多发性硬化症(MS)患者步态不平衡的机器人康复:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Sahar Ghorbanpour, Mohsen Astkar, Setareh Rohani, Mahsa Ghajarzadeh
{"title":"多发性硬化症(MS)患者步态不平衡的机器人康复:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Sahar Ghorbanpour, Mohsen Astkar, Setareh Rohani, Mahsa Ghajarzadeh","doi":"10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective: To estimate the pooled effect of robotic rehabilitation on gait in subjects with multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, IEEE and Web of Science databases on October 1 st 2022, without any time or language limitation. Also, we investigated the grey literature, including conference abstract and references of references, to identify potentially relevant articles. The primary outcomes were the six-minute walking test (6MWT) and Timed Up and Go (TUG). The risk of bias in the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane's risk of bias tool for non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2). Meta-analyses were performed using a fixed-effects model as the heterogeneity between study results (I2) was less than 50%. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated as the effect size for study outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our systematic search retrieved 6878 studies and, after deleting duplicate results, 5019 articles remained. Two researchers screened the titles and abstracts, with 4942 studies remaining for further screening. After full-text assessment, 12 studies were included for meta-analysis, most of which were conducted in the USA and Italy and were published between 2007 and 2022. The mean age of participants in the selected studies ranged between 46-55 years and the mean expanded disability status scale (EDSS) between 5 and 6.5. The SMD of 6MWT (AFTER-BEFORE) was 0.22 (95% CI -0.01-0.45) (I 2 =0%, P=0.90). The SMD of TUG (AFTER-BEFORE) was -0.29 (95% CI -0.56, -0.02) (I 2 =0%, P=0.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that robotic rehabilitation was effective for gait rehabilitation in patients with MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":74094,"journal":{"name":"Maedica","volume":"20 2","pages":"334-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12347010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic Rehabilitation for Gait Imbalance in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS): a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sahar Ghorbanpour, Mohsen Astkar, Setareh Rohani, Mahsa Ghajarzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective: To estimate the pooled effect of robotic rehabilitation on gait in subjects with multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, IEEE and Web of Science databases on October 1 st 2022, without any time or language limitation. Also, we investigated the grey literature, including conference abstract and references of references, to identify potentially relevant articles. The primary outcomes were the six-minute walking test (6MWT) and Timed Up and Go (TUG). The risk of bias in the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane's risk of bias tool for non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2). Meta-analyses were performed using a fixed-effects model as the heterogeneity between study results (I2) was less than 50%. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated as the effect size for study outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our systematic search retrieved 6878 studies and, after deleting duplicate results, 5019 articles remained. Two researchers screened the titles and abstracts, with 4942 studies remaining for further screening. After full-text assessment, 12 studies were included for meta-analysis, most of which were conducted in the USA and Italy and were published between 2007 and 2022. The mean age of participants in the selected studies ranged between 46-55 years and the mean expanded disability status scale (EDSS) between 5 and 6.5. The SMD of 6MWT (AFTER-BEFORE) was 0.22 (95% CI -0.01-0.45) (I 2 =0%, P=0.90). The SMD of TUG (AFTER-BEFORE) was -0.29 (95% CI -0.56, -0.02) (I 2 =0%, P=0.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that robotic rehabilitation was effective for gait rehabilitation in patients with MS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maedica\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"334-341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12347010/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maedica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估机器人康复对多发性硬化症(MS)患者步态的综合影响。方法:于2022年10月1日系统检索PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE、IEEE、Web of Science等数据库,不受时间和语言限制。此外,我们调查了灰色文献,包括会议摘要和参考文献,以确定潜在的相关文章。主要结果为6分钟步行测试(6MWT)和计时行走测试(TUG)。采用Cochrane非随机研究的偏倚风险工具(ROBINS-I)和随机试验的Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB2)评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。由于研究结果(I2)的异质性小于50%,采用固定效应模型进行meta分析。计算标准化平均差(SMD)作为研究结果的效应量。结果:我们的系统检索检索到6878篇研究,在删除重复的结果后,还剩下5019篇。两名研究人员筛选了标题和摘要,还有4942项研究有待进一步筛选。在全文评估后,纳入了12项研究进行荟萃分析,其中大多数研究在美国和意大利进行,发表于2007年至2022年之间。所选研究参与者的平均年龄在46-55岁之间,平均扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)在5 - 6.5岁之间。6MWT组(AFTER-BEFORE)的SMD为0.22 (95% CI -0.01-0.45) (i2 =0%, P=0.90)。TUG (AFTER-BEFORE)的SMD为-0.29 (95% CI为-0.56,-0.02)(I 2 =0%, P=0.70)。结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析得出结论,机器人康复对MS患者的步态康复是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robotic Rehabilitation for Gait Imbalance in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS): a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: To estimate the pooled effect of robotic rehabilitation on gait in subjects with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, IEEE and Web of Science databases on October 1 st 2022, without any time or language limitation. Also, we investigated the grey literature, including conference abstract and references of references, to identify potentially relevant articles. The primary outcomes were the six-minute walking test (6MWT) and Timed Up and Go (TUG). The risk of bias in the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane's risk of bias tool for non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2). Meta-analyses were performed using a fixed-effects model as the heterogeneity between study results (I2) was less than 50%. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated as the effect size for study outcomes.

Results: Our systematic search retrieved 6878 studies and, after deleting duplicate results, 5019 articles remained. Two researchers screened the titles and abstracts, with 4942 studies remaining for further screening. After full-text assessment, 12 studies were included for meta-analysis, most of which were conducted in the USA and Italy and were published between 2007 and 2022. The mean age of participants in the selected studies ranged between 46-55 years and the mean expanded disability status scale (EDSS) between 5 and 6.5. The SMD of 6MWT (AFTER-BEFORE) was 0.22 (95% CI -0.01-0.45) (I 2 =0%, P=0.90). The SMD of TUG (AFTER-BEFORE) was -0.29 (95% CI -0.56, -0.02) (I 2 =0%, P=0.70).

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that robotic rehabilitation was effective for gait rehabilitation in patients with MS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信