认知差异模式及其与情感性障碍的社会心理功能的关系。

IF 2.8 0 PSYCHIATRY
Muriel Vicent-Gil, Maria Serra-Blasco, Joan Trujols, Guillem Navarra-Ventura, Javier de Diego-Adeliño, Dolors Puigdemont, Carlo Alemany, Josefina Pérez, Maria J Portella, Narcís Cardoner
{"title":"认知差异模式及其与情感性障碍的社会心理功能的关系。","authors":"Muriel Vicent-Gil, Maria Serra-Blasco, Joan Trujols, Guillem Navarra-Ventura, Javier de Diego-Adeliño, Dolors Puigdemont, Carlo Alemany, Josefina Pérez, Maria J Portella, Narcís Cardoner","doi":"10.1016/j.sjpmh.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD) frequently exhibit a disagreement between self-reported and objectively measured cognitive performance. Research suggests that these cognitive discrepancies may vary across disorders and are not exclusive to a specific diagnosis, potentially being influenced by clinical and sociodemographic factors. Overestimating cognitive abilities is associated with better psychosocial functioning in depression, whereas heightened sensitivity to cognitive deficits correlates with worse functioning. However, these phenomena remain underexplored in both depression and bipolar disorder.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study of 200 participants, including 160 patients in full or partial clinical remission (94 with MDD and 66 with BD) and 40 healthy controls. Sociodemographic, clinical, and functional variables were collected, along with both subjective and objective cognitive measures. We conducted a multivariate binary logistic regression to identify factors associated with cognitive discrepancy patterns (under- vs overestimation). Finally, a two-way ANOVA tested the interaction between diagnosis and cognitive discrepancy patterns on psychosocial functioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with MDD tend to underestimate their cognitive abilities, while bipolar patients often overestimate theirs. Patients with higher depressive symptoms (B=-.045, p=.040) and higher intellectual level (B=-.241, p=<.001) report more subjective cognitive disturbances. Worse psychosocial functioning is not associated with underestimation but rather with the diagnosis itself (F=.63, p=.431), with bipolar disorder patients experiencing the most significant impact on daily functioning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Personalized cognitive assessments, integrating both objective and subjective measures, are of paramount importance to avoid generalizations and to accurately evaluate cognitive symptoms in patients with affective disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":101179,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive discrepancy patterns and their association with psychosocial functioning across affective disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Muriel Vicent-Gil, Maria Serra-Blasco, Joan Trujols, Guillem Navarra-Ventura, Javier de Diego-Adeliño, Dolors Puigdemont, Carlo Alemany, Josefina Pérez, Maria J Portella, Narcís Cardoner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sjpmh.2025.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD) frequently exhibit a disagreement between self-reported and objectively measured cognitive performance. Research suggests that these cognitive discrepancies may vary across disorders and are not exclusive to a specific diagnosis, potentially being influenced by clinical and sociodemographic factors. Overestimating cognitive abilities is associated with better psychosocial functioning in depression, whereas heightened sensitivity to cognitive deficits correlates with worse functioning. However, these phenomena remain underexplored in both depression and bipolar disorder.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study of 200 participants, including 160 patients in full or partial clinical remission (94 with MDD and 66 with BD) and 40 healthy controls. Sociodemographic, clinical, and functional variables were collected, along with both subjective and objective cognitive measures. We conducted a multivariate binary logistic regression to identify factors associated with cognitive discrepancy patterns (under- vs overestimation). Finally, a two-way ANOVA tested the interaction between diagnosis and cognitive discrepancy patterns on psychosocial functioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with MDD tend to underestimate their cognitive abilities, while bipolar patients often overestimate theirs. Patients with higher depressive symptoms (B=-.045, p=.040) and higher intellectual level (B=-.241, p=<.001) report more subjective cognitive disturbances. Worse psychosocial functioning is not associated with underestimation but rather with the diagnosis itself (F=.63, p=.431), with bipolar disorder patients experiencing the most significant impact on daily functioning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Personalized cognitive assessments, integrating both objective and subjective measures, are of paramount importance to avoid generalizations and to accurately evaluate cognitive symptoms in patients with affective disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpmh.2025.05.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpmh.2025.05.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重度抑郁障碍(MDD)和双相情感障碍(BD)患者经常表现出自我报告和客观测量的认知表现不一致。研究表明,这些认知差异可能因疾病而异,并非特定诊断所独有,可能受到临床和社会人口因素的影响。高估认知能力与抑郁症患者更好的社会心理功能有关,而对认知缺陷的高度敏感则与更差的功能有关。然而,这些现象在抑郁症和双相情感障碍中仍未得到充分研究。材料和方法:我们对200名参与者进行了一项横断面研究,包括160名完全或部分临床缓解的患者(94名重度抑郁症患者和66名双相障碍患者)和40名健康对照。收集了社会人口学、临床和功能变量,以及主观和客观认知测量。我们进行了多元二元逻辑回归,以确定与认知差异模式(低估与高估)相关的因素。最后,双向方差分析测试了诊断和认知差异模式在心理社会功能上的相互作用。结果:重度抑郁症患者倾向于低估自己的认知能力,而双相情感障碍患者往往高估自己的认知能力。高抑郁症状患者(B = - 0.045, p = 0.040)和高智力水平患者(B = - 0.241, p =)结论:结合客观和主观测量的个性化认知评估对于避免泛化和准确评估情感性障碍患者的认知症状至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive discrepancy patterns and their association with psychosocial functioning across affective disorders.

Introduction: Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD) frequently exhibit a disagreement between self-reported and objectively measured cognitive performance. Research suggests that these cognitive discrepancies may vary across disorders and are not exclusive to a specific diagnosis, potentially being influenced by clinical and sociodemographic factors. Overestimating cognitive abilities is associated with better psychosocial functioning in depression, whereas heightened sensitivity to cognitive deficits correlates with worse functioning. However, these phenomena remain underexplored in both depression and bipolar disorder.

Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 200 participants, including 160 patients in full or partial clinical remission (94 with MDD and 66 with BD) and 40 healthy controls. Sociodemographic, clinical, and functional variables were collected, along with both subjective and objective cognitive measures. We conducted a multivariate binary logistic regression to identify factors associated with cognitive discrepancy patterns (under- vs overestimation). Finally, a two-way ANOVA tested the interaction between diagnosis and cognitive discrepancy patterns on psychosocial functioning.

Results: Patients with MDD tend to underestimate their cognitive abilities, while bipolar patients often overestimate theirs. Patients with higher depressive symptoms (B=-.045, p=.040) and higher intellectual level (B=-.241, p=<.001) report more subjective cognitive disturbances. Worse psychosocial functioning is not associated with underestimation but rather with the diagnosis itself (F=.63, p=.431), with bipolar disorder patients experiencing the most significant impact on daily functioning.

Conclusions: Personalized cognitive assessments, integrating both objective and subjective measures, are of paramount importance to avoid generalizations and to accurately evaluate cognitive symptoms in patients with affective disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信