头颈癌游离皮瓣重建术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案的结果。

IF 2.7
G Raj, M Raj, H H M Ng, Jimin Suh, N B Shannon, R H Nagadia, N G Iyer, R Dharmawan
{"title":"头颈癌游离皮瓣重建术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案的结果。","authors":"G Raj, M Raj, H H M Ng, Jimin Suh, N B Shannon, R H Nagadia, N G Iyer, R Dharmawan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijom.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol following head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery with free flap reconstruction. Primary outcomes measured were length of stay (LOS), days to oral feeds, days to ambulation, complications within 1 month, and 30-day readmission. Secondary outcomes included days to urinary catheter removal (TOC), use and duration of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), days to decannulation, and days to radiation therapy. Seventy-nine patients were studied: 37 ERAS and 42 pre-ERAS, with comparable baseline demographics. The ERAS group demonstrated significantly shorter median days to oral feeds (8.0 vs 11.0, P = 0.045) and TOC (5.0 vs 11.0, P = 0.007). Respiratory complications were also significantly lower in the ERAS group (0% vs 16.7%, P = 0.009). However, the ERAS group had longer median days to decannulation (8.0 vs 5.0, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in LOS, overall complication rate, or 30-day readmission. Adoption of the ERAS protocol in HNC free flap reconstruction is safe and effective, reducing time to oral feeding, respiratory complications, and days to TOC, though with longer decannulation times, without adversely affecting overall complications or readmissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94053,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol following head and neck cancer surgery with free flap reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"G Raj, M Raj, H H M Ng, Jimin Suh, N B Shannon, R H Nagadia, N G Iyer, R Dharmawan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijom.2025.08.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol following head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery with free flap reconstruction. Primary outcomes measured were length of stay (LOS), days to oral feeds, days to ambulation, complications within 1 month, and 30-day readmission. Secondary outcomes included days to urinary catheter removal (TOC), use and duration of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), days to decannulation, and days to radiation therapy. Seventy-nine patients were studied: 37 ERAS and 42 pre-ERAS, with comparable baseline demographics. The ERAS group demonstrated significantly shorter median days to oral feeds (8.0 vs 11.0, P = 0.045) and TOC (5.0 vs 11.0, P = 0.007). Respiratory complications were also significantly lower in the ERAS group (0% vs 16.7%, P = 0.009). However, the ERAS group had longer median days to decannulation (8.0 vs 5.0, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in LOS, overall complication rate, or 30-day readmission. Adoption of the ERAS protocol in HNC free flap reconstruction is safe and effective, reducing time to oral feeding, respiratory complications, and days to TOC, though with longer decannulation times, without adversely affecting overall complications or readmissions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2025.08.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2025.08.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估头颈癌(HNC)手术后自由皮瓣重建的术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案的有效性。测量的主要结果是住院时间(LOS)、口服喂养天数、活动天数、1个月内的并发症和30天的再入院。次要结局包括尿管拔除天数(TOC)、患者自控镇痛(PCA)的使用和持续时间、脱管天数和放射治疗天数。研究了79例患者:37例era和42例era前患者,具有可比的基线人口统计学特征。ERAS组到口服饲料的中位天数(8.0 vs 11.0, P = 0.045)和TOC (5.0 vs 11.0, P = 0.007)显著缩短。ERAS组呼吸系统并发症发生率明显低于对照组(0% vs 16.7%, P = 0.009)。然而,ERAS组去导管的中位天数更长(8.0 vs 5.0, P < 0.001)。在LOS、总并发症率或30天再入院率方面没有观察到显著差异。在HNC游离皮瓣重建中采用ERAS方案是安全有效的,减少了口服喂养时间、呼吸并发症和TOC天数,尽管脱管时间较长,但对总体并发症或再入院没有不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol following head and neck cancer surgery with free flap reconstruction.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol following head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery with free flap reconstruction. Primary outcomes measured were length of stay (LOS), days to oral feeds, days to ambulation, complications within 1 month, and 30-day readmission. Secondary outcomes included days to urinary catheter removal (TOC), use and duration of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), days to decannulation, and days to radiation therapy. Seventy-nine patients were studied: 37 ERAS and 42 pre-ERAS, with comparable baseline demographics. The ERAS group demonstrated significantly shorter median days to oral feeds (8.0 vs 11.0, P = 0.045) and TOC (5.0 vs 11.0, P = 0.007). Respiratory complications were also significantly lower in the ERAS group (0% vs 16.7%, P = 0.009). However, the ERAS group had longer median days to decannulation (8.0 vs 5.0, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in LOS, overall complication rate, or 30-day readmission. Adoption of the ERAS protocol in HNC free flap reconstruction is safe and effective, reducing time to oral feeding, respiratory complications, and days to TOC, though with longer decannulation times, without adversely affecting overall complications or readmissions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信