杀人罪犯动机量表(HOMS):基于定性系统回顾的杀人动机分类系统。

IF 1.8
John-Christopher A Finley, Nisha Sen-Gupta, Robert E Hanlon
{"title":"杀人罪犯动机量表(HOMS):基于定性系统回顾的杀人动机分类系统。","authors":"John-Christopher A Finley, Nisha Sen-Gupta, Robert E Hanlon","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.70170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many types of homicide motives have been described in the scientific literature. However, inconsistencies regarding how these motives are defined and classified may hinder the ability to understand the driving factors behind homicide. Developing a classification system that defines and organizes commonly used motives into superordinate categories may improve research focused on homicide. The current study sought to develop such a classification system, titled the Homicide Offender Motive Scale (HOMS), based on a qualitative systematic review. Databases including Medline, PsychINFO, and Google Scholar were reviewed to identify all homicide motive studies published prior to February 2024. Multiple reviewers independently assessed the quality of the studies using an empirical appraisal checklist. Seventy-seven studies comprising 143 motives with varying definitions were included. The reviewers then conducted a thematic analysis to identify descriptive and analytical themes for the 143 motives described in the studies. Following empirical guidelines, the motives were synthesized into 21 descriptive themes with operational definitions and criteria. Perfect interrater reliability of these definitions and criteria was then established in an independent sample of 200 adult homicide offenders. Finally, the 21 descriptive themes were grouped into four distinct analytical themes, which were also partly based on an existing criminological classification system. The 21 descriptive themes represent commonly observed motives across different homicide cases. The four analytical themes are superordinate categorizations of the specific motives. The empirical nature of the HOMS may offer a unified typology of homicide motive for researchers to expand upon.</p>","PeriodicalId":94080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Homicide Offender Motive Scale (HOMS): A classification system for homicide motives based on a qualitative systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"John-Christopher A Finley, Nisha Sen-Gupta, Robert E Hanlon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1556-4029.70170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many types of homicide motives have been described in the scientific literature. However, inconsistencies regarding how these motives are defined and classified may hinder the ability to understand the driving factors behind homicide. Developing a classification system that defines and organizes commonly used motives into superordinate categories may improve research focused on homicide. The current study sought to develop such a classification system, titled the Homicide Offender Motive Scale (HOMS), based on a qualitative systematic review. Databases including Medline, PsychINFO, and Google Scholar were reviewed to identify all homicide motive studies published prior to February 2024. Multiple reviewers independently assessed the quality of the studies using an empirical appraisal checklist. Seventy-seven studies comprising 143 motives with varying definitions were included. The reviewers then conducted a thematic analysis to identify descriptive and analytical themes for the 143 motives described in the studies. Following empirical guidelines, the motives were synthesized into 21 descriptive themes with operational definitions and criteria. Perfect interrater reliability of these definitions and criteria was then established in an independent sample of 200 adult homicide offenders. Finally, the 21 descriptive themes were grouped into four distinct analytical themes, which were also partly based on an existing criminological classification system. The 21 descriptive themes represent commonly observed motives across different homicide cases. The four analytical themes are superordinate categorizations of the specific motives. The empirical nature of the HOMS may offer a unified typology of homicide motive for researchers to expand upon.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of forensic sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of forensic sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科学文献中描述了许多类型的杀人动机。然而,关于这些动机如何定义和分类的不一致可能会阻碍理解杀人背后驱动因素的能力。开发一种分类系统,将常用的动机定义和组织成更高级的类别,可能会提高对杀人案的研究。目前的研究试图建立这样一个分类系统,标题为杀人罪犯动机量表(HOMS),基于定性的系统回顾。对Medline、PsychINFO和b谷歌Scholar等数据库进行了审查,以确定2024年2月之前发表的所有杀人动机研究。多名审稿人使用经验评估清单独立评估研究的质量。77项研究包括143种不同定义的动机。然后,审稿人进行了主题分析,以确定研究中描述的143个动机的描述性和分析性主题。根据经验指导方针,动机被合成为21个具有操作定义和标准的描述性主题。然后在200名成年杀人罪犯的独立样本中建立了这些定义和标准的完美互译可靠性。最后,将21个描述性主题分为四个不同的分析主题,这些主题也部分基于现有的犯罪学分类系统。21个描述性主题代表了不同凶杀案中常见的动机。这四个分析主题是对具体动机的高级分类。HOMS的经验性质可能为研究人员提供一个统一的杀人动机类型学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Homicide Offender Motive Scale (HOMS): A classification system for homicide motives based on a qualitative systematic review.

Many types of homicide motives have been described in the scientific literature. However, inconsistencies regarding how these motives are defined and classified may hinder the ability to understand the driving factors behind homicide. Developing a classification system that defines and organizes commonly used motives into superordinate categories may improve research focused on homicide. The current study sought to develop such a classification system, titled the Homicide Offender Motive Scale (HOMS), based on a qualitative systematic review. Databases including Medline, PsychINFO, and Google Scholar were reviewed to identify all homicide motive studies published prior to February 2024. Multiple reviewers independently assessed the quality of the studies using an empirical appraisal checklist. Seventy-seven studies comprising 143 motives with varying definitions were included. The reviewers then conducted a thematic analysis to identify descriptive and analytical themes for the 143 motives described in the studies. Following empirical guidelines, the motives were synthesized into 21 descriptive themes with operational definitions and criteria. Perfect interrater reliability of these definitions and criteria was then established in an independent sample of 200 adult homicide offenders. Finally, the 21 descriptive themes were grouped into four distinct analytical themes, which were also partly based on an existing criminological classification system. The 21 descriptive themes represent commonly observed motives across different homicide cases. The four analytical themes are superordinate categorizations of the specific motives. The empirical nature of the HOMS may offer a unified typology of homicide motive for researchers to expand upon.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信