{"title":"社交焦虑的安全行为消退:自我监控干预的随机对照试验","authors":"James M. Zech , Tapan A. Patel , Jesse R. Cougle","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.103068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Safety behaviors (SBs) are hypothesized to play a key role in social anxiety and present as a viable target of psychosocial treatments. While SB reduction is a component of some cognitive-behavioral therapies for social anxiety, prior research suggests safety behavior fading also represents a viable, standalone digital treatment for social anxiety. The aim of the present study was to test a one-month self-monitoring SB treatment in individuals reporting elevated social anxiety symptoms against a credible control condition. Participants (<em>N</em> = 201) were randomized to either a SB fading condition (<em>n</em> = 99) or an unhealthy behavior fading control (<em>n</em> = 102). Compared to control, SB fading led to lower SB use at post but not one-month follow-up. Contrary to predictions, both conditions saw significant and comparable reductions in social anxiety and related outcomes (depression, loneliness) at posttreatment and follow-up. Treatment credibility and expectancy moderated the effect of condition, such that among participants with more positive beliefs about treatment (after being provided with the rationale), those in the SB condition reported significantly lower follow-up social anxiety than those in control. Further, in the SB condition, both higher social interaction frequency and lower loneliness at baseline were predictive of lower social anxiety at follow-up. Overall, our findings show limitations to SB fading as a standalone intervention and suggest this strategy is more effective among those who interact with others more frequently and who are more confident in this treatment approach. We discuss clinical implications and future research directions, including potential refinements to SB treatment protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 103068"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety behavior fading for social anxiety: A randomized controlled trial of a self-monitoring intervention\",\"authors\":\"James M. Zech , Tapan A. Patel , Jesse R. Cougle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.103068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Safety behaviors (SBs) are hypothesized to play a key role in social anxiety and present as a viable target of psychosocial treatments. While SB reduction is a component of some cognitive-behavioral therapies for social anxiety, prior research suggests safety behavior fading also represents a viable, standalone digital treatment for social anxiety. The aim of the present study was to test a one-month self-monitoring SB treatment in individuals reporting elevated social anxiety symptoms against a credible control condition. Participants (<em>N</em> = 201) were randomized to either a SB fading condition (<em>n</em> = 99) or an unhealthy behavior fading control (<em>n</em> = 102). Compared to control, SB fading led to lower SB use at post but not one-month follow-up. Contrary to predictions, both conditions saw significant and comparable reductions in social anxiety and related outcomes (depression, loneliness) at posttreatment and follow-up. Treatment credibility and expectancy moderated the effect of condition, such that among participants with more positive beliefs about treatment (after being provided with the rationale), those in the SB condition reported significantly lower follow-up social anxiety than those in control. Further, in the SB condition, both higher social interaction frequency and lower loneliness at baseline were predictive of lower social anxiety at follow-up. Overall, our findings show limitations to SB fading as a standalone intervention and suggest this strategy is more effective among those who interact with others more frequently and who are more confident in this treatment approach. We discuss clinical implications and future research directions, including potential refinements to SB treatment protocols.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anxiety Disorders\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103068\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anxiety Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618525001045\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618525001045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety behavior fading for social anxiety: A randomized controlled trial of a self-monitoring intervention
Safety behaviors (SBs) are hypothesized to play a key role in social anxiety and present as a viable target of psychosocial treatments. While SB reduction is a component of some cognitive-behavioral therapies for social anxiety, prior research suggests safety behavior fading also represents a viable, standalone digital treatment for social anxiety. The aim of the present study was to test a one-month self-monitoring SB treatment in individuals reporting elevated social anxiety symptoms against a credible control condition. Participants (N = 201) were randomized to either a SB fading condition (n = 99) or an unhealthy behavior fading control (n = 102). Compared to control, SB fading led to lower SB use at post but not one-month follow-up. Contrary to predictions, both conditions saw significant and comparable reductions in social anxiety and related outcomes (depression, loneliness) at posttreatment and follow-up. Treatment credibility and expectancy moderated the effect of condition, such that among participants with more positive beliefs about treatment (after being provided with the rationale), those in the SB condition reported significantly lower follow-up social anxiety than those in control. Further, in the SB condition, both higher social interaction frequency and lower loneliness at baseline were predictive of lower social anxiety at follow-up. Overall, our findings show limitations to SB fading as a standalone intervention and suggest this strategy is more effective among those who interact with others more frequently and who are more confident in this treatment approach. We discuss clinical implications and future research directions, including potential refinements to SB treatment protocols.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.