小儿烧伤中心耳念珠菌感染:治疗和感染控制措施。

IF 0.9
Northern clinics of Istanbul Pub Date : 2025-06-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.14744/nci.2024.26429
Seval Ozen, Belgin Gulhan, Sabri Demir, Sema Turan Uzuntas, Aysun Yahsi, Saliha Kanik-Yüksek, Tugba Erat, Ahmet Yasin Guney, Latife Guder, Gulsum Iclal Bayhan, Bedia Dinc, Mujdem Nur Azili, Emrah Senel, Aslinur Ozkaya Parlakay
{"title":"小儿烧伤中心耳念珠菌感染:治疗和感染控制措施。","authors":"Seval Ozen, Belgin Gulhan, Sabri Demir, Sema Turan Uzuntas, Aysun Yahsi, Saliha Kanik-Yüksek, Tugba Erat, Ahmet Yasin Guney, Latife Guder, Gulsum Iclal Bayhan, Bedia Dinc, Mujdem Nur Azili, Emrah Senel, Aslinur Ozkaya Parlakay","doi":"10.14744/nci.2024.26429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong><i>Candida auris (C. auris)</i>, a novel species, has been increasingly associated with hospital outbreaks worldwide in recent years. C. auris is regarded as a global health problem due to issues with the identification of C. auris, variable antifungal resistance profiles and the requirement for infection prevention and control (IPC) measures. With this study, we aimed to present our experience with two patients with C. auris fungemia who were referred to the Pediatric Burn Center of our hospital at different timepoints and share the antifungal treatment strategy and IPC management policies implemented in the clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>C. auris isolates were identified using MALDI-TOF MS (VITEK MS, bioMérieux, France). Antifungal susceptibility tests were performed at the Turkish Public Health Institution (THSK) using the broth microdilution (BMD) method. The BMD was carried out in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A patient (3-year-old girl) with C. auris which was identified at an external center and negative fungal screening results was transferred to our pediatric burn center. On the 41<sup>st</sup> day of her hospitalization, she was diagnosed with catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) by C. auris. She received antifungal treatment for a total of 52 days, including caspofungin for 12 days, followed by micafungin for 40 days. Three months after the detection of the index case, a second patient (2-year-old girl) was diagnosed with CRBSI by C. auris on the 27<sup>th</sup> day of hospitalization. This patient received antifungal treatment for a total of 42 days, including 30 days of combination therapy (liposomal amphotericin B and voriconazole). Immediately after the recognition of the index C. auris case, infection prevention and control (IPC) measures were formulated and implemented. IPC measures included strict isolation of the patient infected with C. auris, and screening of all other patients and the environment. C. auris was not detected in any of the patients screened. None of the environmental swabs tested positive for C. auris.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Collaboration between clinical microbiology laboratories and the IPC committee is essential for making correct and early diagnosis, optimizing the management of precautions and reducing the spread of infection in the hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":94347,"journal":{"name":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","volume":"12 3","pages":"285-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12365476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Candida auris</i> infection at a pediatric burn center: Treatment and infection control measures.\",\"authors\":\"Seval Ozen, Belgin Gulhan, Sabri Demir, Sema Turan Uzuntas, Aysun Yahsi, Saliha Kanik-Yüksek, Tugba Erat, Ahmet Yasin Guney, Latife Guder, Gulsum Iclal Bayhan, Bedia Dinc, Mujdem Nur Azili, Emrah Senel, Aslinur Ozkaya Parlakay\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/nci.2024.26429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong><i>Candida auris (C. auris)</i>, a novel species, has been increasingly associated with hospital outbreaks worldwide in recent years. C. auris is regarded as a global health problem due to issues with the identification of C. auris, variable antifungal resistance profiles and the requirement for infection prevention and control (IPC) measures. With this study, we aimed to present our experience with two patients with C. auris fungemia who were referred to the Pediatric Burn Center of our hospital at different timepoints and share the antifungal treatment strategy and IPC management policies implemented in the clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>C. auris isolates were identified using MALDI-TOF MS (VITEK MS, bioMérieux, France). Antifungal susceptibility tests were performed at the Turkish Public Health Institution (THSK) using the broth microdilution (BMD) method. The BMD was carried out in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A patient (3-year-old girl) with C. auris which was identified at an external center and negative fungal screening results was transferred to our pediatric burn center. On the 41<sup>st</sup> day of her hospitalization, she was diagnosed with catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) by C. auris. She received antifungal treatment for a total of 52 days, including caspofungin for 12 days, followed by micafungin for 40 days. Three months after the detection of the index case, a second patient (2-year-old girl) was diagnosed with CRBSI by C. auris on the 27<sup>th</sup> day of hospitalization. This patient received antifungal treatment for a total of 42 days, including 30 days of combination therapy (liposomal amphotericin B and voriconazole). Immediately after the recognition of the index C. auris case, infection prevention and control (IPC) measures were formulated and implemented. IPC measures included strict isolation of the patient infected with C. auris, and screening of all other patients and the environment. C. auris was not detected in any of the patients screened. None of the environmental swabs tested positive for C. auris.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Collaboration between clinical microbiology laboratories and the IPC committee is essential for making correct and early diagnosis, optimizing the management of precautions and reducing the spread of infection in the hospital.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Northern clinics of Istanbul\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"285-289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12365476/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Northern clinics of Istanbul\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2024.26429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2024.26429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:耳念珠菌(C. auris)是一种新型真菌,近年来在世界范围内与医院暴发的关系日益密切。由于auris的鉴定、多变的抗真菌耐药性特征以及感染预防和控制措施的要求等问题,auris被视为一个全球性的卫生问题。通过这项研究,我们旨在介绍我们在不同时间点转诊到我院儿科烧伤中心的两例耳c菌真菌血症患者的经验,并分享临床实施的抗真菌治疗策略和IPC管理政策。方法:采用MALDI-TOF质谱(VITEK MS, biomrieux, France)对金黄色葡萄球菌进行分离鉴定。在土耳其公共卫生机构(THSK)采用肉汤微量稀释(BMD)法进行抗真菌药敏试验。BMD按照临床和实验室标准协会的程序进行。结果:一名患者(3岁女孩)在外部中心发现了金黄色葡萄球菌,真菌筛查结果为阴性,被转移到我们的儿科烧伤中心。在住院的第41天,她被C. auris诊断为导管相关性血流感染(CRBSI)。患者接受抗真菌治疗共52天,其中卡泊芬净12天,米卡芬净40天。在首例病例发现3个月后,第二例患者(2岁女童)在住院第27天被C. auris诊断为CRBSI。患者共接受抗真菌治疗42天,其中联合治疗30天(两性霉素B脂质体联合伏立康唑)。在发现指数型耳念珠菌病例后,立即制定并实施了感染防控措施。IPC措施包括严格隔离感染耳念珠菌的患者,并对所有其他患者和环境进行筛查。在筛选的所有患者中均未检测到金黄色葡萄球菌。所有环境拭子均未检测出金黄色葡萄球菌阳性。结论:临床微生物学实验室与IPC委员会的合作对正确早期诊断、优化预防管理、减少医院感染传播至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Candida auris infection at a pediatric burn center: Treatment and infection control measures.

