老年胆管炎患者的内镜逆行胆管造影:沙特阿拉伯中部的单中心经验。

IF 2
Abdulaziz Al Masoud, Georgios Zacharakis, Abdulrahman Al-Robayan, Ebtissam Al-Meghaiseeb, Reem Al-Amro, Hadeel Ghazal, Nabih Alansari, Nawaf Bin Mugren, Abdullah Alshablan, Amal Aldawish, Ali Alduhayshi
{"title":"老年胆管炎患者的内镜逆行胆管造影:沙特阿拉伯中部的单中心经验。","authors":"Abdulaziz Al Masoud, Georgios Zacharakis, Abdulrahman Al-Robayan, Ebtissam Al-Meghaiseeb, Reem Al-Amro, Hadeel Ghazal, Nabih Alansari, Nawaf Bin Mugren, Abdullah Alshablan, Amal Aldawish, Ali Alduhayshi","doi":"10.4103/sjg.sjg_205_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an essential tool for managing biliary diseases, particularly in geriatric patients. However, limited data exists on its safety and efficacy in geriatric population in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study evaluated ERCP outcomes in patients aged ≥70 at Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, between November 2023 and May 2025. Patients were categorized into two groups: 70-80 years and ≥81 years. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), American Society of Anesthesiologists status (ASA) physical status, Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), indications, procedural success, and 30-day complications (per Cotton's criteria).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 403 ERCPs, 363 (90.7%) were performed in patients ≥70 years old. Of those, 199 were aged 70-80 years (mean 77.67 ± 5.4 years) and 164 were aged 81-103 years (mean 87.36 ± 5.26 years). The ≥81 years age group had more males (120 of 164, 73.2% vs. 123 of 199, 61.8%; P = 0.022), lower DASI (14.8 vs. 25.12; P < 0.001), and higher comorbidity rate (156 of 164, 95.12% vs. 150 of 199, 75.38%; P < 0.001). Common indications and technique success rates were similar between groups. Overall complication rates did not differ significantly; post ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was more frequent in younger than in the older group (8 of 199, 4.02% vs 2 of 164, 1.21%; P = 0.096). No 30-day ERCP-related mortality was reported in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ERCP was safe and effective in Saudi geriatric patients, including those ≥81 years, with complication rates indicating that age alone should not preclude its use when clinically indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":520774,"journal":{"name":"Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography of geriatric patients with cholangitis: A single-center experience in central Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulaziz Al Masoud, Georgios Zacharakis, Abdulrahman Al-Robayan, Ebtissam Al-Meghaiseeb, Reem Al-Amro, Hadeel Ghazal, Nabih Alansari, Nawaf Bin Mugren, Abdullah Alshablan, Amal Aldawish, Ali Alduhayshi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sjg.sjg_205_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an essential tool for managing biliary diseases, particularly in geriatric patients. However, limited data exists on its safety and efficacy in geriatric population in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study evaluated ERCP outcomes in patients aged ≥70 at Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, between November 2023 and May 2025. Patients were categorized into two groups: 70-80 years and ≥81 years. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), American Society of Anesthesiologists status (ASA) physical status, Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), indications, procedural success, and 30-day complications (per Cotton's criteria).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 403 ERCPs, 363 (90.7%) were performed in patients ≥70 years old. Of those, 199 were aged 70-80 years (mean 77.67 ± 5.4 years) and 164 were aged 81-103 years (mean 87.36 ± 5.26 years). The ≥81 years age group had more males (120 of 164, 73.2% vs. 123 of 199, 61.8%; P = 0.022), lower DASI (14.8 vs. 25.12; P < 0.001), and higher comorbidity rate (156 of 164, 95.12% vs. 150 of 199, 75.38%; P < 0.001). Common indications and technique success rates were similar between groups. Overall complication rates did not differ significantly; post ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was more frequent in younger than in the older group (8 of 199, 4.02% vs 2 of 164, 1.21%; P = 0.096). No 30-day ERCP-related mortality was reported in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ERCP was safe and effective in Saudi geriatric patients, including those ≥81 years, with complication rates indicating that age alone should not preclude its use when clinically indicated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_205_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_205_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内窥镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)是治疗胆道疾病的重要工具,特别是在老年患者中。然而,关于其在沙特阿拉伯老年人群中的安全性和有效性的数据有限。方法:这项前瞻性研究评估了2023年11月至2025年5月期间在利雅得苏丹王子军事医疗城的年龄≥70岁患者的ERCP结果。患者分为70 ~ 80岁和≥81岁两组。收集的数据包括人口统计学、合并症、Charlson合并症指数(CCI)、美国麻醉医师协会状态(ASA)身体状况、Duke活动状态指数(DASI)、适应症、手术成功率和30天并发症(按Cotton标准)。结果:403例ercp中,363例(90.7%)患者年龄≥70岁。其中年龄70 ~ 80岁199例(平均77.67±5.4岁),81 ~ 103岁164例(平均87.36±5.26岁)。≥81岁年龄组男性较多(164例中120例,73.2%比199例中123例,61.8%,P = 0.022), DASI较低(14.8比25.12,P < 0.001),合并症发生率较高(164例中156例,95.12%比199例中150例,75.38%,P < 0.001)。两组间常见适应症和手术成功率相似。总并发症发生率无显著差异;ERCP后胰腺炎(PEP)在年轻人中发生率高于老年人(199例8例,4.02% vs 164例2例,1.21%;P = 0.096)。两组均无30天ercp相关死亡报告。结论:ERCP在沙特老年患者(包括≥81岁的患者)中是安全有效的,其并发症发生率表明,在临床指征时,年龄不应排除其使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography of geriatric patients with cholangitis: A single-center experience in central Saudi Arabia.

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an essential tool for managing biliary diseases, particularly in geriatric patients. However, limited data exists on its safety and efficacy in geriatric population in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This prospective study evaluated ERCP outcomes in patients aged ≥70 at Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, between November 2023 and May 2025. Patients were categorized into two groups: 70-80 years and ≥81 years. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), American Society of Anesthesiologists status (ASA) physical status, Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), indications, procedural success, and 30-day complications (per Cotton's criteria).

Results: Of 403 ERCPs, 363 (90.7%) were performed in patients ≥70 years old. Of those, 199 were aged 70-80 years (mean 77.67 ± 5.4 years) and 164 were aged 81-103 years (mean 87.36 ± 5.26 years). The ≥81 years age group had more males (120 of 164, 73.2% vs. 123 of 199, 61.8%; P = 0.022), lower DASI (14.8 vs. 25.12; P < 0.001), and higher comorbidity rate (156 of 164, 95.12% vs. 150 of 199, 75.38%; P < 0.001). Common indications and technique success rates were similar between groups. Overall complication rates did not differ significantly; post ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was more frequent in younger than in the older group (8 of 199, 4.02% vs 2 of 164, 1.21%; P = 0.096). No 30-day ERCP-related mortality was reported in either group.

Conclusions: ERCP was safe and effective in Saudi geriatric patients, including those ≥81 years, with complication rates indicating that age alone should not preclude its use when clinically indicated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信