Jonas El Gammal, Riccardo Buscicchio, Germano Nardini, and Jesús Torrado
{"title":"用高斯过程加速LISA推理","authors":"Jonas El Gammal, Riccardo Buscicchio, Germano Nardini, and Jesús Torrado","doi":"10.1103/c66v-rl3w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Source inference for deterministic gravitational waves is a computationally demanding task in LISA. In a novel approach, we investigate the capability of Gaussian processes to learn the posterior surface in order to reconstruct individual signal posteriors. We use GPry, which automates this reconstruction through active learning, using a very small number of likelihood evaluations, without the need for pretraining. We benchmark GPry against the cutting-edge nested sampler nessai, by injecting individually three signals on LISA noisy data simulated with Balrog: a white dwarf binary (DWD), a stellar-mass black hole binary (stBHB), and a supermassive black hole binary (SMBHB). We find that GPry needs 𝒪(10−2) fewer likelihood evaluations to achieve an inference accuracy comparable to nessai, with Jensen-Shannon divergence 𝐷JS ≲0.01 for the DWD, and 𝐷JS ≲0.05 for the SMBHB. Lower accuracy is found for the less Gaussian posterior of the stBHB: 𝐷JS ≲0.2. Despite the overhead costs of GPry, we obtain a speedup of 𝒪(102) for the slowest cases of stBHB and SMBHB. In conclusion, active-learning Gaussian process frameworks show great potential for rapid LISA parameter inference, especially for costly likelihoods, enabling suppression of computational costs without the trade-off of approximations in the calculations.","PeriodicalId":20167,"journal":{"name":"Physical Review D","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accelerating LISA inference with Gaussian processes\",\"authors\":\"Jonas El Gammal, Riccardo Buscicchio, Germano Nardini, and Jesús Torrado\",\"doi\":\"10.1103/c66v-rl3w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Source inference for deterministic gravitational waves is a computationally demanding task in LISA. In a novel approach, we investigate the capability of Gaussian processes to learn the posterior surface in order to reconstruct individual signal posteriors. We use GPry, which automates this reconstruction through active learning, using a very small number of likelihood evaluations, without the need for pretraining. We benchmark GPry against the cutting-edge nested sampler nessai, by injecting individually three signals on LISA noisy data simulated with Balrog: a white dwarf binary (DWD), a stellar-mass black hole binary (stBHB), and a supermassive black hole binary (SMBHB). We find that GPry needs 𝒪(10−2) fewer likelihood evaluations to achieve an inference accuracy comparable to nessai, with Jensen-Shannon divergence 𝐷JS ≲0.01 for the DWD, and 𝐷JS ≲0.05 for the SMBHB. Lower accuracy is found for the less Gaussian posterior of the stBHB: 𝐷JS ≲0.2. Despite the overhead costs of GPry, we obtain a speedup of 𝒪(102) for the slowest cases of stBHB and SMBHB. In conclusion, active-learning Gaussian process frameworks show great potential for rapid LISA parameter inference, especially for costly likelihoods, enabling suppression of computational costs without the trade-off of approximations in the calculations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Review D\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Review D\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1103/c66v-rl3w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Physics and Astronomy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Review D","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/c66v-rl3w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accelerating LISA inference with Gaussian processes
Source inference for deterministic gravitational waves is a computationally demanding task in LISA. In a novel approach, we investigate the capability of Gaussian processes to learn the posterior surface in order to reconstruct individual signal posteriors. We use GPry, which automates this reconstruction through active learning, using a very small number of likelihood evaluations, without the need for pretraining. We benchmark GPry against the cutting-edge nested sampler nessai, by injecting individually three signals on LISA noisy data simulated with Balrog: a white dwarf binary (DWD), a stellar-mass black hole binary (stBHB), and a supermassive black hole binary (SMBHB). We find that GPry needs 𝒪(10−2) fewer likelihood evaluations to achieve an inference accuracy comparable to nessai, with Jensen-Shannon divergence 𝐷JS ≲0.01 for the DWD, and 𝐷JS ≲0.05 for the SMBHB. Lower accuracy is found for the less Gaussian posterior of the stBHB: 𝐷JS ≲0.2. Despite the overhead costs of GPry, we obtain a speedup of 𝒪(102) for the slowest cases of stBHB and SMBHB. In conclusion, active-learning Gaussian process frameworks show great potential for rapid LISA parameter inference, especially for costly likelihoods, enabling suppression of computational costs without the trade-off of approximations in the calculations.
期刊介绍:
Physical Review D (PRD) is a leading journal in elementary particle physics, field theory, gravitation, and cosmology and is one of the top-cited journals in high-energy physics.
PRD covers experimental and theoretical results in all aspects of particle physics, field theory, gravitation and cosmology, including:
Particle physics experiments,
Electroweak interactions,
Strong interactions,
Lattice field theories, lattice QCD,
Beyond the standard model physics,
Phenomenological aspects of field theory, general methods,
Gravity, cosmology, cosmic rays,
Astrophysics and astroparticle physics,
General relativity,
Formal aspects of field theory, field theory in curved space,
String theory, quantum gravity, gauge/gravity duality.