抗焦虑治疗的未来方向:新靶点和策略的综合综述。

IF 1.7
Mahima, Avijit Mazumder, Bhavani Pentela
{"title":"抗焦虑治疗的未来方向:新靶点和策略的综合综述。","authors":"Mahima, Avijit Mazumder, Bhavani Pentela","doi":"10.2174/0115672026394052250808075022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With 301 million cases worldwide, anxiety disorders represent a serious public health concern. Many people endure ongoing distress while receiving several treatments because of the drawbacks of traditional therapy, such as adverse effects, dependence, and inconsistent efficacy. This emphasizes the absolute need for novel treatment approaches.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review examines emerging pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for anxiety disorders, assessing existing and developing therapeutic options while examining the drawbacks of conventional therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature review was carried out using the NIH, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases. Studies from 2020-2025 were given priority in the inclusion criteria, with a few supporting references from earlier years. Personalized medicine, combination therapy, non-pharmacological interventions, and novel anxiolytic targets, etc., were among the keywords used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conventional therapies, including benzodiazepines, SSRIs, and SNRIs, are still the major choices, but they have significant disadvantages. The protein kinase pathway, endocannabinoid and orexin systems, NK1R antagonists, and microbiome modulation are examples of emerging targets. Emerging strategies that show preliminary promise include digital therapeutics, gene therapy, optogenetics, personalized medicine, combination therapy, herbal therapy, and peptide-based medicines (e.g., NPY, NPS, oxytocin analogs, CRF, vasopressin, and melanocortin receptor antagonist). Several of these approaches modulate key neural circuits, such as the involvement of the amygdala-prefrontal cortex axis, via the HPA axis, and biomarker-informed personalization, among others; yet many remain in early-phase or preclinical investigation. However, limited comparative data exist between these novel strategies and standard therapies, underlining the need for rigorous head-to-head evaluations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advances in molecular neuroscience and precision medicine offer potential alternatives to conventional treatments. However, most emerging therapies require further clinical validation, large-scale trials, and translational refinement before they can be integrated into realworld decision-making for anxiety disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":93965,"journal":{"name":"Current neurovascular research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Future Directions in Anxiolytic Therapy: A Comprehensive Review of Novel Targets and Strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Mahima, Avijit Mazumder, Bhavani Pentela\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115672026394052250808075022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With 301 million cases worldwide, anxiety disorders represent a serious public health concern. Many people endure ongoing distress while receiving several treatments because of the drawbacks of traditional therapy, such as adverse effects, dependence, and inconsistent efficacy. This emphasizes the absolute need for novel treatment approaches.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review examines emerging pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for anxiety disorders, assessing existing and developing therapeutic options while examining the drawbacks of conventional therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature review was carried out using the NIH, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases. Studies from 2020-2025 were given priority in the inclusion criteria, with a few supporting references from earlier years. Personalized medicine, combination therapy, non-pharmacological interventions, and novel anxiolytic targets, etc., were among the keywords used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conventional therapies, including benzodiazepines, SSRIs, and SNRIs, are still the major choices, but they have significant disadvantages. The protein kinase pathway, endocannabinoid and orexin systems, NK1R antagonists, and microbiome modulation are examples of emerging targets. Emerging strategies that show preliminary promise include digital therapeutics, gene therapy, optogenetics, personalized medicine, combination therapy, herbal therapy, and peptide-based medicines (e.g., NPY, NPS, oxytocin analogs, CRF, vasopressin, and melanocortin receptor antagonist). Several of these approaches modulate key neural circuits, such as the involvement of the amygdala-prefrontal cortex axis, via the HPA axis, and biomarker-informed personalization, among others; yet many remain in early-phase or preclinical investigation. However, limited comparative data exist between these novel strategies and standard therapies, underlining the need for rigorous head-to-head evaluations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advances in molecular neuroscience and precision medicine offer potential alternatives to conventional treatments. However, most emerging therapies require further clinical validation, large-scale trials, and translational refinement before they can be integrated into realworld decision-making for anxiety disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current neurovascular research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current neurovascular research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672026394052250808075022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current neurovascular research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672026394052250808075022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全世界有3.01亿例焦虑症,是一个严重的公共卫生问题。许多人在接受多种治疗的同时忍受着持续的痛苦,因为传统疗法的缺点,如副作用、依赖性和疗效不一致。这强调了对新治疗方法的绝对需要。目的:本综述探讨了新兴的药物和非药物治疗焦虑症的策略,评估了现有的和正在开发的治疗方案,同时检查了传统疗法的缺点。方法:使用NIH、PubMed和谷歌Scholar数据库进行全面的文献综述。2020-2025年的研究在纳入标准中被优先考虑,还有一些早期的支持性参考文献。关键词包括个性化医疗、联合治疗、非药物干预、新型抗焦虑靶点等。结果:苯二氮卓类药物、SSRIs类药物和SNRIs类药物仍是主要选择,但存在明显的不足。蛋白激酶途径、内源性大麻素和食欲素系统、NK1R拮抗剂和微生物组调节是新兴靶点的例子。显示出初步前景的新兴策略包括数字疗法、基因疗法、光遗传学、个性化药物、联合疗法、草药疗法和基于肽的药物(如NPY、NPS、催产素类似物、CRF、加压素和黑素皮质素受体拮抗剂)。其中几种方法调节关键的神经回路,例如通过HPA轴参与杏仁核-前额叶皮层轴,以及生物标记信息个性化等;然而,许多仍处于早期或临床前研究阶段。然而,这些新策略和标准疗法之间的比较数据有限,强调了严格的正面评估的必要性。结论:分子神经科学和精准医学的进步为传统治疗提供了潜在的替代方案。然而,大多数新兴疗法需要进一步的临床验证、大规模试验和转化改进,才能整合到现实世界的焦虑症决策中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Future Directions in Anxiolytic Therapy: A Comprehensive Review of Novel Targets and Strategies.