Objective: Candida auris (C. auris), a novel species, has been increasingly associated with hospital outbreaks worldwide in recent years. C. auris is regarded as a global health problem due to issues with the identification of C. auris, variable antifungal resistance profiles and the requirement for infection prevention and control (IPC) measures. With this study, we aimed to present our experience with two patients with C. auris fungemia who were referred to the Pediatric Burn Center of our hospital at different timepoints and share the antifungal treatment strategy and IPC management policies implemented in the clinic.

Methods: C. auris isolates were identified using MALDI-TOF MS (VITEK MS, bioMérieux, France). Antifungal susceptibility tests were performed at the Turkish Public Health Institution (THSK) using the broth microdilution (BMD) method. The BMD was carried out in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute procedures.

Results: A patient (3-year-old girl) with C. auris which was identified at an external center and negative fungal screening results was transferred to our pediatric burn center. On the 41st day of her hospitalization, she was diagnosed with catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) by C. auris. She received antifungal treatment for a total of 52 days, including caspofungin for 12 days, followed by micafungin for 40 days. Three months after the detection of the index case, a second patient (2-year-old girl) was diagnosed with CRBSI by C. auris on the 27th day of hospitalization. This patient received antifungal treatment for a total of 42 days, including 30 days of combination therapy (liposomal amphotericin B and voriconazole). Immediately after the recognition of the index C. auris case, infection prevention and control (IPC) measures were formulated and implemented. IPC measures included strict isolation of the patient infected with C. auris, and screening of all other patients and the environment. C. auris was not detected in any of the patients screened. None of the environmental swabs tested positive for C. auris.

Conclusion: Collaboration between clinical microbiology laboratories and the IPC committee is essential for making correct and early diagnosis, optimizing the management of precautions and reducing the spread of infection in the hospital.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信