开发和评估爱尔兰全科实践中处方质量和安全仪表板的可用性:定性研究的协议。

HRB open research Pub Date : 2025-06-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/hrbopenres.14181.1
Caroline McCarthy, Tom Fahey, Frank Moriarty, Michelle Flood, Eimear Loftus, Barbara Clyne
{"title":"开发和评估爱尔兰全科实践中处方质量和安全仪表板的可用性:定性研究的协议。","authors":"Caroline McCarthy, Tom Fahey, Frank Moriarty, Michelle Flood, Eimear Loftus, Barbara Clyne","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.14181.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The third WHO Global patient safety challenge, \"Medication Without Harm\" aims to reduce severe avoidable medication related ham by 50% globally. One approach to reducing medication related harm is to develop interventions that improve prescribing. Audit and feedback is one such intervention that has been shown to have an effect on professional behaviour. With advancements in the data infrastructure of primary care it is now possible to harness routine prescribing data for ongoing and up-to-date comparative benchmarking. The aim of this study was to assess the usability and usefulness of a prescribing safety dashboard developed in Irish general practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Practices utilising the data analytics platform, MedVault opted in to share anonymous prescription data to enable the development of the prescribing safety dashboard. Participants from these practices who had previously expressed an interest in taking part in this qualitative study will be formally invited to take part. Recruited prescribers will take part in an online interview with a think aloud process where they will share their screen as they navigate the dashboard and verbalise their thoughts. This will be followed by a semi-structured interview where their views on prescribing safety and receiving feedback on prescribing will be explored. For the think aloud process, screen recordings will be reviewed alongside the transcripts, and analysed using Nielsen's five quality components of usability: learnability, efficiency, memorability, error recovery and satisfaction as a framework. An inductive thematic approach will be used to analyse GPs' perspectives on prescribing safety and feedback.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will explore the usability and acceptability of a prescribing quality and safety dashboard. To design future interventions, policies, and quality improvement initiatives that make use of routine data, it is essential to understand how GPs engage with and use these tools. This understanding can help ensure such initiatives are developed in ways that maximise relevance, usability, and engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"8 ","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12381552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing and assessing the usability of a prescribing quality and safety dashboard in Irish general practice: protocol for a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline McCarthy, Tom Fahey, Frank Moriarty, Michelle Flood, Eimear Loftus, Barbara Clyne\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/hrbopenres.14181.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The third WHO Global patient safety challenge, \\\"Medication Without Harm\\\" aims to reduce severe avoidable medication related ham by 50% globally. One approach to reducing medication related harm is to develop interventions that improve prescribing. Audit and feedback is one such intervention that has been shown to have an effect on professional behaviour. With advancements in the data infrastructure of primary care it is now possible to harness routine prescribing data for ongoing and up-to-date comparative benchmarking. The aim of this study was to assess the usability and usefulness of a prescribing safety dashboard developed in Irish general practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Practices utilising the data analytics platform, MedVault opted in to share anonymous prescription data to enable the development of the prescribing safety dashboard. Participants from these practices who had previously expressed an interest in taking part in this qualitative study will be formally invited to take part. Recruited prescribers will take part in an online interview with a think aloud process where they will share their screen as they navigate the dashboard and verbalise their thoughts. This will be followed by a semi-structured interview where their views on prescribing safety and receiving feedback on prescribing will be explored. For the think aloud process, screen recordings will be reviewed alongside the transcripts, and analysed using Nielsen's five quality components of usability: learnability, efficiency, memorability, error recovery and satisfaction as a framework. An inductive thematic approach will be used to analyse GPs' perspectives on prescribing safety and feedback.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will explore the usability and acceptability of a prescribing quality and safety dashboard. To design future interventions, policies, and quality improvement initiatives that make use of routine data, it is essential to understand how GPs engage with and use these tools. This understanding can help ensure such initiatives are developed in ways that maximise relevance, usability, and engagement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HRB open research\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12381552/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HRB open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.14181.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.14181.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:世卫组织第三项全球患者安全挑战“无伤害用药”旨在将全球可避免的严重药物相关危害减少50%。减少药物相关危害的一种方法是制定干预措施,改善处方。审计和反馈就是这样一种干预,已被证明对职业行为有影响。随着初级保健数据基础设施的进步,现在可以利用常规处方数据进行持续和最新的比较基准。本研究的目的是评估爱尔兰一般实践中开发的处方安全仪表板的可用性和有用性。方法:利用数据分析平台,MedVault选择共享匿名处方数据,以实现处方安全仪表板的开发。之前表示有兴趣参加本定性研究的这些实践参与者将被正式邀请参加。被招募的处方者将参加一个在线面试,在这个过程中,他们将分享自己的屏幕,一边浏览仪表板,一边用语言表达自己的想法。随后将进行半结构化访谈,探讨他们对处方安全性和收到处方反馈的看法。在大声思考的过程中,屏幕录音将与文本一起被审查,并使用尼尔森的可用性的五个质量组成部分进行分析:易学性、效率、可记忆性、错误恢复和满意度作为框架。归纳专题方法将用于分析全科医生对处方安全性和反馈的看法。讨论:本研究将探讨处方质量和安全仪表板的可用性和可接受性。为了设计利用常规数据的未来干预措施、政策和质量改进举措,了解全科医生如何参与和使用这些工具至关重要。这种理解可以帮助确保以最大化相关性、可用性和参与度的方式开发此类计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Developing and assessing the usability of a prescribing quality and safety dashboard in Irish general practice: protocol for a qualitative study.

Developing and assessing the usability of a prescribing quality and safety dashboard in Irish general practice: protocol for a qualitative study.

Developing and assessing the usability of a prescribing quality and safety dashboard in Irish general practice: protocol for a qualitative study.

Developing and assessing the usability of a prescribing quality and safety dashboard in Irish general practice: protocol for a qualitative study.

Background: The third WHO Global patient safety challenge, "Medication Without Harm" aims to reduce severe avoidable medication related ham by 50% globally. One approach to reducing medication related harm is to develop interventions that improve prescribing. Audit and feedback is one such intervention that has been shown to have an effect on professional behaviour. With advancements in the data infrastructure of primary care it is now possible to harness routine prescribing data for ongoing and up-to-date comparative benchmarking. The aim of this study was to assess the usability and usefulness of a prescribing safety dashboard developed in Irish general practice.

Methods: Practices utilising the data analytics platform, MedVault opted in to share anonymous prescription data to enable the development of the prescribing safety dashboard. Participants from these practices who had previously expressed an interest in taking part in this qualitative study will be formally invited to take part. Recruited prescribers will take part in an online interview with a think aloud process where they will share their screen as they navigate the dashboard and verbalise their thoughts. This will be followed by a semi-structured interview where their views on prescribing safety and receiving feedback on prescribing will be explored. For the think aloud process, screen recordings will be reviewed alongside the transcripts, and analysed using Nielsen's five quality components of usability: learnability, efficiency, memorability, error recovery and satisfaction as a framework. An inductive thematic approach will be used to analyse GPs' perspectives on prescribing safety and feedback.

Discussion: This study will explore the usability and acceptability of a prescribing quality and safety dashboard. To design future interventions, policies, and quality improvement initiatives that make use of routine data, it is essential to understand how GPs engage with and use these tools. This understanding can help ensure such initiatives are developed in ways that maximise relevance, usability, and engagement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信