Background: With 301 million cases worldwide, anxiety disorders represent a serious public health concern. Many people endure ongoing distress while receiving several treatments because of the drawbacks of traditional therapy, such as adverse effects, dependence, and inconsistent efficacy. This emphasizes the absolute need for novel treatment approaches.

Objective: This review examines emerging pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for anxiety disorders, assessing existing and developing therapeutic options while examining the drawbacks of conventional therapies.

Methods: A comprehensive literature review was carried out using the NIH, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases. Studies from 2020-2025 were given priority in the inclusion criteria, with a few supporting references from earlier years. Personalized medicine, combination therapy, non-pharmacological interventions, and novel anxiolytic targets, etc., were among the keywords used.

Results: Conventional therapies, including benzodiazepines, SSRIs, and SNRIs, are still the major choices, but they have significant disadvantages. The protein kinase pathway, endocannabinoid and orexin systems, NK1R antagonists, and microbiome modulation are examples of emerging targets. Emerging strategies that show preliminary promise include digital therapeutics, gene therapy, optogenetics, personalized medicine, combination therapy, herbal therapy, and peptide-based medicines (e.g., NPY, NPS, oxytocin analogs, CRF, vasopressin, and melanocortin receptor antagonist). Several of these approaches modulate key neural circuits, such as the involvement of the amygdala-prefrontal cortex axis, via the HPA axis, and biomarker-informed personalization, among others; yet many remain in early-phase or preclinical investigation. However, limited comparative data exist between these novel strategies and standard therapies, underlining the need for rigorous head-to-head evaluations.

Conclusion: Advances in molecular neuroscience and precision medicine offer potential alternatives to conventional treatments. However, most emerging therapies require further clinical validation, large-scale trials, and translational refinement before they can be integrated into realworld decision-making for anxiety disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信