多卡因醇与平阳霉素治疗颌面部血管性疾病的疗效比较。

IF 1.5
Jing Yang, Zhi Tan, Qirong Liu, Li Shen, Hao Zhang, Ping Liu
{"title":"多卡因醇与平阳霉素治疗颌面部血管性疾病的疗效比较。","authors":"Jing Yang, Zhi Tan, Qirong Liu, Li Shen, Hao Zhang, Ping Liu","doi":"10.1177/02683555251365067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo study the clinical therapeutic effect of polidocanol injection in the treatment of maxillofacial vascular disorders, and to compare the therapeutic effect with that of Pingyangmycin.MethodsA total of 300 patients with maxillofacial vascular abnormalities from March 14, 2021 to January 9, 2022 were selected from a hospital and divided into hemangioma group, lymphatic vessel malformation group and venous malformation group. The treatment was divided into two groups: Pingyangmycin and polidocanol injection. By comparing the pain coefficient, adverse reactions, therapeutic effect and the effect of the two drugs on cells, the therapeutic effect and safety of the two drugs were comprehensively analyzed.ResultsUnder the same conditions, the infiltration rates of 5-bromodeoxyuracil into lymphoendothelial cells with different concentrations of polidocanol injection were 0.62%, 0.59%, 0.36%, 0.18% and 0.15%, respectively, which were better than Pingyangmycin. The protein kinase C expression levels of polidocanol injection with different concentrations were 1.01, 1.21, 1.02, 0.75 and 0.61, respectively, which were better than Pingyangmycin. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate of hemangioma patients treated with polidocanol injection were 88.64%, 80.77%, 94.23% and 100.00%, respectively. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate were 91.30%, 71.74%, 84.78% and 95.65%, respectively. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate of venous malformation patients were 90.00%, 92.00%, 98.00% and 100.00%, respectively. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate of hemangioma patients treated with Pingyangmycin were 92.59%, 64.81%, 88.89% and 98.15%, respectively. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate of patients with lymphatic vessel malformation were 94.00%, 54.00%, 84.00% and 94.00% respectively. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate of venous malformation patients were 95.83%, 75.00%, 91.67% and 100.00%, respectively.ConclusionPolidocanol injection is better than Pingyangmycin in the treatment of maxillofacial vascular disorders, and the drug is milder, less adverse reactions and higher safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555251365067"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic efficacy of the polidocanol versus pingyangmycin in the treatment of maxillofacial vascular disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Jing Yang, Zhi Tan, Qirong Liu, Li Shen, Hao Zhang, Ping Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555251365067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveTo study the clinical therapeutic effect of polidocanol injection in the treatment of maxillofacial vascular disorders, and to compare the therapeutic effect with that of Pingyangmycin.MethodsA total of 300 patients with maxillofacial vascular abnormalities from March 14, 2021 to January 9, 2022 were selected from a hospital and divided into hemangioma group, lymphatic vessel malformation group and venous malformation group. The treatment was divided into two groups: Pingyangmycin and polidocanol injection. By comparing the pain coefficient, adverse reactions, therapeutic effect and the effect of the two drugs on cells, the therapeutic effect and safety of the two drugs were comprehensively analyzed.ResultsUnder the same conditions, the infiltration rates of 5-bromodeoxyuracil into lymphoendothelial cells with different concentrations of polidocanol injection were 0.62%, 0.59%, 0.36%, 0.18% and 0.15%, respectively, which were better than Pingyangmycin. The protein kinase C expression levels of polidocanol injection with different concentrations were 1.01, 1.21, 1.02, 0.75 and 0.61, respectively, which were better than Pingyangmycin. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate of hemangioma patients treated with polidocanol injection were 88.64%, 80.77%, 94.23% and 100.00%, respectively. