Stefan Verheye, Bert Ferdinande, Johan Bennett, Rodolfo Staico, Seif El-Jack, Pim A. L. Tonino, Alexandre Abizaid, Ian Buysschaert, Douglas Scott, Madhav Menon, Gerard Wilkins, Dougal McClean, Tomas Kovarnik, Uwe Christians, Antoinette Neylon, Zlatko Mehmedbegovic, Pieter C. Smits, Marie-Claude Morice, Mark Webster, the DESyne BDS Plus RCT Investigators
{"title":"部位特异性抗血栓治疗:随机DESyne BDS Plus试验使用新型三药洗脱冠状动脉植入物与两种抗凝剂和西罗莫司的24个月结果。","authors":"Stefan Verheye, Bert Ferdinande, Johan Bennett, Rodolfo Staico, Seif El-Jack, Pim A. L. Tonino, Alexandre Abizaid, Ian Buysschaert, Douglas Scott, Madhav Menon, Gerard Wilkins, Dougal McClean, Tomas Kovarnik, Uwe Christians, Antoinette Neylon, Zlatko Mehmedbegovic, Pieter C. Smits, Marie-Claude Morice, Mark Webster, the DESyne BDS Plus RCT Investigators","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>DESyne BDS Plus represents a novel triple drug therapy (TRx) applied on a coronary stent platform eluting the antiproliferative drug Sirolimus along with two anticoagulants (Rivaroxaban and Argatroban) to reduce the site-specific thrombotic risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the feasibility and safety of this novel device against a contemporary drug-eluting stent.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective, multicenter randomized (1:1) trial included 202 patients assigned between the device group (DESyne BDS Plus) and the control group (DESyne X2). A subgroup of 58 patients underwent imaging follow-up at 6 months. The blood pharmacokinetics of Sirolimus and both anticoagulants were assessed in 11 nonrandomized patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The primary endpoint, target lesion failure (TLF) at discharge or 3-day postprocedure, whichever occurred first, was 0.0% (0/98) in the device and 5.0% (5/100) in the control group (<i>p</i><sub>noninferiority</sub> < 0.001). The secondary endpoint, late lumen loss at 6 months, was 0.14 mm [90% CI: 0.06; 0.23] and 0.09 mm [90% CI: 0.01; 0.18] in the device (<i>n</i> = 28) and control group (<i>n</i> = 27), respectively (<i>p</i><sub>noninferiority</sub> < 0.001). Through 24 months, stent thrombosis (definite/probable) was 0.0% (0/97) versus 1.0% (1/96) in the control, <i>p</i> = 0.497, and TLF was 2.1% (2/97) versus 11.3% (11/97), <i>p</i> = 0.010, respectively. Optical coherence tomography findings including strut coverage and neointimal hyperplasia thickness/volume were similar between the groups. The pharmacokinetic study indicated median maximum blood concentrations (C<sub>max</sub>) of Rivaroxaban and Argatroban of 1.38 ng/mL and 1.99 ng/mL, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This is the first clinical evidence of the feasibility of site-specific antithrombotic therapeutic with two anticoagulants and an antiproliferative mTOR inhibitor.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"106 4","pages":"2770-2780"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ccd.70106","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Site-Specific Antithrombotic Therapy: 24-Month Outcomes of the Randomized DESyne BDS Plus Trial Using a Novel Triple-Drug Eluting Coronary Implant With Two Anticoagulants and Sirolimus\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Verheye, Bert Ferdinande, Johan Bennett, Rodolfo Staico, Seif El-Jack, Pim A. L. Tonino, Alexandre Abizaid, Ian Buysschaert, Douglas Scott, Madhav Menon, Gerard Wilkins, Dougal McClean, Tomas Kovarnik, Uwe Christians, Antoinette Neylon, Zlatko Mehmedbegovic, Pieter C. Smits, Marie-Claude Morice, Mark Webster, the DESyne BDS Plus RCT Investigators\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.70106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>DESyne BDS Plus represents a novel triple drug therapy (TRx) applied on a coronary stent platform eluting the antiproliferative drug Sirolimus along with two anticoagulants (Rivaroxaban and Argatroban) to reduce the site-specific thrombotic risk.