通过safari探索Dropbox图像下载到iPhone:文件系统与相机胶卷验证研究。

IF 1.8
Alexander E Nash, Tierney Moe, Gregory S Wales
{"title":"通过safari探索Dropbox图像下载到iPhone:文件系统与相机胶卷验证研究。","authors":"Alexander E Nash, Tierney Moe, Gregory S Wales","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.70173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the forensic integrity of digital images transferred from Dropbox to iPhones via Safari, a practical scenario for evidence collection when specialized tools are unavailable. Using a quantitative, quasi-experimental design, we analyzed 60 images across three iPhones (running iOS 14.2 and 14.4) to compare downloads to the Files folder and the Photos application. Controlled tests validated measurement sensitivity, while results revealed consistent image content integrity: cryptographic Secure Hash Algorithm 256 (SHA256) stream hashes matched control copies (100%), confirming unchanged pixel data. Additionally, Multiscale Structural Similarity Index (MS-SSIM) scores remained at 1.0, indicating no perceptible degradation in image quality. However, file container hashes were altered within the Photos application (100%) but remained unchanged in the Files folder (0%), reflecting iOS structural modifications. Uniform MS-SSIM scores precluded meaningful regression analysis. Based on our test conditions, the findings suggest forensic workflows comply with standards like Daubert because the transfer preserves content integrity. Limited to specific configurations, future work should explore diverse iOS versions, cloud platforms, and devices for broader applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":94080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Dropbox image downloads to iPhone via safari: File system versus camera roll validation study.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander E Nash, Tierney Moe, Gregory S Wales\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1556-4029.70173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated the forensic integrity of digital images transferred from Dropbox to iPhones via Safari, a practical scenario for evidence collection when specialized tools are unavailable. Using a quantitative, quasi-experimental design, we analyzed 60 images across three iPhones (running iOS 14.2 and 14.4) to compare downloads to the Files folder and the Photos application. Controlled tests validated measurement sensitivity, while results revealed consistent image content integrity: cryptographic Secure Hash Algorithm 256 (SHA256) stream hashes matched control copies (100%), confirming unchanged pixel data. Additionally, Multiscale Structural Similarity Index (MS-SSIM) scores remained at 1.0, indicating no perceptible degradation in image quality. However, file container hashes were altered within the Photos application (100%) but remained unchanged in the Files folder (0%), reflecting iOS structural modifications. Uniform MS-SSIM scores precluded meaningful regression analysis. Based on our test conditions, the findings suggest forensic workflows comply with standards like Daubert because the transfer preserves content integrity. Limited to specific configurations, future work should explore diverse iOS versions, cloud platforms, and devices for broader applicability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of forensic sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of forensic sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了通过Safari从Dropbox传输到iphone的数字图像的法医完整性,这是在没有专业工具时收集证据的实际情况。我们采用了一种定量的准实验设计,分析了三台iphone(分别运行iOS 14.2和14.4)上的60张图片,比较了Files文件夹和Photos应用程序的下载量。受控测试验证了测量灵敏度,而结果显示了一致的图像内容完整性:加密安全哈希算法256 (SHA256)流哈希匹配控制副本(100%),确认未改变的像素数据。此外,多尺度结构相似指数(MS-SSIM)得分保持在1.0,表明图像质量没有明显下降。然而,在照片应用程序中,文件容器哈希值被改变了(100%),但在Files文件夹中保持不变(0%),这反映了iOS的结构修改。统一的MS-SSIM评分排除了有意义的回归分析。根据我们的测试条件,结果表明取证工作流程符合像Daubert这样的标准,因为传输保持了内容的完整性。限于特定的配置,未来的工作应该探索不同的iOS版本、云平台和设备,以获得更广泛的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Dropbox image downloads to iPhone via safari: File system versus camera roll validation study.

This study evaluated the forensic integrity of digital images transferred from Dropbox to iPhones via Safari, a practical scenario for evidence collection when specialized tools are unavailable. Using a quantitative, quasi-experimental design, we analyzed 60 images across three iPhones (running iOS 14.2 and 14.4) to compare downloads to the Files folder and the Photos application. Controlled tests validated measurement sensitivity, while results revealed consistent image content integrity: cryptographic Secure Hash Algorithm 256 (SHA256) stream hashes matched control copies (100%), confirming unchanged pixel data. Additionally, Multiscale Structural Similarity Index (MS-SSIM) scores remained at 1.0, indicating no perceptible degradation in image quality. However, file container hashes were altered within the Photos application (100%) but remained unchanged in the Files folder (0%), reflecting iOS structural modifications. Uniform MS-SSIM scores precluded meaningful regression analysis. Based on our test conditions, the findings suggest forensic workflows comply with standards like Daubert because the transfer preserves content integrity. Limited to specific configurations, future work should explore diverse iOS versions, cloud platforms, and devices for broader applicability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信