完善COVID-19疫苗的证据基础

IF 50 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Helen Y. Chu, Holly Janes, Marco Carone, Peter B. Gilbert, Stanley Plotkin
{"title":"完善COVID-19疫苗的证据基础","authors":"Helen Y. Chu, Holly Janes, Marco Carone, Peter B. Gilbert, Stanley Plotkin","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03908-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic marked an unprecedented time when safe and effective vaccines were developed, authorized, and approved for use within months of the initial identification of the novel coronavirus<sup>1</sup>. These authorizations and approvals were based on large, placebo-controlled trials powered to characterize safety and efficacy against clinically significant infection — appropriate designs given the use of vaccine platforms, such as mRNA technology, and antigens, including the prefusion spike protein, that had not previously been studied at large scale in humans. These early studies were among the largest clinical trials in recent history, enrolling tens of thousands of participants and providing definitive evidence of the safety and efficacy of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.</p><p>Since then, the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 has prompted annual updates to COVID-19 vaccine composition to match the predominant circulating strain. Multiple national surveillance platforms provide data on the effectiveness of current vaccines to inform the need for updates<sup>5</sup>. As with other seasonal vaccines (for example, influenza), these updates are based on immunobridging studies that compare neutralizing antibody titers induced by vaccines with new variant inserts to those induced by approved vaccines<sup>6</sup>. Licensure by a regulatory body typically requires non-inferiority of the investigational vaccine versus the approved vaccine, meaning that the investigational vaccine is not clinically significantly worse than the approved vaccine (Fig. 1b). For seasonal vaccines, this is appropriate for several reasons. Annual vaccine updates require considerable lead time for production. For influenza, strain selection decisions are typically made 4–6 months in advance at a semiannual meeting convened by the World Health Organization, followed by a meeting of the US Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccine and Related Biologics Advisory Committee, which recommends strains to domestic vaccine manufacturers. To match the vaccine to circulating strains while also giving manufacturers sufficient time to produce the necessary doses for distribution, strain selection recommendations are made using immunobridging studies that show neutralization of new circulating variants. The timeline for COVID-19 vaccine updates might differ based on the evolution of the virus as well as use of mRNA technology, though it still requires lead time for production and distribution. Immunobridging is a well-established approach for seasonal vaccine strain selection and is standard practice in many countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the evidence base for COVID-19 vaccines\",\"authors\":\"Helen Y. Chu, Holly Janes, Marco Carone, Peter B. Gilbert, Stanley Plotkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-025-03908-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic marked an unprecedented time when safe and effective vaccines were developed, authorized, and approved for use within months of the initial identification of the novel coronavirus<sup>1</sup>. These authorizations and approvals were based on large, placebo-controlled trials powered to characterize safety and efficacy against clinically significant infection — appropriate designs given the use of vaccine platforms, such as mRNA technology, and antigens, including the prefusion spike protein, that had not previously been studied at large scale in humans. These early studies were among the largest clinical trials in recent history, enrolling tens of thousands of participants and providing definitive evidence of the safety and efficacy of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.</p><p>Since then, the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 has prompted annual updates to COVID-19 vaccine composition to match the predominant circulating strain. Multiple national surveillance platforms provide data on the effectiveness of current vaccines to inform the need for updates<sup>5</sup>. As with other seasonal vaccines (for example, influenza), these updates are based on immunobridging studies that compare neutralizing antibody titers induced by vaccines with new variant inserts to those induced by approved vaccines<sup>6</sup>. Licensure by a regulatory body typically requires non-inferiority of the investigational vaccine versus the approved vaccine, meaning that the investigational vaccine is not clinically significantly worse than the approved vaccine (Fig. 1b). For seasonal vaccines, this is appropriate for several reasons. Annual vaccine updates require considerable lead time for production. For influenza, strain selection decisions are typically made 4–6 months in advance at a semiannual meeting convened by the World Health Organization, followed by a meeting of the US Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccine and Related Biologics Advisory Committee, which recommends strains to domestic vaccine manufacturers. To match the vaccine to circulating strains while also giving manufacturers sufficient time to produce the necessary doses for distribution, strain selection recommendations are made using immunobridging studies that show neutralization of new circulating variants. The timeline for COVID-19 vaccine updates might differ based on the evolution of the virus as well as use of mRNA technology, though it still requires lead time for production and distribution. Immunobridging is a well-established approach for seasonal vaccine strain selection and is standard practice in many countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":50.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03908-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03908-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19大流行的开始标志着一个前所未有的时刻,在初步确定新型冠状病毒的几个月内,安全有效的疫苗就被开发、授权和批准使用。这些授权和批准是基于大型安慰剂对照试验,这些试验旨在表征抗临床显著感染的安全性和有效性——考虑到使用疫苗平台(如mRNA技术)和抗原(包括融合前刺突蛋白)的适当设计,这些抗原以前没有在人体中进行过大规模研究。这些早期研究是近代史上规模最大的临床试验之一,招募了数万名参与者,并为SARS-CoV-2疫苗的安全性和有效性提供了明确的证据。从那时起,SARS-CoV-2的演变促使每年更新COVID-19疫苗组成,以匹配主要的流行毒株。多个国家监测平台提供有关现有疫苗有效性的数据,以告知更新疫苗的必要性5。与其他季节性疫苗(例如流感疫苗)一样,这些更新是基于免疫桥接研究,这些研究将带有新变异插入物的疫苗诱导的中和抗体滴度与经批准的疫苗诱导的中和抗体滴度进行比较。监管机构的许可通常要求研究用疫苗与已批准的疫苗相比具有非劣效性,这意味着研究用疫苗在临床上并不明显差于已批准的疫苗(图1b)。对于季节性疫苗,这是合适的,原因有几个。每年更新的疫苗需要相当长的生产前置时间。对于流感,菌株选择通常提前4-6个月在世界卫生组织召开的半年度会议上做出决定,随后由美国食品和药物管理局疫苗和相关生物制品咨询委员会召开会议,向国内疫苗制造商推荐菌株。为了使疫苗与流行毒株相匹配,同时也使制造商有足够的时间生产必要的剂量用于分发,利用免疫桥接研究提出了毒株选择建议,这些研究显示新的流行变种具有中和作用。COVID-19疫苗更新的时间表可能会根据病毒的演变以及mRNA技术的使用而有所不同,尽管它仍然需要生产和分销的准备时间。免疫桥接是季节性疫苗株选择的一种行之有效的方法,也是许多国家的标准做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Improving the evidence base for COVID-19 vaccines