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the feasibility and safety of this novel device against a contemporary drug-eluting stent.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This prospective, multicenter randomized (1:1) trial included 202 patients assigned between the device group (DESyne BDS Plus) and the control group (DESyne X2). A subgroup of 58 patients underwent imaging follow-up at 6 months. The blood pharmacokinetics of Sirolimus and both anticoagulants were assessed in 11 nonrandomized patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The primary endpoint, target lesion failure (TLF) at discharge or 3-day postprocedure, whichever occurred first, was 0.0% (0/98) in the device and 5.0% (5/100) in the control group (<i>p</i><sub>noninferiority</sub> < 0.001). The secondary endpoint, late lumen loss at 6 months, was 0.14 mm [90% CI: 0.06; 0.23] and 0.09 mm [90% CI: 0.01; 0.18] in the device (<i>n</i> = 28) and control group (<i>n</i> = 27), respectively (<i>p</i><sub>noninferiority</sub> < 0.001). Through 24 months, stent thrombosis (definite/probable) was 0.0% (0/97) versus 1.0% (1/96) in the control, <i>p</i> = 0.497, and TLF was 2.1% (2/97) versus 11.3% (11/97), <i>p</i> = 0.010, respectively. Optical coherence tomography findings including strut coverage and neointimal hyperplasia thickness/volume were similar between the groups. The pharmacokinetic study indicated median maximum blood concentrations (C<sub>max</sub>) of Rivaroxaban and Argatroban of 1.38 ng/mL and 1.99 ng/mL, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This is the first clinical evidence of the feasibility of site-specific antithrombotic therapeutic with two anticoagulants and an antiproliferative mTOR inhibitor.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\"106 4\",\"pages\":\"2770-2780\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ccd.70106\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.70106\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.70106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Site-Specific Antithrombotic Therapy: 24-Month Outcomes of the Randomized DESyne BDS Plus Trial Using a Novel Triple-Drug Eluting Coronary Implant With Two Anticoagulants and Sirolimus
Background
DESyne BDS Plus represents a novel triple drug therapy (TRx) applied on a coronary stent platform eluting the antiproliferative drug Sirolimus along with two anticoagulants (Rivaroxaban and Argatroban) to reduce the site-specific thrombotic risk.
Aims
To assess the feasibility and safety of this novel device against a contemporary drug-eluting stent.
Methods
This prospective, multicenter randomized (1:1) trial included 202 patients assigned between the device group (DESyne BDS Plus) and the control group (DESyne X2). A subgroup of 58 patients underwent imaging follow-up at 6 months. The blood pharmacokinetics of Sirolimus and both anticoagulants were assessed in 11 nonrandomized patients.
Results
The primary endpoint, target lesion failure (TLF) at discharge or 3-day postprocedure, whichever occurred first, was 0.0% (0/98) in the device and 5.0% (5/100) in the control group (pnoninferiority < 0.001). The secondary endpoint, late lumen loss at 6 months, was 0.14 mm [90% CI: 0.06; 0.23] and 0.09 mm [90% CI: 0.01; 0.18] in the device (n = 28) and control group (n = 27), respectively (pnoninferiority < 0.001). Through 24 months, stent thrombosis (definite/probable) was 0.0% (0/97) versus 1.0% (1/96) in the control, p = 0.497, and TLF was 2.1% (2/97) versus 11.3% (11/97), p = 0.010, respectively. Optical coherence tomography findings including strut coverage and neointimal hyperplasia thickness/volume were similar between the groups. The pharmacokinetic study indicated median maximum blood concentrations (Cmax) of Rivaroxaban and Argatroban of 1.38 ng/mL and 1.99 ng/mL, respectively.
Conclusions
This is the first clinical evidence of the feasibility of site-specific antithrombotic therapeutic with two anticoagulants and an antiproliferative mTOR inhibitor.
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.