Ryan Yuen, Brian Lam, Shannon Melissa Chan, Hon Chi Yip, Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh
{"title":"内镜下胰腺壁脱性坏死引流后直接内镜下坏死切除术与内镜下升级入路的比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ryan Yuen, Brian Lam, Shannon Melissa Chan, Hon Chi Yip, Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh","doi":"10.1111/den.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) is a safe and effective option in the treatment of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WOPN). Whether DEN should be performed immediately after drainage (DEN) or as a step-up approach (SUA) is unknown. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare SUA with DEN in the treatment of WOPN.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Electronic databases including EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched for studies on DEN and SUA using equivalent combinations of \"DEN,\" \"Endoscopic step-up approach,\" and \"Walled-off necrosis.\" Studies were included only if they reported all primary outcomes of interest: (1) clinical success, defined as resolution of clinical symptoms of WOPN at 6 months and (2) postprocedural adverse events. Secondary outcomes were technical success, number of additional DEN required and reintervention rate, defined as number of additional DEN and other interventions required per patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 1290 patients from 15 studies were included. There were no significant differences in clinical success (SUA: 94%, 95% CI: [91%-96%]; DEN: 90%, 95% CI: [83%-94%]; p = 0.14), adverse events (SUA: 16%, 95% CI: [10%-24%]; DEN: 16%, 95% CI: [10%-24%]; p = 0.97), technical success (SUA: 99%, 95% CI: [98%-99%]; DEN: 98%, 95% CI: [95%-99%]; p = 0.07), reinterventions (SUA: 1.48, 95% CI: [0.80-2.17]; DEN: 0.99, 95% CI: [0.48-1.51]; p = 0.26), and number of additional DEN required per patient (SUA: 0.93, 95% CI: [0.45-1.39]; DEN: 1.24, 95% CI: [0.57-1.92]; p = 0.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SUA and DEN were comparable in clinical success, adverse events, technical success, reinterventions, and additional DEN required.</p>","PeriodicalId":72813,"journal":{"name":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy With Endoscopic Step-Up Approach After Endoscopic Drainage of Pancreatic Walled-Off Necrosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Yuen, Brian Lam, Shannon Melissa Chan, Hon Chi Yip, Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/den.70021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) is a safe and effective option in the treatment of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WOPN). Whether DEN should be performed immediately after drainage (DEN) or as a step-up approach (SUA) is unknown. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare SUA with DEN in the treatment of WOPN.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Electronic databases including EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched for studies on DEN and SUA using equivalent combinations of \\\"DEN,\\\" \\\"Endoscopic step-up approach,\\\" and \\\"Walled-off necrosis.\\\" Studies were included only if they reported all primary outcomes of interest: (1) clinical success, defined as resolution of clinical symptoms of WOPN at 6 months and (2) postprocedural adverse events. Secondary outcomes were technical success, number of additional DEN required and reintervention rate, defined as number of additional DEN and other interventions required per patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 1290 patients from 15 studies were included. There were no significant differences in clinical success (SUA: 94%, 95% CI: [91%-96%]; DEN: 90%, 95% CI: [83%-94%]; p = 0.14), adverse events (SUA: 16%, 95% CI: [10%-24%]; DEN: 16%, 95% CI: [10%-24%]; p = 0.97), technical success (SUA: 99%, 95% CI: [98%-99%]; DEN: 98%, 95% CI: [95%-99%]; p = 0.07), reinterventions (SUA: 1.48, 95% CI: [0.80-2.17]; DEN: 0.99, 95% CI: [0.48-1.51]; p = 0.26), and number of additional DEN required per patient (SUA: 0.93, 95% CI: [0.45-1.39]; DEN: 1.24, 95% CI: [0.57-1.92]; p = 0.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SUA and DEN were comparable in clinical success, adverse events, technical success, reinterventions, and additional DEN required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.70021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.70021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy With Endoscopic Step-Up Approach After Endoscopic Drainage of Pancreatic Walled-Off Necrosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background and study aims: Direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) is a safe and effective option in the treatment of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WOPN). Whether DEN should be performed immediately after drainage (DEN) or as a step-up approach (SUA) is unknown. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare SUA with DEN in the treatment of WOPN.
Patients and methods: Electronic databases including EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched for studies on DEN and SUA using equivalent combinations of "DEN," "Endoscopic step-up approach," and "Walled-off necrosis." Studies were included only if they reported all primary outcomes of interest: (1) clinical success, defined as resolution of clinical symptoms of WOPN at 6 months and (2) postprocedural adverse events. Secondary outcomes were technical success, number of additional DEN required and reintervention rate, defined as number of additional DEN and other interventions required per patient.
Results: In this study, 1290 patients from 15 studies were included. There were no significant differences in clinical success (SUA: 94%, 95% CI: [91%-96%]; DEN: 90%, 95% CI: [83%-94%]; p = 0.14), adverse events (SUA: 16%, 95% CI: [10%-24%]; DEN: 16%, 95% CI: [10%-24%]; p = 0.97), technical success (SUA: 99%, 95% CI: [98%-99%]; DEN: 98%, 95% CI: [95%-99%]; p = 0.07), reinterventions (SUA: 1.48, 95% CI: [0.80-2.17]; DEN: 0.99, 95% CI: [0.48-1.51]; p = 0.26), and number of additional DEN required per patient (SUA: 0.93, 95% CI: [0.45-1.39]; DEN: 1.24, 95% CI: [0.57-1.92]; p = 0.44).
Conclusions: SUA and DEN were comparable in clinical success, adverse events, technical success, reinterventions, and additional DEN required.