有和没有早期儿童龋齿的乳牙的牙釉质厚度和密度:微型计算机断层扫描评估。

IF 2
R M Shetty, T Walia, M S Muthu, A Luke, E Berdouses, S S Yadadi, N Zahoor, A Saikia
{"title":"有和没有早期儿童龋齿的乳牙的牙釉质厚度和密度:微型计算机断层扫描评估。","authors":"R M Shetty, T Walia, M S Muthu, A Luke, E Berdouses, S S Yadadi, N Zahoor, A Saikia","doi":"10.1007/s40368-025-01098-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Differences in enamel density and thickness influence caries risk, emphasising their role in targeted early childhood caries (ECC) prevention. This study aims to compare the enamel thickness and density of unaffected enamel in primary teeth with ECC to that of caries-free (non-ECC) primary teeth using micro-computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 128 primary teeth were analysed and divided into two groups: Group I (unaffected surface of the enamel of primary teeth with ECC) and Group II (healthy teeth). Enamel thickness and density of healthy surfaces of both groups were measured using a μCT 100 system, and differences between groups were statistically evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enamel thickness was significantly higher in Group I (0.973 mg HA/ccm) compared to Group II (0.553 mg HA/ccm), with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). The mean enamel density in Group I was 2255.75 µm compared to 2294.71 µm in Group II (p = 0.001). In both the maxilla and mandible, Group II (healthy teeth) surfaces had higher enamel density (p = 0.001), whilst enamel thickness showed no significant difference. Amongst anterior teeth, Group II teeth surfaces exhibited significantly higher enamel density (p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enamel density, more than enamel thickness, emerges as a key indicator of ECC risk, enabling paediatric dentists to more accurately predict and identify vulnerable tooth surfaces before the onset of visible caries.</p>","PeriodicalId":520615,"journal":{"name":"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enamel thickness and density of primary teeth with and without early childhood caries: a micro-computer tomography assessment.\",\"authors\":\"R M Shetty, T Walia, M S Muthu, A Luke, E Berdouses, S S Yadadi, N Zahoor, A Saikia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40368-025-01098-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Differences in enamel density and thickness influence caries risk, emphasising their role in targeted early childhood caries (ECC) prevention. This study aims to compare the enamel thickness and density of unaffected enamel in primary teeth with ECC to that of caries-free (non-ECC) primary teeth using micro-computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 128 primary teeth were analysed and divided into two groups: Group I (unaffected surface of the enamel of primary teeth with ECC) and Group II (healthy teeth). Enamel thickness and density of healthy surfaces of both groups were measured using a μCT 100 system, and differences between groups were statistically evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enamel thickness was significantly higher in Group I (0.973 mg HA/ccm) compared to Group II (0.553 mg HA/ccm), with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). The mean enamel density in Group I was 2255.75 µm compared to 2294.71 µm in Group II (p = 0.001). In both the maxilla and mandible, Group II (healthy teeth) surfaces had higher enamel density (p = 0.001), whilst enamel thickness showed no significant difference. Amongst anterior teeth, Group II teeth surfaces exhibited significantly higher enamel density (p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enamel density, more than enamel thickness, emerges as a key indicator of ECC risk, enabling paediatric dentists to more accurately predict and identify vulnerable tooth surfaces before the onset of visible caries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-025-01098-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-025-01098-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:牙釉质密度和厚度的差异影响龋齿风险,强调其在针对性早期儿童龋齿(ECC)预防中的作用。本研究旨在利用微计算机断层扫描比较ECC乳牙与无龋乳牙的釉质厚度和密度。方法:对128颗乳牙进行分析,并将其分为两组:ⅰ组(乳牙釉质未受影响的乳牙表面)和ⅱ组(健康牙)。采用μCT - 100系统测量两组健康面牙釉质厚度和密度,采用Mann-Whitney U检验对两组间差异进行统计学分析。结果:ⅰ组牙釉质厚度(0.973 mg HA/ccm)明显高于ⅱ组(0.553 mg HA/ccm),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.001)。第一组的平均牙釉质密度为2255.75µm,第二组为2294.71µm (p = 0.001)。在上颌骨和下颌骨,II组(健康牙)表面的牙釉质密度较高(p = 0.001),而牙釉质厚度差异无统计学意义。在前牙中,第II组牙面牙釉质密度显著高于前组(p = 0.003)。结论:牙釉质密度比牙釉质厚度更能作为龋病风险的关键指标,使儿科牙医能够在可见龋病发生前更准确地预测和识别易受伤害的牙面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enamel thickness and density of primary teeth with and without early childhood caries: a micro-computer tomography assessment.

Purpose: Differences in enamel density and thickness influence caries risk, emphasising their role in targeted early childhood caries (ECC) prevention. This study aims to compare the enamel thickness and density of unaffected enamel in primary teeth with ECC to that of caries-free (non-ECC) primary teeth using micro-computed tomography.

Methods: A total of 128 primary teeth were analysed and divided into two groups: Group I (unaffected surface of the enamel of primary teeth with ECC) and Group II (healthy teeth). Enamel thickness and density of healthy surfaces of both groups were measured using a μCT 100 system, and differences between groups were statistically evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: Enamel thickness was significantly higher in Group I (0.973 mg HA/ccm) compared to Group II (0.553 mg HA/ccm), with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). The mean enamel density in Group I was 2255.75 µm compared to 2294.71 µm in Group II (p = 0.001). In both the maxilla and mandible, Group II (healthy teeth) surfaces had higher enamel density (p = 0.001), whilst enamel thickness showed no significant difference. Amongst anterior teeth, Group II teeth surfaces exhibited significantly higher enamel density (p = 0.003).

Conclusion: Enamel density, more than enamel thickness, emerges as a key indicator of ECC risk, enabling paediatric dentists to more accurately predict and identify vulnerable tooth surfaces before the onset of visible caries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信