一项针对门诊诊所和急救中心社区获得性细菌性肺炎(CABP)的抗生素管理倡议:2023-2024年社区卫生系统经验

Tomefa E Asempa, Tyler Ackley, Kristin E Linder, Cara D Riddle, Eric Walsh, David P Nicolau
{"title":"一项针对门诊诊所和急救中心社区获得性细菌性肺炎(CABP)的抗生素管理倡议:2023-2024年社区卫生系统经验","authors":"Tomefa E Asempa, Tyler Ackley, Kristin E Linder, Cara D Riddle, Eric Walsh, David P Nicolau","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.10100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This before-after study aimed to evaluate whether an order-set intervention would improve CABP-guideline concordance among outpatients.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study included adult patients presenting to outpatient clinics (<i>n</i> = 92) and urgent care centers (<i>n</i> = 39) within a community-based health system without a formal outpatient antibiotic stewardship program (ASP).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The intervention consisted of an antibiotic order-set and awareness campaign. Patient encounters were identified via CABP ICD-10 codes and IDSA-relevant patient comorbidities (chronic heart, lung, liver, or renal disease; diabetes mellitus; alcoholism; malignancy; asplenia) were extracted from the electronic health record. Primary outcome was to describe the proportion of patients receiving concordant therapy per IDSA guideline and local antibiogram in a pre- (May 2023 - April 2024) and post-intervention period (May 2024 - December 2024).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline and intervention antibiotic concordance rate was 33.3% (1,467/4,401 encounters) and 28.0% (1,388/4,954 encounters), respectively. Among patients with no comorbidity, monotherapy prescriptions (concordant and discordant) decreased post-intervention and were replaced by higher levels of combination therapy (15% increase), albeit all discordant due to lack of comorbidities. Among patients with comorbidities, combination antibiotics increased by 12% post-intervention, driven by concordant prescriptions including amoxicillin/clavulanate plus azithromycin while the most frequently prescribed discordant combination was amoxicillin plus azithromycin. Trends were similar in primary care and urgent care centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A stewardship intervention, including an order-set and awareness campaign improved the selection of combination therapy for appropriate patients but did not improve overall guideline concordance. For health systems without a dedicated outpatient ASP, these data will help bolster stewardship efforts towards more effective strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12394021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An antibiotic stewardship initiative focused on community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in outpatient clinics and urgent care centers: a 2023-2024 community health system experience.\",\"authors\":\"Tomefa E Asempa, Tyler Ackley, Kristin E Linder, Cara D Riddle, Eric Walsh, David P Nicolau\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ash.2025.10100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This before-after study aimed to evaluate whether an order-set intervention would improve CABP-guideline concordance among outpatients.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study included adult patients presenting to outpatient clinics (<i>n</i> = 92) and urgent care centers (<i>n</i> = 39) within a community-based health system without a formal outpatient antibiotic stewardship program (ASP).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The intervention consisted of an antibiotic order-set and awareness campaign. Patient encounters were identified via CABP ICD-10 codes and IDSA-relevant patient comorbidities (chronic heart, lung, liver, or renal disease; diabetes mellitus; alcoholism; malignancy; asplenia) were extracted from the electronic health record. Primary outcome was to describe the proportion of patients receiving concordant therapy per IDSA guideline and local antibiogram in a pre- (May 2023 - April 2024) and post-intervention period (May 2024 - December 2024).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline and intervention antibiotic concordance rate was 33.3% (1,467/4,401 encounters) and 28.0% (1,388/4,954 encounters), respectively. Among patients with no comorbidity, monotherapy prescriptions (concordant and discordant) decreased post-intervention and were replaced by higher levels of combination therapy (15% increase), albeit all discordant due to lack of comorbidities. Among patients with comorbidities, combination antibiotics increased by 12% post-intervention, driven by concordant prescriptions including amoxicillin/clavulanate plus azithromycin while the most frequently prescribed discordant combination was amoxicillin plus azithromycin. Trends were similar in primary care and urgent care centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A stewardship intervention, including an order-set and awareness campaign improved the selection of combination therapy for appropriate patients but did not improve overall guideline concordance. For health systems without a dedicated outpatient ASP, these data will help bolster stewardship efforts towards more effective strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"e185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12394021/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.10100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.10100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这项前后对照研究旨在评估顺序设置干预是否能提高门诊患者cabp -指南的一致性。环境:本研究纳入了在社区卫生系统内没有正式门诊抗生素管理计划(ASP)的门诊诊所(n = 92)和紧急护理中心(n = 39)的成年患者。干预措施:干预措施包括抗生素处方设置和宣传活动。通过CABP ICD-10代码识别患者就诊情况,并从电子健康记录中提取与idsa相关的患者合并症(慢性心、肺、肝或肾疾病;糖尿病;酒精中毒;恶性肿瘤;脾功能不全)。主要结局是描述在干预前(2023年5月- 2024年4月)和干预后(2024年5月- 2024年12月),按照IDSA指南和局部抗生素谱接受协调治疗的患者比例。结果:基线和干预抗生素一致性率分别为33.3%(1467 / 4401次)和28.0%(1388 / 4954次)。在没有合并症的患者中,干预后单药处方(一致和不一致)减少,并被更高水平的联合治疗所取代(增加15%),尽管所有不一致都是由于缺乏合并症。在有合并症的患者中,阿莫西林/克拉维酸加阿奇霉素的一致性处方推动了干预后抗生素联合使用增加了12%,而阿莫西林加阿奇霉素的不一致性处方最常见。初级保健和紧急护理中心的趋势相似。结论:管理干预,包括订单设置和宣传活动,改善了对合适患者联合治疗的选择,但没有提高总体指南的一致性。对于没有专门门诊ASP的卫生系统,这些数据将有助于加强管理工作,制定更有效的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An antibiotic stewardship initiative focused on community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in outpatient clinics and urgent care centers: a 2023-2024 community health system experience.

