Ding Ma , Lili Deng , Renzhong Guo , Zhengdong Huang , Wei Zhu , Chengyue Zhang , Siru Li , Xiaoming Li , Ye Zheng
{"title":"通过360个中国城市的街道热点重新审视城市规模","authors":"Ding Ma , Lili Deng , Renzhong Guo , Zhengdong Huang , Wei Zhu , Chengyue Zhang , Siru Li , Xiaoming Li , Ye Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China has undergone exceptionally rapid urbanization in the past few decades, but it now faces significant challenges related to uneven development across different regions. Using a triangulated irregular network (TIN)-based method, we extracted street-based hotspots across 360 Chinese cities. This allows us to analyze how development differs across sub-regions within each city. We identified urban scaling laws for three key attributes—number of street junctions, gross domestic product (GDP), and population—across three spatial units: hotspots, non-hotspots, and the city as a whole. Our results reveal a clear scaling divergence, with cities under 1 million and over 5 million people exhibiting greater spatial disparities between hotspot and non-hotspot areas. This suggests that spatial disparities tends to be more pronounced in both smaller and larger cities in China. Furthermore, we applied scale-adjusted metropolitan indicators (SAMIs) to rank cities based on internal disparities, reinforcing our findings across different city groups. By establishing a functionally meaningful and consistent spatial structure, our method offers deeper insights into intra-city disparities and supports more scale-sensitive, context-aware urban policies within a broader urban system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 106386"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting urban scaling through street-based hotspots across 360 Chinese cities\",\"authors\":\"Ding Ma , Lili Deng , Renzhong Guo , Zhengdong Huang , Wei Zhu , Chengyue Zhang , Siru Li , Xiaoming Li , Ye Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>China has undergone exceptionally rapid urbanization in the past few decades, but it now faces significant challenges related to uneven development across different regions. Using a triangulated irregular network (TIN)-based method, we extracted street-based hotspots across 360 Chinese cities. This allows us to analyze how development differs across sub-regions within each city. We identified urban scaling laws for three key attributes—number of street junctions, gross domestic product (GDP), and population—across three spatial units: hotspots, non-hotspots, and the city as a whole. Our results reveal a clear scaling divergence, with cities under 1 million and over 5 million people exhibiting greater spatial disparities between hotspot and non-hotspot areas. This suggests that spatial disparities tends to be more pronounced in both smaller and larger cities in China. Furthermore, we applied scale-adjusted metropolitan indicators (SAMIs) to rank cities based on internal disparities, reinforcing our findings across different city groups. By establishing a functionally meaningful and consistent spatial structure, our method offers deeper insights into intra-city disparities and supports more scale-sensitive, context-aware urban policies within a broader urban system.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":\"167 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125006870\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125006870","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Revisiting urban scaling through street-based hotspots across 360 Chinese cities
China has undergone exceptionally rapid urbanization in the past few decades, but it now faces significant challenges related to uneven development across different regions. Using a triangulated irregular network (TIN)-based method, we extracted street-based hotspots across 360 Chinese cities. This allows us to analyze how development differs across sub-regions within each city. We identified urban scaling laws for three key attributes—number of street junctions, gross domestic product (GDP), and population—across three spatial units: hotspots, non-hotspots, and the city as a whole. Our results reveal a clear scaling divergence, with cities under 1 million and over 5 million people exhibiting greater spatial disparities between hotspot and non-hotspot areas. This suggests that spatial disparities tends to be more pronounced in both smaller and larger cities in China. Furthermore, we applied scale-adjusted metropolitan indicators (SAMIs) to rank cities based on internal disparities, reinforcing our findings across different city groups. By establishing a functionally meaningful and consistent spatial structure, our method offers deeper insights into intra-city disparities and supports more scale-sensitive, context-aware urban policies within a broader urban system.
期刊介绍:
Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.