Erika N. Dreikorn, Seth Sacchi, Katherine Riden, Philip E. Empey, Mylynda B. Massart, Lucas A. Berenbrok
{"title":"了解临床医生的偏好以支持电子健康记录中的药物基因组学结果:一项学术卫生系统的定性研究。","authors":"Erika N. Dreikorn, Seth Sacchi, Katherine Riden, Philip E. Empey, Mylynda B. Massart, Lucas A. Berenbrok","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2025.102912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Integrating pharmacogenomic (PGx) test results into electronic health records (EHRs) represents a crucial step in the advancement of precision medicine. However, successful implementation is often hindered by lack of, or gaps in, clinician training; lack of clinician confidence; and system-level barriers such as limited awareness of PGx utility, complex interpretation of results, and time constraints.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Through qualitative analysis, this study aimed to identify clinician preferences regarding the educational, technical, and workflow supports needed to effectively integrate PGx results into EHRs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Clinicians practicing in a large academic health system in Western Pennsylvania, including physicians, advanced practice nurses, physician assistants, and pharmacists, were invited to participate in this study. The research team developed a semi-structured interview guide using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research as a framework. Interviews were conducted using videoconferencing software, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive reasoning analysis to identify key barriers and proposed solutions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen interviews were conducted, which revealed 7 themes: (1) contextualization of utility; (2) clinician confidence and comfort; (3) consultations; (4) resulting and alerting; (5) communication of pharmacogenomic results; (6) decelerators; and (7) education preferences. Participants emphasized the need for simplified workflows, specialty-specific training, embedded EHR tools, and patient-centered communication strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Clinician-preferred strategies, including intuitive clinical decision support tools, modular education resources, and streamlined communication pathways, are critical to successful PGx implementation. These findings offer a practical blueprint for integrating PGx into clinical practice and inform scalable models for precision medicine adoption across health systems. Further research should explore nuanced themes to further accelerate PGx deployments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":"65 6","pages":"Article 102912"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding clinician support preferences related to the use of pharmacogenomic results in electronic health records: A qualitative study in an academic health system\",\"authors\":\"Erika N. Dreikorn, Seth Sacchi, Katherine Riden, Philip E. Empey, Mylynda B. Massart, Lucas A. Berenbrok\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.japh.2025.102912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Integrating pharmacogenomic (PGx) test results into electronic health records (EHRs) represents a crucial step in the advancement of precision medicine. However, successful implementation is often hindered by lack of, or gaps in, clinician training; lack of clinician confidence; and system-level barriers such as limited awareness of PGx utility, complex interpretation of results, and time constraints.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Through qualitative analysis, this study aimed to identify clinician preferences regarding the educational, technical, and workflow supports needed to effectively integrate PGx results into EHRs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Clinicians practicing in a large academic health system in Western Pennsylvania, including physicians, advanced practice nurses, physician assistants, and pharmacists, were invited to participate in this study. The research team developed a semi-structured interview guide using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research as a framework. Interviews were conducted using videoconferencing software, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive reasoning analysis to identify key barriers and proposed solutions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen interviews were conducted, which revealed 7 themes: (1) contextualization of utility; (2) clinician confidence and comfort; (3) consultations; (4) resulting and alerting; (5) communication of pharmacogenomic results; (6) decelerators; and (7) education preferences. Participants emphasized the need for simplified workflows, specialty-specific training, embedded EHR tools, and patient-centered communication strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Clinician-preferred strategies, including intuitive clinical decision support tools, modular education resources, and streamlined communication pathways, are critical to successful PGx implementation. These findings offer a practical blueprint for integrating PGx into clinical practice and inform scalable models for precision medicine adoption across health systems. Further research should explore nuanced themes to further accelerate PGx deployments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association\",\"volume\":\"65 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 102912\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319125005916\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319125005916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding clinician support preferences related to the use of pharmacogenomic results in electronic health records: A qualitative study in an academic health system
Background
Integrating pharmacogenomic (PGx) test results into electronic health records (EHRs) represents a crucial step in the advancement of precision medicine. However, successful implementation is often hindered by lack of, or gaps in, clinician training; lack of clinician confidence; and system-level barriers such as limited awareness of PGx utility, complex interpretation of results, and time constraints.
Objectives
Through qualitative analysis, this study aimed to identify clinician preferences regarding the educational, technical, and workflow supports needed to effectively integrate PGx results into EHRs.
Methods
Clinicians practicing in a large academic health system in Western Pennsylvania, including physicians, advanced practice nurses, physician assistants, and pharmacists, were invited to participate in this study. The research team developed a semi-structured interview guide using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research as a framework. Interviews were conducted using videoconferencing software, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive reasoning analysis to identify key barriers and proposed solutions.
Results
Sixteen interviews were conducted, which revealed 7 themes: (1) contextualization of utility; (2) clinician confidence and comfort; (3) consultations; (4) resulting and alerting; (5) communication of pharmacogenomic results; (6) decelerators; and (7) education preferences. Participants emphasized the need for simplified workflows, specialty-specific training, embedded EHR tools, and patient-centered communication strategies.
Conclusion
Clinician-preferred strategies, including intuitive clinical decision support tools, modular education resources, and streamlined communication pathways, are critical to successful PGx implementation. These findings offer a practical blueprint for integrating PGx into clinical practice and inform scalable models for precision medicine adoption across health systems. Further research should explore nuanced themes to further accelerate PGx deployments.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.