An antibiotic stewardship initiative focused on community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in outpatient clinics and urgent care centers: a 2023-2024 community health system experience.

An antibiotic stewardship initiative focused on community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in outpatient clinics and urgent care centers: a 2023-2024 community health system experience.

An antibiotic stewardship initiative focused on community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in outpatient clinics and urgent care centers: a 2023-2024 community health system experience.

Objective: This before-after study aimed to evaluate whether an order-set intervention would improve CABP-guideline concordance among outpatients.

Setting: This study included adult patients presenting to outpatient clinics (n = 92) and urgent care centers (n = 39) within a community-based health system without a formal outpatient antibiotic stewardship program (ASP).

Intervention: The intervention consisted of an antibiotic order-set and awareness campaign. Patient encounters were identified via CABP ICD-10 codes and IDSA-relevant patient comorbidities (chronic heart, lung, liver, or renal disease; diabetes mellitus; alcoholism; malignancy; asplenia) were extracted from the electronic health record. Primary outcome was to describe the proportion of patients receiving concordant therapy per IDSA guideline and local antibiogram in a pre- (May 2023 - April 2024) and post-intervention period (May 2024 - December 2024).

Results: Baseline and intervention antibiotic concordance rate was 33.3% (1,467/4,401 encounters) and 28.0% (1,388/4,954 encounters), respectively. Among patients with no comorbidity, monotherapy prescriptions (concordant and discordant) decreased post-intervention and were replaced by higher levels of combination therapy (15% increase), albeit all discordant due to lack of comorbidities. Among patients with comorbidities, combination antibiotics increased by 12% post-intervention, driven by concordant prescriptions including amoxicillin/clavulanate plus azithromycin while the most frequently prescribed discordant combination was amoxicillin plus azithromycin. Trends were similar in primary care and urgent care centers.

Conclusions: A stewardship intervention, including an order-set and awareness campaign improved the selection of combination therapy for appropriate patients but did not improve overall guideline concordance. For health systems without a dedicated outpatient ASP, these data will help bolster stewardship efforts towards more effective strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信