Hoda Nemat, Martin Orr, Lucy Barrow, Bindu Raobaikady, Sheila Matharu, Lisa Scerri, Udai Banerji, Ceire Costelloe
{"title":"回顾性研究合并症、多种药物和人口统计学因素对I期肿瘤试验患者纳入和医疗服务的影响。","authors":"Hoda Nemat, Martin Orr, Lucy Barrow, Bindu Raobaikady, Sheila Matharu, Lisa Scerri, Udai Banerji, Ceire Costelloe","doi":"10.1038/s44276-025-00165-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phase I trials include patients with metastatic cancer and complex health conditions. Understanding baseline comorbidity and demographic features is critical to improving trial design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used electronic patient records to study the association of comorbidity, polypharmacy, and demographic factors on trial recruitment, time on trial, and health service utilisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 1671 patients was considered for allocation to a phase I study, of whom 518 patients were recruited to a phase I study and 1153 patients were not. A multivariable analysis revealed polypharmacy was associated with lower recruitment to phase I trials with an odds ratio of 0.95 (95% CI: [0.92, 0.99], p = 0.01), and a greater number of emergency admissions with a risk ratio of 1.1 (95% CI: [1.03, 1.17], p = 0.01). Interestingly, comorbidity was not associated with lower recruitment but was associated with a lower time on trial with a hazard ratio of 0.75 (95% CI: [0.62, 0.90], p ≤ 0.001). Demographic factors, including ethnicity, distance of residence from the hospital, and index of multiple deprivation, did not significantly influence these parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Polypharmacy and comorbidity should be considered both in the design of phase I oncology trials and in planning for healthcare utilisation during these trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":519964,"journal":{"name":"BJC reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective study of the impact of comorbidity, polypharmacy and demographic factors on patient inclusion and healthcare delivery in phase I oncology trials.\",\"authors\":\"Hoda Nemat, Martin Orr, Lucy Barrow, Bindu Raobaikady, Sheila Matharu, Lisa Scerri, Udai Banerji, Ceire Costelloe\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44276-025-00165-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phase I trials include patients with metastatic cancer and complex health conditions. Understanding baseline comorbidity and demographic features is critical to improving trial design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used electronic patient records to study the association of comorbidity, polypharmacy, and demographic factors on trial recruitment, time on trial, and health service utilisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 1671 patients was considered for allocation to a phase I study, of whom 518 patients were recruited to a phase I study and 1153 patients were not. A multivariable analysis revealed polypharmacy was associated with lower recruitment to phase I trials with an odds ratio of 0.95 (95% CI: [0.92, 0.99], p = 0.01), and a greater number of emergency admissions with a risk ratio of 1.1 (95% CI: [1.03, 1.17], p = 0.01). Interestingly, comorbidity was not associated with lower recruitment but was associated with a lower time on trial with a hazard ratio of 0.75 (95% CI: [0.62, 0.90], p ≤ 0.001). Demographic factors, including ethnicity, distance of residence from the hospital, and index of multiple deprivation, did not significantly influence these parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Polypharmacy and comorbidity should be considered both in the design of phase I oncology trials and in planning for healthcare utilisation during these trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJC reports\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378352/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJC reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44276-025-00165-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJC reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44276-025-00165-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:I期试验包括转移性癌症和复杂健康状况的患者。了解基线合并症和人口统计学特征对改进试验设计至关重要。方法:我们使用电子病历研究合并症、多种用药和人口统计学因素与试验招募、试验时间和卫生服务利用的关系。结果:1671例患者被考虑分配到I期研究,其中518例患者被招募到I期研究,1153例患者未被招募。一项多变量分析显示,多药与较低的I期试验招募率相关,比值比为0.95 (95% CI: [0.92, 0.99], p = 0.01),与较多的急诊入院率相关,风险比为1.1 (95% CI: [1.03, 1.17], p = 0.01)。有趣的是,合并症与较低的招募率无关,但与较短的试验时间相关,风险比为0.75 (95% CI: [0.62, 0.90], p≤0.001)。人口因素,包括种族、居住地与医院的距离和多重剥夺指数,对这些参数没有显著影响。结论:在I期肿瘤学试验的设计和这些试验期间的医疗保健利用计划中,应考虑多种药物和合并症。
A retrospective study of the impact of comorbidity, polypharmacy and demographic factors on patient inclusion and healthcare delivery in phase I oncology trials.
Background: Phase I trials include patients with metastatic cancer and complex health conditions. Understanding baseline comorbidity and demographic features is critical to improving trial design.
Methods: We used electronic patient records to study the association of comorbidity, polypharmacy, and demographic factors on trial recruitment, time on trial, and health service utilisation.
Results: A cohort of 1671 patients was considered for allocation to a phase I study, of whom 518 patients were recruited to a phase I study and 1153 patients were not. A multivariable analysis revealed polypharmacy was associated with lower recruitment to phase I trials with an odds ratio of 0.95 (95% CI: [0.92, 0.99], p = 0.01), and a greater number of emergency admissions with a risk ratio of 1.1 (95% CI: [1.03, 1.17], p = 0.01). Interestingly, comorbidity was not associated with lower recruitment but was associated with a lower time on trial with a hazard ratio of 0.75 (95% CI: [0.62, 0.90], p ≤ 0.001). Demographic factors, including ethnicity, distance of residence from the hospital, and index of multiple deprivation, did not significantly influence these parameters.
Conclusion: Polypharmacy and comorbidity should be considered both in the design of phase I oncology trials and in planning for healthcare utilisation during these trials.