地塞米松增强麻醉剂对第三磨牙拔牙术后疼痛、水肿和牙关紧闭的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2.7
I A Fernandes, A C R Protásio, I D'Angelis, M R L Lopes, M N L Baracho, S G M Falci, G M de Souza
{"title":"地塞米松增强麻醉剂对第三磨牙拔牙术后疼痛、水肿和牙关紧闭的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"I A Fernandes, A C R Protásio, I D'Angelis, M R L Lopes, M N L Baracho, S G M Falci, G M de Souza","doi":"10.1016/j.ijom.2025.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The extraction of third molars (3Ms) is frequently associated with postoperative inflammation and discomfort. This systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy of combining local anaesthetics with dexamethasone (treatment group) versus local anaesthetics alone (control group) in 3M surgeries. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Virtual Health Library, and Embase was conducted on June 9, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing outcomes such as pain, oedema, and trismus. Of 300 studies initially identified, nine met inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis, and eight were included in the meta-analyses. These studies involved 406 patients and 539 3Ms. The treatment group showed significant improvements in postoperative pain, facial oedema (days 1, 3, and 7), trismus (days 3 and 7), anaesthesia onset time, anaesthesia duration, and pain during anaesthetic injection. Overall, the addition of dexamethasone significantly enhanced clinical outcomes compared to anaesthetics alone. However, the certainty of the evidence remains low due to methodological limitations in the included trials. Further high-quality RCTs, rigorously adhering to standardized protocols, are essential to reduce bias and strengthen the reliability of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94053,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of dexamethasone-enhanced anaesthetics on postoperative pain, oedema, and trismus following third molar extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"I A Fernandes, A C R Protásio, I D'Angelis, M R L Lopes, M N L Baracho, S G M Falci, G M de Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijom.2025.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The extraction of third molars (3Ms) is frequently associated with postoperative inflammation and discomfort. This systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy of combining local anaesthetics with dexamethasone (treatment group) versus local anaesthetics alone (control group) in 3M surgeries. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Virtual Health Library, and Embase was conducted on June 9, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing outcomes such as pain, oedema, and trismus. Of 300 studies initially identified, nine met inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis, and eight were included in the meta-analyses. These studies involved 406 patients and 539 3Ms. The treatment group showed significant improvements in postoperative pain, facial oedema (days 1, 3, and 7), trismus (days 3 and 7), anaesthesia onset time, anaesthesia duration, and pain during anaesthetic injection. Overall, the addition of dexamethasone significantly enhanced clinical outcomes compared to anaesthetics alone. However, the certainty of the evidence remains low due to methodological limitations in the included trials. Further high-quality RCTs, rigorously adhering to standardized protocols, are essential to reduce bias and strengthen the reliability of these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2025.08.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2025.08.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第三磨牙(3Ms)的拔除通常与术后炎症和不适有关。本系统综述旨在比较局部麻醉联合地塞米松(治疗组)与单独局部麻醉(对照组)在3M手术中的疗效。2025年6月9日,我们对PubMed、Cochrane CENTRAL、Virtual Health Library和Embase进行了全面检索,以确定评估疼痛、水肿和牙牙紧闭等结果的随机对照试验(rct)。在最初确定的300项研究中,9项符合定性综合的纳入标准,8项纳入元分析。这些研究涉及406名患者和5393ms。治疗组术后疼痛、面部水肿(第1、3、7天)、咬牙(第3、7天)、麻醉起效时间、麻醉持续时间、麻醉注射时疼痛均有显著改善。总的来说,与单独使用麻醉剂相比,添加地塞米松显著提高了临床结果。然而,由于纳入试验的方法学限制,证据的确定性仍然很低。进一步高质量的随机对照试验,严格遵守标准化方案,对于减少偏倚和加强这些发现的可靠性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of dexamethasone-enhanced anaesthetics on postoperative pain, oedema, and trismus following third molar extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The extraction of third molars (3Ms) is frequently associated with postoperative inflammation and discomfort. This systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy of combining local anaesthetics with dexamethasone (treatment group) versus local anaesthetics alone (control group) in 3M surgeries. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Virtual Health Library, and Embase was conducted on June 9, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing outcomes such as pain, oedema, and trismus. Of 300 studies initially identified, nine met inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis, and eight were included in the meta-analyses. These studies involved 406 patients and 539 3Ms. The treatment group showed significant improvements in postoperative pain, facial oedema (days 1, 3, and 7), trismus (days 3 and 7), anaesthesia onset time, anaesthesia duration, and pain during anaesthetic injection. Overall, the addition of dexamethasone significantly enhanced clinical outcomes compared to anaesthetics alone. However, the certainty of the evidence remains low due to methodological limitations in the included trials. Further high-quality RCTs, rigorously adhering to standardized protocols, are essential to reduce bias and strengthen the reliability of these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信