Improving the evidence base for COVID-19 vaccines

The beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic marked an unprecedented time when safe and effective vaccines were developed, authorized, and approved for use within months of the initial identification of the novel coronavirus1. These authorizations and approvals were based on large, placebo-controlled trials powered to characterize safety and efficacy against clinically significant infection — appropriate designs given the use of vaccine platforms, such as mRNA technology, and antigens, including the prefusion spike protein, that had not previously been studied at large scale in humans. These early studies were among the largest clinical trials in recent history, enrolling tens of thousands of participants and providing definitive evidence of the safety and efficacy of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

Since then, the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 has prompted annual updates to COVID-19 vaccine composition to match the predominant circulating strain. Multiple national surveillance platforms provide data on the effectiveness of current vaccines to inform the need for updates5. As with other seasonal vaccines (for example, influenza), these updates are based on immunobridging studies that compare neutralizing antibody titers induced by vaccines with new variant inserts to those induced by approved vaccines6. Licensure by a regulatory body typically requires non-inferiority of the investigational vaccine versus the approved vaccine, meaning that the investigational vaccine is not clinically significantly worse than the approved vaccine (Fig. 1b). For seasonal vaccines, this is appropriate for several reasons. Annual vaccine updates require considerable lead time for production. For influenza, strain selection decisions are typically made 4–6 months in advance at a semiannual meeting convened by the World Health Organization, followed by a meeting of the US Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccine and Related Biologics Advisory Committee, which recommends strains to domestic vaccine manufacturers. To match the vaccine to circulating strains while also giving manufacturers sufficient time to produce the necessary doses for distribution, strain selection recommendations are made using immunobridging studies that show neutralization of new circulating variants. The timeline for COVID-19 vaccine updates might differ based on the evolution of the virus as well as use of mRNA technology, though it still requires lead time for production and distribution. Immunobridging is a well-established approach for seasonal vaccine strain selection and is standard practice in many countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信