一键共登记T2标测和双黑、亮血晚期钆增强MRI综合评价急性STEMI后心肌损伤。

European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice Pub Date : 2025-08-11 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf103
Aurelien Bustin, Victor de Villedon de Naide, Edouard Gerbaud, Thaïs Génisson, Kalvin Narceau, Théo Richard, Konstantinos Vlachos, Guido Caluori, Claire Bazin, Soumaya Sridi, Ilyes Benlala, Gael Dournes, Maxime Sermesant, Michel Montaudon, Pierre Jaïs, Matthias Stuber, Hubert Cochet
{"title":"一键共登记T2标测和双黑、亮血晚期钆增强MRI综合评价急性STEMI后心肌损伤。","authors":"Aurelien Bustin, Victor de Villedon de Naide, Edouard Gerbaud, Thaïs Génisson, Kalvin Narceau, Théo Richard, Konstantinos Vlachos, Guido Caluori, Claire Bazin, Soumaya Sridi, Ilyes Benlala, Gael Dournes, Maxime Sermesant, Michel Montaudon, Pierre Jaïs, Matthias Stuber, Hubert Cochet","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, ischaemia and reperfusion lead to a cascade of myocardial injury that can be characterized by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, including coagulation necrosis, oedema, papillary muscle damage, microvascular obstruction, and intramyocardial haemorrhage. Conventional CMR protocols require multiple sequences to be performed and complicated analysis. This study evaluates SPOT-MAPPING, a sequence that acquires co-registered T2 maps and dual bright- and black-blood late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images in a single scan.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>SPOT-MAPPING employs a single-shot, ECG-triggered 2D sequence alternating between bright- and black-blood LGE imaging with varying T2 weightings. We prospectively enrolled 20 STEMI patients undergoing CMR at 1.5 T within 4-7 days post-emergent coronary intervention. SPOT-MAPPING's segmentation times and reproducibility of myocardial injury markers (oedema, scar size, transmurality, papillary muscle damage) were assessed against conventional T2 mapping and phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR). SPOT-MAPPING halved left ventricular wall segmentation time (∼3 min) while maintaining high reproducibility for oedema, scar size, and transmurality (ICC > 0.8). It improved papillary muscle damage detection over PSIR (8 vs. 3 patients) and showed comparable T2 values with conventional T2 mapping (remote: 45.0 ± 3.6 ms vs. 45.9 ± 3.7 ms, <i>P</i> = 0.746; oedema: 67.6 ± 10.3 ms vs. 71.8 ± 8.6 ms, <i>P</i> = 0.373). Agreement with PSIR for scar quantification was strong (mean bias: volume +1.5 mL, size +2.9%, transmurality +2.8%). SPOT-MAPPING demonstrated higher inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for scar size as a percentage of oedema volume compared with PSIR combined with conventional T2 mapping (ICC = 0.98 vs. 0.89 and 0.93 vs. 0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SPOT-MAPPING offers a time-efficient and reproducible CMR method for myocardial injury assessment post-STEMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":94317,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","volume":"3 2","pages":"qyaf103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-click co-registered T2 mapping and dual black- and bright-blood late gadolinium enhancement MRI for comprehensive assessment of myocardial injury after acute STEMI.\",\"authors\":\"Aurelien Bustin, Victor de Villedon de Naide, Edouard Gerbaud, Thaïs Génisson, Kalvin Narceau, Théo Richard, Konstantinos Vlachos, Guido Caluori, Claire Bazin, Soumaya Sridi, Ilyes Benlala, Gael Dournes, Maxime Sermesant, Michel Montaudon, Pierre Jaïs, Matthias Stuber, Hubert Cochet\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, ischaemia and reperfusion lead to a cascade of myocardial injury that can be characterized by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, including coagulation necrosis, oedema, papillary muscle damage, microvascular obstruction, and intramyocardial haemorrhage. Conventional CMR protocols require multiple sequences to be performed and complicated analysis. This study evaluates SPOT-MAPPING, a sequence that acquires co-registered T2 maps and dual bright- and black-blood late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images in a single scan.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>SPOT-MAPPING employs a single-shot, ECG-triggered 2D sequence alternating between bright- and black-blood LGE imaging with varying T2 weightings. We prospectively enrolled 20 STEMI patients undergoing CMR at 1.5 T within 4-7 days post-emergent coronary intervention. SPOT-MAPPING's segmentation times and reproducibility of myocardial injury markers (oedema, scar size, transmurality, papillary muscle damage) were assessed against conventional T2 mapping and phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR). SPOT-MAPPING halved left ventricular wall segmentation time (∼3 min) while maintaining high reproducibility for oedema, scar size, and transmurality (ICC > 0.8). It improved papillary muscle damage detection over PSIR (8 vs. 3 patients) and showed comparable T2 values with conventional T2 mapping (remote: 45.0 ± 3.6 ms vs. 45.9 ± 3.7 ms, <i>P</i> = 0.746; oedema: 67.6 ± 10.3 ms vs. 71.8 ± 8.6 ms, <i>P</i> = 0.373). Agreement with PSIR for scar quantification was strong (mean bias: volume +1.5 mL, size +2.9%, transmurality +2.8%). SPOT-MAPPING demonstrated higher inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for scar size as a percentage of oedema volume compared with PSIR combined with conventional T2 mapping (ICC = 0.98 vs. 0.89 and 0.93 vs. 0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SPOT-MAPPING offers a time-efficient and reproducible CMR method for myocardial injury assessment post-STEMI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"qyaf103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372463/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在急性st段抬高型心肌梗死中,缺血和再灌注导致心肌级联损伤,可通过心脏磁共振(CMR)成像表征,包括凝血坏死、水肿、乳头状肌损伤、微血管阻塞和心内出血。传统的CMR方案需要执行多个序列和复杂的分析。这项研究评估了SPOT-MAPPING,这是一个序列,在一次扫描中获得共同注册的T2图谱和双亮血和黑血晚期钆增强(LGE)图像。方法和结果:点成像采用单次心电图触发的2D序列,在不同T2权重的亮血和黑血LGE成像之间交替进行。我们前瞻性地招募了20名STEMI患者,在紧急冠状动脉介入治疗后4-7天内接受1.5 T的CMR。与常规T2成像和相敏反转恢复(PSIR)相比,对点阵成像的分割时间和心肌损伤标志物(水肿、疤痕大小、跨壁性、乳头状肌损伤)的可重复性进行评估。点阵图缩短了左心室壁分割时间(~ 3分钟),同时保持了对水肿、疤痕大小和跨壁性的高再现性(ICC > 0.8)。与PSIR相比,它改善了乳头肌损伤的检测(8例对3例),T2值与常规T2测图相当(远程测图:45.0±3.6 ms对45.9±3.7 ms, P = 0.746;水肿:67.6±10.3 ms对71.8±8.6 ms, P = 0.373)。与PSIR在疤痕定量方面的一致性很强(平均偏差:体积+1.5 mL,大小+2.9%,跨壁性+2.8%)。与PSIR联合常规T2作图相比,斑点作图显示疤痕大小占水肿体积的百分比在观察者间和观察者内具有更高的再现性(ICC = 0.98对0.89,0.93对0.85)。结论:点成像为stemi后心肌损伤评估提供了一种高效、可重复的CMR方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One-click co-registered T2 mapping and dual black- and bright-blood late gadolinium enhancement MRI for comprehensive assessment of myocardial injury after acute STEMI.

