当代研究团体的价值论和动力学:知识、价值和社会要素的系统回顾和解释学元分析。

IF 1.6
Frontiers in research metrics and analytics Pub Date : 2025-08-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frma.2025.1525587
Edgar O Ayala, Myriam M Altamirano-Bustamante, Adalberto de Hoyos-Bermea
{"title":"当代研究团体的价值论和动力学:知识、价值和社会要素的系统回顾和解释学元分析。","authors":"Edgar O Ayala, Myriam M Altamirano-Bustamante, Adalberto de Hoyos-Bermea","doi":"10.3389/frma.2025.1525587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This research explores the practices of current research groups, where multidisciplinary groups stand out for their relevance in developing science. The objective is to comprehensively explore the practices and values of research groups through a three phase study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the first phase a systematic review was performed, in the second phase, a hermeneutic analysis focused on values, knowledge and the social elements to describe and delve into the development of scientific practices. The third phase, a discussion of these practices and interactions was proposed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most relevant findings are the specific attitudes valued in social interactions, such as the relationship between cooperation and solidarity, economic values like the link between benefit and profitability, and research values like the connection between inclusion and coherence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These relationships help define the value networks that shape interactions, practices and relationships within scientific groups. This describes the dynamic of contemporary science to answer today's challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":73104,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","volume":"10 ","pages":"1525587"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Axiology and dynamics of contemporary research groups: a systematic review and hermeneutic meta-analysis of knowledge, values, and social elements.\",\"authors\":\"Edgar O Ayala, Myriam M Altamirano-Bustamante, Adalberto de Hoyos-Bermea\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frma.2025.1525587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This research explores the practices of current research groups, where multidisciplinary groups stand out for their relevance in developing science. The objective is to comprehensively explore the practices and values of research groups through a three phase study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the first phase a systematic review was performed, in the second phase, a hermeneutic analysis focused on values, knowledge and the social elements to describe and delve into the development of scientific practices. The third phase, a discussion of these practices and interactions was proposed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most relevant findings are the specific attitudes valued in social interactions, such as the relationship between cooperation and solidarity, economic values like the link between benefit and profitability, and research values like the connection between inclusion and coherence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These relationships help define the value networks that shape interactions, practices and relationships within scientific groups. This describes the dynamic of contemporary science to answer today's challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"1525587\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369186/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1525587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1525587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:本研究探讨了当前研究小组的实践,其中多学科小组因其与发展科学的相关性而脱颖而出。目的是通过三个阶段的研究,全面探索研究小组的实践和价值。方法:在第一阶段进行了系统的回顾,在第二阶段,对价值观、知识和社会因素进行了解释学分析,以描述和深入研究科学实践的发展。第三阶段,提出了对这些实践和相互作用的讨论。结果:最相关的发现是在社会互动中重视的具体态度,如合作与团结的关系,经济价值,如利益与盈利能力之间的联系,以及研究价值,如包容与连贯之间的联系。讨论:这些关系有助于定义科学团体内部形成互动、实践和关系的价值网络。这描述了当代科学应对当今挑战的动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Axiology and dynamics of contemporary research groups: a systematic review and hermeneutic meta-analysis of knowledge, values, and social elements.

Introduction: This research explores the practices of current research groups, where multidisciplinary groups stand out for their relevance in developing science. The objective is to comprehensively explore the practices and values of research groups through a three phase study.

Methods: In the first phase a systematic review was performed, in the second phase, a hermeneutic analysis focused on values, knowledge and the social elements to describe and delve into the development of scientific practices. The third phase, a discussion of these practices and interactions was proposed.

Results: The most relevant findings are the specific attitudes valued in social interactions, such as the relationship between cooperation and solidarity, economic values like the link between benefit and profitability, and research values like the connection between inclusion and coherence.

Discussion: These relationships help define the value networks that shape interactions, practices and relationships within scientific groups. This describes the dynamic of contemporary science to answer today's challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信