse health effects of early maltreatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Findings support the stress-buffering hypothesis and highlight the importance of early social support in mitigating the long-term physiological impact of childhood adversity. Integrating the biological embedding model with the stress-buffering hypothesis can improve understanding of resilience and inform strategies to reduce health disparities rooted in early life experiences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"384 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625008615\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625008615","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The buffering effect of social support on the link between biologically embedded childhood maltreatment and adult cardiovascular disease
Introduction
Associations between childhood maltreatment and adult cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are well-documented. However, previous research has relied on self-rated health and non-representative cross-sectional data, raising questions about the generalizability of the findings. Moreover, less is known about factors that may buffer the biological embedding of early adversity into health outcomes in adulthood.
Objective
This study examines whether childhood maltreatment predicts CVD risk in adulthood using objective biomarkers and whether social support buffers this relationship in line with the stress-buffering hypothesis.
Methods
We analyzed data from 4137 participants in Waves 1, 3, and 5 of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health). Childhood maltreatment and social support were measured using validated scales, and 30-year CVD risk was estimated using the Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Score. Fractional outcome models were used to examine the main and moderating effects, and sensitivity analyses using Heckman selection models were conducted to address potential selection bias.
Results
Childhood maltreatment was significantly related to elevated adult CVD risk, supporting the biological embedding model. In line with the stress-buffering hypothesis, social support moderated this association, buffering the adverse health effects of early maltreatment.
Conclusions
Findings support the stress-buffering hypothesis and highlight the importance of early social support in mitigating the long-term physiological impact of childhood adversity. Integrating the biological embedding model with the stress-buffering hypothesis can improve understanding of resilience and inform strategies to reduce health disparities rooted in early life experiences.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.