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate were 91.30%, 71.74%, 84.78% and 95.65%, respectively. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate of venous malformation patients were 90.00%, 92.00%, 98.00% and 100.00%, respectively. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate of hemangioma patients treated with Pingyangmycin were 92.59%, 64.81%, 88.89% and 98.15%, respectively. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate of patients with lymphatic vessel malformation were 94.00%, 54.00%, 84.00% and 94.00% respectively. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate of venous malformation patients were 95.83%, 75.00%, 91.67% and 100.00%, respectively.ConclusionPolidocanol injection is better than Pingyangmycin in the treatment of maxillofacial vascular disorders, and the drug is milder, less adverse reactions and higher safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2683555251365067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251365067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251365067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的观察多尼多醇注射液治疗颌面部血管性疾病的临床疗效,并与平阳霉素的疗效进行比较。方法选择某医院于2021年3月14日至2022年1月9日收治的颌面部血管异常患者300例,分为血管瘤组、淋巴管畸形组和静脉畸形组。治疗分为两组:平阳霉素组和聚多卡因组。通过比较两种药物的疼痛系数、不良反应、治疗效果及对细胞的影响,综合分析两种药物的治疗效果及安全性。结果在相同条件下,5-溴脱氧尿嘧啶对淋巴内皮细胞的浸润率分别为0.62%、0.59%、0.36%、0.18%和0.15%,均优于平阳霉素。不同浓度多元醇注射液的蛋白激酶C表达量分别为1.01、1.21、1.02、0.75、0.61,均优于平阳霉素。聚多卡因注射液治疗血管瘤患者的不良反应率为88.64%,治愈率为80.77%,有效率为94.23%,总有效率为100.00%。不良反应率、治愈率、有效率和总有效率分别为91.30%、71.74%、84.78%和95.65%。静脉畸形患者的不良反应率、治愈率、有效率和总有效率分别为90.00%、92.00%、98.00%和100.00%。平阳霉素治疗血管瘤患者的不良反应率、治愈率、有效率和总有效率分别为92.59%、64.81%、88.89%和98.15%。不良反应率、治愈率、有效率和总有效率分别为94.00%、54.00%、84.00%和94.00%。静脉畸形患者的不良反应率为95.83%,治愈率为75.00%,有效率为91.67%,总有效率为100.00%。结论聚多卡因注射液治疗颌面部血管性疾病优于平阳霉素,且用药温和、不良反应少、安全性高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Therapeutic efficacy of the polidocanol versus pingyangmycin in the treatment of maxillofacial vascular disorders.

ObjectiveTo study the clinical therapeutic effect of polidocanol injection in the treatment of maxillofacial vascular disorders, and to compare the therapeutic effect with that of Pingyangmycin.MethodsA total of 300 patients with maxillofacial vascular abnormalities from March 14, 2021 to January 9, 2022 were selected from a hospital and divided into hemangioma group, lymphatic vessel malformation group and venous malformation group. The treatment was divided into two groups: Pingyangmycin and polidocanol injection. By comparing the pain coefficient, adverse reactions, therapeutic effect and the effect of the two drugs on cells, the therapeutic effect and safety of the two drugs were comprehensively analyzed.ResultsUnder the same conditions, the infiltration rates of 5-bromodeoxyuracil into lymphoendothelial cells with different concentrations of polidocanol injection were 0.62%, 0.59%, 0.36%, 0.18% and 0.15%, respectively, which were better than Pingyangmycin. The protein kinase C expression levels of polidocanol injection with different concentrations were 1.01, 1.21, 1.02, 0.75 and 0.61, respectively, which were better than Pingyangmycin. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate of hemangioma patients treated with polidocanol injection were 88.64%, 80.77%, 94.23% and 100.00%, respectively. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate were 91.30%, 71.74%, 84.78% and 95.65%, respectively. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate of venous malformation patients were 90.00%, 92.00%, 98.00% and 100.00%, respectively. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate of hemangioma patients treated with Pingyangmycin were 92.59%, 64.81%, 88.89% and 98.15%, respectively. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate of patients with lymphatic vessel malformation were 94.00%, 54.00%, 84.00% and 94.00% respectively. The adverse reaction rate, cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate of venous malformation patients were 95.83%, 75.00%, 91.67% and 100.00%, respectively.ConclusionPolidocanol injection is better than Pingyangmycin in the treatment of maxillofacial vascular disorders, and the drug is milder, less adverse reactions and higher safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信