通过360个中国城市的街道热点重新审视城市规模

IF 6.6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES
Ding Ma , Lili Deng , Renzhong Guo , Zhengdong Huang , Wei Zhu , Chengyue Zhang , Siru Li , Xiaoming Li , Ye Zheng
{"title":"通过360个中国城市的街道热点重新审视城市规模","authors":"Ding Ma ,&nbsp;Lili Deng ,&nbsp;Renzhong Guo ,&nbsp;Zhengdong Huang ,&nbsp;Wei Zhu ,&nbsp;Chengyue Zhang ,&nbsp;Siru Li ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Li ,&nbsp;Ye Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China has undergone exceptionally rapid urbanization in the past few decades, but it now faces significant challenges related to uneven development across different regions. Using a triangulated irregular network (TIN)-based method, we extracted street-based hotspots across 360 Chinese cities. This allows us to analyze how development differs across sub-regions within each city. We identified urban scaling laws for three key attributes—number of street junctions, gross domestic product (GDP), and population—across three spatial units: hotspots, non-hotspots, and the city as a whole. Our results reveal a clear scaling divergence, with cities under 1 million and over 5 million people exhibiting greater spatial disparities between hotspot and non-hotspot areas. This suggests that spatial disparities tends to be more pronounced in both smaller and larger cities in China. Furthermore, we applied scale-adjusted metropolitan indicators (SAMIs) to rank cities based on internal disparities, reinforcing our findings across different city groups. By establishing a functionally meaningful and consistent spatial structure, our method offers deeper insights into intra-city disparities and supports more scale-sensitive, context-aware urban policies within a broader urban system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 106386"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting urban scaling through street-based hotspots across 360 Chinese cities\",\"authors\":\"Ding Ma ,&nbsp;Lili Deng ,&nbsp;Renzhong Guo ,&nbsp;Zhengdong Huang ,&nbsp;Wei Zhu ,&nbsp;Chengyue Zhang ,&nbsp;Siru Li ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Li ,&nbsp;Ye Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>China has undergone exceptionally rapid urbanization in the past few decades, but it now faces significant challenges related to uneven development across different regions. Using a triangulated irregular network (TIN)-based method, we extracted street-based hotspots across 360 Chinese cities. This allows us to analyze how development differs across sub-regions within each city. We identified urban scaling laws for three key attributes—number of street junctions, gross domestic product (GDP), and population—across three spatial units: hotspots, non-hotspots, and the city as a whole. Our results reveal a clear scaling divergence, with cities under 1 million and over 5 million people exhibiting greater spatial disparities between hotspot and non-hotspot areas. This suggests that spatial disparities tends to be more pronounced in both smaller and larger cities in China. Furthermore, we applied scale-adjusted metropolitan indicators (SAMIs) to rank cities based on internal disparities, reinforcing our findings across different city groups. By establishing a functionally meaningful and consistent spatial structure, our method offers deeper insights into intra-city disparities and supports more scale-sensitive, context-aware urban policies within a broader urban system.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":\"167 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125006870\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125006870","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,中国经历了异常快速的城市化,但现在它面临着与不同地区发展不平衡相关的重大挑战。利用基于不规则三角网(TIN)的方法,我们提取了中国360个城市的街道热点。这使我们能够分析每个城市内不同子区域的发展差异。我们确定了三个关键属性的城市尺度规律——街道路口数量、国内生产总值(GDP)和人口——跨越三个空间单元:热点、非热点和整个城市。我们的研究结果显示出明显的尺度差异,100万以下和500万以上人口的城市在热点地区和非热点地区之间表现出更大的空间差异。这表明空间差异在中国的大小城市中都更为明显。此外,我们应用规模调整都市指标(SAMIs)对城市进行内部差异排名,从而在不同城市群体中强化我们的发现。通过建立功能上有意义和一致的空间结构,我们的方法为城市内部差异提供了更深入的见解,并在更广泛的城市系统中支持更具规模敏感性和环境感知的城市政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting urban scaling through street-based hotspots across 360 Chinese cities
China has undergone exceptionally rapid urbanization in the past few decades, but it now faces significant challenges related to uneven development across different regions. Using a triangulated irregular network (TIN)-based method, we extracted street-based hotspots across 360 Chinese cities. This allows us to analyze how development differs across sub-regions within each city. We identified urban scaling laws for three key attributes—number of street junctions, gross domestic product (GDP), and population—across three spatial units: hotspots, non-hotspots, and the city as a whole. Our results reveal a clear scaling divergence, with cities under 1 million and over 5 million people exhibiting greater spatial disparities between hotspot and non-hotspot areas. This suggests that spatial disparities tends to be more pronounced in both smaller and larger cities in China. Furthermore, we applied scale-adjusted metropolitan indicators (SAMIs) to rank cities based on internal disparities, reinforcing our findings across different city groups. By establishing a functionally meaningful and consistent spatial structure, our method offers deeper insights into intra-city disparities and supports more scale-sensitive, context-aware urban policies within a broader urban system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信