Aims: In acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, ischaemia and reperfusion lead to a cascade of myocardial injury that can be characterized by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, including coagulation necrosis, oedema, papillary muscle damage, microvascular obstruction, and intramyocardial haemorrhage. Conventional CMR protocols require multiple sequences to be performed and complicated analysis. This study evaluates SPOT-MAPPING, a sequence that acquires co-registered T2 maps and dual bright- and black-blood late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images in a single scan.

Methods and results: SPOT-MAPPING employs a single-shot, ECG-triggered 2D sequence alternating between bright- and black-blood LGE imaging with varying T2 weightings. We prospectively enrolled 20 STEMI patients undergoing CMR at 1.5 T within 4-7 days post-emergent coronary intervention. SPOT-MAPPING's segmentation times and reproducibility of myocardial injury markers (oedema, scar size, transmurality, papillary muscle damage) were assessed against conventional T2 mapping and phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR). SPOT-MAPPING halved left ventricular wall segmentation time (∼3 min) while maintaining high reproducibility for oedema, scar size, and transmurality (ICC > 0.8). It improved papillary muscle damage detection over PSIR (8 vs. 3 patients) and showed comparable T2 values with conventional T2 mapping (remote: 45.0 ± 3.6 ms vs. 45.9 ± 3.7 ms, P = 0.746; oedema: 67.6 ± 10.3 ms vs. 71.8 ± 8.6 ms, P = 0.373). Agreement with PSIR for scar quantification was strong (mean bias: volume +1.5 mL, size +2.9%, transmurality +2.8%). SPOT-MAPPING demonstrated higher inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for scar size as a percentage of oedema volume compared with PSIR combined with conventional T2 mapping (ICC = 0.98 vs. 0.89 and 0.93 vs. 0.85).

Conclusion: SPOT-MAPPING offers a time-efficient and reproducible CMR method for myocardial injury assessment post-STEMI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信