Adrian Militaru, Catalin Andrei Bulai, Razvan Dragos Multescu, Cosmin Victor Ene, Mihai Andrei Ene, Cristian Mares, Stefan Balacescu, Dragos Adrian Georgescu, Petrisor Aurelian Geavlete, Bogdan Florin Geavlete
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间肾结石管理中断:一项回顾性单中心研究","authors":"Adrian Militaru, Catalin Andrei Bulai, Razvan Dragos Multescu, Cosmin Victor Ene, Mihai Andrei Ene, Cristian Mares, Stefan Balacescu, Dragos Adrian Georgescu, Petrisor Aurelian Geavlete, Bogdan Florin Geavlete","doi":"10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated changes in renal stone management during the COVID-19 pandemic in a single center, focusing on treatment methods, patient outcomes and healthcare delivery models.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing patients treated for kidney stones between July-September 2019 (pre-pandemic period) and July-September 2020 (pandemic period). We assessed the number of treated patients, treatment modalities and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 77 inpatients were analyzed, of whom 50 had been admitted to hospital during the pre-pandemic period and 27 during the pandemic, which represented a 46% decrease in hospitalizations. There were no significant differences in body mass index, average age, stone laterality, size, or location. Serum creatinine levels and positive urine cultures were also comparable between the groups. A trend toward more minimally invasive procedures was observed during the pandemic, with an increased use of flexible ureteroscopy (62% vs . 70.4%) and a decrease in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (12% vs . 7.4%). Operative times and hospital stays were similar across groups. However, the stone-free rate significantly decreased during the pandemic (91.1% vs . 84.07%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted renal stone management, leading to a preference for minimally invasive surgery but a lower stone-free rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":74094,"journal":{"name":"Maedica","volume":"20 2","pages":"243-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12347054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disruptions in Renal Stone Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Retrospective Single-Center Study.\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Militaru, Catalin Andrei Bulai, Razvan Dragos Multescu, Cosmin Victor Ene, Mihai Andrei Ene, Cristian Mares, Stefan Balacescu, Dragos Adrian Georgescu, Petrisor Aurelian Geavlete, Bogdan Florin Geavlete\",\"doi\":\"10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated changes in renal stone management during the COVID-19 pandemic in a single center, focusing on treatment methods, patient outcomes and healthcare delivery models.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing patients treated for kidney stones between July-September 2019 (pre-pandemic period) and July-September 2020 (pandemic period). We assessed the number of treated patients, treatment modalities and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 77 inpatients were analyzed, of whom 50 had been admitted to hospital during the pre-pandemic period and 27 during the pandemic, which represented a 46% decrease in hospitalizations. There were no significant differences in body mass index, average age, stone laterality, size, or location. Serum creatinine levels and positive urine cultures were also comparable between the groups. A trend toward more minimally invasive procedures was observed during the pandemic, with an increased use of flexible ureteroscopy (62% vs . 70.4%) and a decrease in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (12% vs . 7.4%). Operative times and hospital stays were similar across groups. However, the stone-free rate significantly decreased during the pandemic (91.1% vs . 84.07%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted renal stone management, leading to a preference for minimally invasive surgery but a lower stone-free rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maedica\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"243-249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12347054/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maedica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究在单一中心评估了COVID-19大流行期间肾结石管理的变化,重点关注治疗方法、患者结局和医疗保健服务模式。材料和方法:我们对2019年7月至9月(大流行前)和2020年7月至9月(大流行期间)接受肾结石治疗的患者进行了回顾性分析。我们评估了治疗患者的数量、治疗方式和术后结果。结果:共分析了77名住院患者,其中50人在大流行前住院,27人在大流行期间住院,住院率下降了46%。两组在体重指数、平均年龄、结石偏侧、大小或位置方面无显著差异。血清肌酐水平和阳性尿培养在两组之间也具有可比性。在大流行期间,观察到微创手术的趋势,输尿管软镜的使用增加(62%对62%)。70.4%)和经皮肾镜取石术的减少(12% vs。7.4%)。各组手术时间和住院时间相似。然而,在大流行期间,无结石率显著下降(91.1% vs . 91.1%)。84.07%)。结论:2019冠状病毒病大流行显著破坏了肾结石的治疗,导致首选微创手术,但肾结石无结石率较低。
Disruptions in Renal Stone Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Retrospective Single-Center Study.
Objectives: This study evaluated changes in renal stone management during the COVID-19 pandemic in a single center, focusing on treatment methods, patient outcomes and healthcare delivery models.
Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing patients treated for kidney stones between July-September 2019 (pre-pandemic period) and July-September 2020 (pandemic period). We assessed the number of treated patients, treatment modalities and postoperative outcomes.
Results: A total of 77 inpatients were analyzed, of whom 50 had been admitted to hospital during the pre-pandemic period and 27 during the pandemic, which represented a 46% decrease in hospitalizations. There were no significant differences in body mass index, average age, stone laterality, size, or location. Serum creatinine levels and positive urine cultures were also comparable between the groups. A trend toward more minimally invasive procedures was observed during the pandemic, with an increased use of flexible ureteroscopy (62% vs . 70.4%) and a decrease in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (12% vs . 7.4%). Operative times and hospital stays were similar across groups. However, the stone-free rate significantly decreased during the pandemic (91.1% vs . 84.07%).
Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted renal stone management, leading to a preference for minimally invasive surgery but a lower stone-free rate.