正常体重、超重和肥胖成人自主神经指数的比较——使用东南亚肥胖分类标准的比较分析

Jagdish Prasad Seoran, Shival Srivastav, Prasunpriya Nayak
{"title":"正常体重、超重和肥胖成人自主神经指数的比较——使用东南亚肥胖分类标准的比较分析","authors":"Jagdish Prasad Seoran, Shival Srivastav, Prasunpriya Nayak","doi":"10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Autonomic function assessment, performed using heart rate variability and Ewing's battery, can help unravel autonomic neuropathy in many clinical disorders. This assessment can be affected by obesity. We revisited the relationship between autonomic function parameters and obesity. The body mass index (BMI) based stratification based on standard World Health Organization (WHO) classification and revised South East Asian (SEA) classification was employed.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Apparently, healthy subjects of either sex were included in the present study. Subjects were classified into normal weight (NOR), overweight (OW) and obese (OB) categories using both guidelines. An autonomic function test was performed, documenting heart rate variability (HRV) and Ewing's battery of tests including postural challenge, deep breathing, cold pressor and isometric exercise. Parameters were compared between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 105 healthy subjects (89 males, 16 females) with a mean age of 29.83 ± 5.44 years. There were 33, 29 and 43 subjects in the NOR, OW and OB categories, respectively, as per the revised SEA classification. Similarly, 63 subjects were NOR, 42 OW, and six OB, as per the WHO criteria. There was no significant difference between HRV parameters and autonomic reactivity parameters between NOR, OW and OB subjects as per the revised SEA and WHO criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WHO criteria underestimated obesity in our population sample. In addition, there was no significant difference in autonomic parameters between NW, OW and OB subjects as per the SEA criteria. We propose that the effect of obesity on autonomic parameters may require a revisit in light of revised BMI criteria for the SEA population.</p>","PeriodicalId":74094,"journal":{"name":"Maedica","volume":"20 2","pages":"200-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12347005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Autonomic Indices in Normal Weight, Overweight and Obese Adults - a Comparative Analysis Using South East Asian Criteria for Obesity Classification.\",\"authors\":\"Jagdish Prasad Seoran, Shival Srivastav, Prasunpriya Nayak\",\"doi\":\"10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Autonomic function assessment, performed using heart rate variability and Ewing's battery, can help unravel autonomic neuropathy in many clinical disorders. This assessment can be affected by obesity. We revisited the relationship between autonomic function parameters and obesity. The body mass index (BMI) based stratification based on standard World Health Organization (WHO) classification and revised South East Asian (SEA) classification was employed.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Apparently, healthy subjects of either sex were included in the present study. Subjects were classified into normal weight (NOR), overweight (OW) and obese (OB) categories using both guidelines. An autonomic function test was performed, documenting heart rate variability (HRV) and Ewing's battery of tests including postural challenge, deep breathing, cold pressor and isometric exercise. Parameters were compared between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 105 healthy subjects (89 males, 16 females) with a mean age of 29.83 ± 5.44 years. There were 33, 29 and 43 subjects in the NOR, OW and OB categories, respectively, as per the revised SEA classification. Similarly, 63 subjects were NOR, 42 OW, and six OB, as per the WHO criteria. There was no significant difference between HRV parameters and autonomic reactivity parameters between NOR, OW and OB subjects as per the revised SEA and WHO criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WHO criteria underestimated obesity in our population sample. In addition, there was no significant difference in autonomic parameters between NW, OW and OB subjects as per the SEA criteria. We propose that the effect of obesity on autonomic parameters may require a revisit in light of revised BMI criteria for the SEA population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maedica\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"200-208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12347005/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maedica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自主神经功能评估,使用心率变异性和尤因电池,可以帮助解开许多临床疾病的自主神经病变。这种评估可能会受到肥胖的影响。我们重新审视了自主神经功能参数与肥胖之间的关系。采用基于世界卫生组织(WHO)标准分类和修订的东南亚(SEA)分类的体重指数(BMI)分层。材料与方法:显然,本研究纳入了健康的男女受试者。使用两种指南将受试者分为正常体重(NOR)、超重(OW)和肥胖(OB)三类。进行自主神经功能测试,记录心率变异性(HRV)和Ewing的一系列测试,包括姿势挑战、深呼吸、冷压和等长运动。比较三组间的各项参数。结果:纳入健康受试者105例(男89例,女16例),平均年龄29.83±5.44岁。根据修订后的SEA分类,NOR、OW和OB类别分别有33、29和43名受试者。同样,根据WHO标准,63名受试者为NOR, 42名为OW, 6名为OB。根据修订后的SEA和WHO标准,NOR、OW和OB受试者之间的HRV参数和自主反应性参数无显著差异。结论:世卫组织的标准低估了我们人群样本中的肥胖。此外,根据SEA标准,NW、OW和OB受试者的自主神经参数无显著差异。我们建议,肥胖对自主神经参数的影响可能需要根据修订后的SEA人群BMI标准重新审视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Autonomic Indices in Normal Weight, Overweight and Obese Adults - a Comparative Analysis Using South East Asian Criteria for Obesity Classification.

Objectives: Autonomic function assessment, performed using heart rate variability and Ewing's battery, can help unravel autonomic neuropathy in many clinical disorders. This assessment can be affected by obesity. We revisited the relationship between autonomic function parameters and obesity. The body mass index (BMI) based stratification based on standard World Health Organization (WHO) classification and revised South East Asian (SEA) classification was employed.

Materials and methods: Apparently, healthy subjects of either sex were included in the present study. Subjects were classified into normal weight (NOR), overweight (OW) and obese (OB) categories using both guidelines. An autonomic function test was performed, documenting heart rate variability (HRV) and Ewing's battery of tests including postural challenge, deep breathing, cold pressor and isometric exercise. Parameters were compared between the three groups.

Results: We recruited 105 healthy subjects (89 males, 16 females) with a mean age of 29.83 ± 5.44 years. There were 33, 29 and 43 subjects in the NOR, OW and OB categories, respectively, as per the revised SEA classification. Similarly, 63 subjects were NOR, 42 OW, and six OB, as per the WHO criteria. There was no significant difference between HRV parameters and autonomic reactivity parameters between NOR, OW and OB subjects as per the revised SEA and WHO criteria.

Conclusions: The WHO criteria underestimated obesity in our population sample. In addition, there was no significant difference in autonomic parameters between NW, OW and OB subjects as per the SEA criteria. We propose that the effect of obesity on autonomic parameters may require a revisit in light of revised BMI criteria for the SEA population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信