Frailty as a determinant of liver transplant outcomes: A call for integrative strategies.

Frailty has emerged as a pivotal determinant of post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes, yet its integration into clinical practice remains inconsistent. Defined by functional impairments and reduced physiologic reserve, frailty transcends traditional metrics like the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, demonstrating increasing predictive value for mortality beyond the immediate post-operative period. Recent findings suggest that frail recipients experience significantly higher mortality within the first 12 months following transplantation-a period when traditional monitoring often wanes. This raises critical questions about the adequacy of current assessment and follow-up protocols. The observed dissociation between MELD scores and long-term survival underscores the limitations of existing selection criteria. Frailty, as a dynamic and modifiable condition, represents an opportunity for targeted intervention. Prehabilitation programs focusing on nutritional optimization, physical rehabilitation, and psychosocial support could enhance resilience in transplant candidates, reducing their risk profile and improving post-transplant outcomes. Furthermore, these findings call for an expanded approach to post-transplant monitoring. Extending surveillance for frail recipients beyond standard timelines may facilitate early detection of complications, mitigating their impact on survival. Incorporating frailty into both pre- and post-transplant protocols could redefine how transplant centers evaluate and manage risk. This editorial advocates for a paradigm shift: Frailty must no longer be viewed as a secondary consideration but as a core element in LT care. By addressing frailty comprehensively, we can move toward more personalized, effective strategies that improve survival and quality of life for LT recipients.