在急诊科分诊时实施发热性中性粒细胞减少方案的评价

Stefanie Stramel-Stafford, Heather Townsend, Brian Trimmer, James Cohen, Jessica Thompson
{"title":"在急诊科分诊时实施发热性中性粒细胞减少方案的评价","authors":"Stefanie Stramel-Stafford, Heather Townsend, Brian Trimmer, James Cohen, Jessica Thompson","doi":"10.3390/medicines12030020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The impact of a febrile neutropenia (FN) emergency department (ED) triage screening tool and protocol on time to antibiotic administration (TTA) and patient outcomes was evaluated. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective, quasi-experimental study of adult FN patients admitted through the ED from April 2014 to April 2017. In March 2016 a triage screening tool and protocol were implemented. In patients who screened positive, nursing initiated a protocol that included laboratory diagnostics and a pharmacy consult for empiric antibiotics prior to evaluation by a provider. Patients were evaluated pre- and post-protocol for TTA, 30-day mortality, ED length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. <b>Results:</b> A total of 130 patients were included in the study, 77 pre-protocol and 53 post-protocol. Median TTA was longer in the pre-protocol group at 174 min (interquartile range [IQR] 105-224) vs. 109 min (IQR 71-214) post-protocol, <i>p</i> = 0.04. Thirty-day mortality was greater at 18.8% pre-protocol vs. 7.5% post-protocol, <i>p</i> = 0.12. There was no difference in hospital LOS. Pre-protocol patients compared to post-protocol patients who had a pharmacy consult demonstrated a further reduction in TTA (174 min [IQR 105-224] vs. 87.5 min [IQR 61.5-135], <i>p</i> < 0.01) and a reduced mortality (18% vs. 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.04). <b>Conclusions:</b> To our knowledge, this is the first report of a protocol for febrile neutropenia that allows pharmacists to order antibiotics based on a nurse triage assessment. Evaluation of the protocol demonstrated a significant reduction in TTA and trend toward improved mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":74162,"journal":{"name":"Medicines (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a Febrile Neutropenia Protocol Implemented at Triage in an Emergency Department.\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie Stramel-Stafford, Heather Townsend, Brian Trimmer, James Cohen, Jessica Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medicines12030020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The impact of a febrile neutropenia (FN) emergency department (ED) triage screening tool and protocol on time to antibiotic administration (TTA) and patient outcomes was evaluated. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective, quasi-experimental study of adult FN patients admitted through the ED from April 2014 to April 2017. In March 2016 a triage screening tool and protocol were implemented. In patients who screened positive, nursing initiated a protocol that included laboratory diagnostics and a pharmacy consult for empiric antibiotics prior to evaluation by a provider. Patients were evaluated pre- and post-protocol for TTA, 30-day mortality, ED length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. <b>Results:</b> A total of 130 patients were included in the study, 77 pre-protocol and 53 post-protocol. Median TTA was longer in the pre-protocol group at 174 min (interquartile range [IQR] 105-224) vs. 109 min (IQR 71-214) post-protocol, <i>p</i> = 0.04. Thirty-day mortality was greater at 18.8% pre-protocol vs. 7.5% post-protocol, <i>p</i> = 0.12. There was no difference in hospital LOS. Pre-protocol patients compared to post-protocol patients who had a pharmacy consult demonstrated a further reduction in TTA (174 min [IQR 105-224] vs. 87.5 min [IQR 61.5-135], <i>p</i> < 0.01) and a reduced mortality (18% vs. 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.04). <b>Conclusions:</b> To our knowledge, this is the first report of a protocol for febrile neutropenia that allows pharmacists to order antibiotics based on a nurse triage assessment. Evaluation of the protocol demonstrated a significant reduction in TTA and trend toward improved mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicines (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372115/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicines (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines12030020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicines (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines12030020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)急诊科(ED)分诊筛查工具和方案对抗生素按时给药(TTA)和患者预后的影响。方法:对2014年4月至2017年4月在急诊科就诊的成年FN患者进行回顾性、准实验研究。2016年3月,实施了分诊筛查工具和方案。在筛查呈阳性的患者中,护理部门启动了一项协议,其中包括实验室诊断和由提供者评估之前的经验性抗生素药房咨询。评估患者治疗前后的TTA、30天死亡率、急诊科住院时间(LOS)和住院时间(LOS)。结果:共纳入130例患者,方案前77例,方案后53例。方案前组的中位时间间隔更长,为174分钟(四分位间距[IQR] 105-224),方案后为109分钟(IQR 71-214), p = 0.04。方案前30天死亡率为18.8%,方案后为7.5%,p = 0.12。医院LOS无差异。方案前患者与方案后接受药房咨询的患者相比,TTA进一步降低(174分钟[IQR 105-224]对87.5分钟[IQR 61.5-135], p < 0.01),死亡率降低(18%对0%,p = 0.04)。结论:据我们所知,这是第一份关于发热性中性粒细胞减少症方案的报告,该方案允许药剂师根据护士分诊评估来订购抗生素。对该方案的评估显示TTA显著降低,并有改善死亡率的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of a Febrile Neutropenia Protocol Implemented at Triage in an Emergency Department.

Evaluation of a Febrile Neutropenia Protocol Implemented at Triage in an Emergency Department.

Evaluation of a Febrile Neutropenia Protocol Implemented at Triage in an Emergency Department.

Evaluation of a Febrile Neutropenia Protocol Implemented at Triage in an Emergency Department.

Objective: The impact of a febrile neutropenia (FN) emergency department (ED) triage screening tool and protocol on time to antibiotic administration (TTA) and patient outcomes was evaluated. Methods: This was a retrospective, quasi-experimental study of adult FN patients admitted through the ED from April 2014 to April 2017. In March 2016 a triage screening tool and protocol were implemented. In patients who screened positive, nursing initiated a protocol that included laboratory diagnostics and a pharmacy consult for empiric antibiotics prior to evaluation by a provider. Patients were evaluated pre- and post-protocol for TTA, 30-day mortality, ED length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. Results: A total of 130 patients were included in the study, 77 pre-protocol and 53 post-protocol. Median TTA was longer in the pre-protocol group at 174 min (interquartile range [IQR] 105-224) vs. 109 min (IQR 71-214) post-protocol, p = 0.04. Thirty-day mortality was greater at 18.8% pre-protocol vs. 7.5% post-protocol, p = 0.12. There was no difference in hospital LOS. Pre-protocol patients compared to post-protocol patients who had a pharmacy consult demonstrated a further reduction in TTA (174 min [IQR 105-224] vs. 87.5 min [IQR 61.5-135], p < 0.01) and a reduced mortality (18% vs. 0%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first report of a protocol for febrile neutropenia that allows pharmacists to order antibiotics based on a nurse triage assessment. Evaluation of the protocol demonstrated a significant reduction in TTA and trend toward improved mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信