Amber L Faircloth, Molly M Jacobs, Patrick M Briley
{"title":"来自弱势背景的口吃学龄儿童的社会技能和联系。","authors":"Amber L Faircloth, Molly M Jacobs, Patrick M Briley","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exploring the psychosocial experiences of school-age children from vulnerable backgrounds who stutter allows for a better understanding of the compounding impacts of stuttering and challenging familial factors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were drawn from Wave 5 of the Future of Families and Child Wellbeing Study (FFCWS). This study evaluated social adaptability among children from vulnerable backgrounds who do stutter (CVBWS) and children from vulnerable backgrounds who do not stutter (CVBWNS) using two scales: the Social Skills Rating System (SSRS) and the Connectedness at School Scale (CSS). A comparison of means and regression analyses were used to compare the groups controlling for heterogeneity in diverse demographics. This study utilized survey-specific analytic tools in SAS 9.4 that account for the sampling framework, survey design, and reporting structure of the FFCWS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3,345 caregivers (unweighted count), 106 reported that their child stuttered or stammered. CVBWS reported lower CSS (2.97, <i>SD</i> = 1.06) than the CVBWNS (3.08, <i>SD</i> = 0.97)-a statistically significant difference (<i>t</i> = 2.51, <i>p</i> = .013). CVBWS also exhibited poorer social skills as indicated by a lower average SSRS rating (48.15 points, <i>SD</i> = 10.99) compared to CVBWNS (54.11 points, <i>SD</i> = 12.96; <i>t</i> = -3.77, <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When working with CVBWS, it is important that baseline and posttreatment measures encompass more than just speech production outcomes. Current findings support this position, as some CVBWS experience more negative social interactions within their school than CVBWNS. Therefore, it is critical that additional attention be paid to the social and emotional development of CVBWS.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"4673-4687"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Skills and Connectedness in School-Age Children From Vulnerable Backgrounds Who Stutter.\",\"authors\":\"Amber L Faircloth, Molly M Jacobs, Patrick M Briley\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exploring the psychosocial experiences of school-age children from vulnerable backgrounds who stutter allows for a better understanding of the compounding impacts of stuttering and challenging familial factors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were drawn from Wave 5 of the Future of Families and Child Wellbeing Study (FFCWS). This study evaluated social adaptability among children from vulnerable backgrounds who do stutter (CVBWS) and children from vulnerable backgrounds who do not stutter (CVBWNS) using two scales: the Social Skills Rating System (SSRS) and the Connectedness at School Scale (CSS). A comparison of means and regression analyses were used to compare the groups controlling for heterogeneity in diverse demographics. This study utilized survey-specific analytic tools in SAS 9.4 that account for the sampling framework, survey design, and reporting structure of the FFCWS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3,345 caregivers (unweighted count), 106 reported that their child stuttered or stammered. CVBWS reported lower CSS (2.97, <i>SD</i> = 1.06) than the CVBWNS (3.08, <i>SD</i> = 0.97)-a statistically significant difference (<i>t</i> = 2.51, <i>p</i> = .013). CVBWS also exhibited poorer social skills as indicated by a lower average SSRS rating (48.15 points, <i>SD</i> = 10.99) compared to CVBWNS (54.11 points, <i>SD</i> = 12.96; <i>t</i> = -3.77, <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When working with CVBWS, it is important that baseline and posttreatment measures encompass more than just speech production outcomes. Current findings support this position, as some CVBWS experience more negative social interactions within their school than CVBWNS. Therefore, it is critical that additional attention be paid to the social and emotional development of CVBWS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4673-4687\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00799\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨来自弱势背景的学龄口吃儿童的社会心理经历,以便更好地了解口吃和挑战性家庭因素的复合影响。方法:数据来自家庭未来与儿童健康研究(FFCWS)第五波。本研究采用社会技能评定系统(SSRS)和学校连通性量表(CSS)两种量表对背景脆弱的结巴儿童(CVBWS)和背景脆弱的非结巴儿童(CVBWNS)的社会适应能力进行了评估。采用均值比较和回归分析来比较不同人口统计学中控制异质性的组。本研究利用SAS 9.4中针对调查的分析工具来解释FFCWS的抽样框架、调查设计和报告结构。结果:在3345名照顾者(未加权计数)中,106名报告他们的孩子口吃或口吃。CVBWS报告的CSS (2.97, SD = 1.06)低于CVBWNS (3.08, SD = 0.97),差异有统计学意义(t = 2.51, p = 0.013)。与CVBWNS(54.11分,SD = 12.96; t = -3.77, p < .001)相比,CVBWS的SSRS平均评分(48.15分,SD = 10.99)也表现出较差的社交技能。结论:当与CVBWS一起工作时,重要的是基线和后处理措施不仅仅包括语音产生结果。目前的研究结果支持这一观点,因为一些CVBWS在学校比CVBWNS经历更多的负面社会互动。因此,对CVBWS的社会和情感发展给予额外的关注是至关重要的。
Social Skills and Connectedness in School-Age Children From Vulnerable Backgrounds Who Stutter.
Purpose: Exploring the psychosocial experiences of school-age children from vulnerable backgrounds who stutter allows for a better understanding of the compounding impacts of stuttering and challenging familial factors.
Method: Data were drawn from Wave 5 of the Future of Families and Child Wellbeing Study (FFCWS). This study evaluated social adaptability among children from vulnerable backgrounds who do stutter (CVBWS) and children from vulnerable backgrounds who do not stutter (CVBWNS) using two scales: the Social Skills Rating System (SSRS) and the Connectedness at School Scale (CSS). A comparison of means and regression analyses were used to compare the groups controlling for heterogeneity in diverse demographics. This study utilized survey-specific analytic tools in SAS 9.4 that account for the sampling framework, survey design, and reporting structure of the FFCWS.
Results: Of the 3,345 caregivers (unweighted count), 106 reported that their child stuttered or stammered. CVBWS reported lower CSS (2.97, SD = 1.06) than the CVBWNS (3.08, SD = 0.97)-a statistically significant difference (t = 2.51, p = .013). CVBWS also exhibited poorer social skills as indicated by a lower average SSRS rating (48.15 points, SD = 10.99) compared to CVBWNS (54.11 points, SD = 12.96; t = -3.77, p < .001).
Conclusions: When working with CVBWS, it is important that baseline and posttreatment measures encompass more than just speech production outcomes. Current findings support this position, as some CVBWS experience more negative social interactions within their school than CVBWNS. Therefore, it is critical that additional attention be paid to the social and emotional development of CVBWS.