Kevin Ly, Antonio Di Carlo, Sunil S Karhadkar, Kenneth Chavin, Francesca Graziano, Kelley Maberry, Nicole Sifontis, Daohai Yu, Xiaoning Lu, Adam Diamond
{"title":"实施阿片类药物节约方案,利用脂质体布比卡因和静脉注射酮咯酸治疗活体肾脏捐献后的疼痛。","authors":"Kevin Ly, Antonio Di Carlo, Sunil S Karhadkar, Kenneth Chavin, Francesca Graziano, Kelley Maberry, Nicole Sifontis, Daohai Yu, Xiaoning Lu, Adam Diamond","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v15.i3.101518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioids are commonly used for management of post-operative pain in living kidney donors. Reducing exposure to opioids is desirable to minimize risk of dependence and potential side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and constipation which may delay discharge. Liposomal bupivacaine, ketorolac, and scheduled acetaminophen have all demonstrated efficacy for management of post-operative pain in this population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of an opioid-sparing protocol utilizing a multimodal pain management approach in living kidney donors post-nephrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center, retrospective chart review study examining 52 living kidney donors (26 pre-protocol implementation, 26 post-protocol implementation) from May 24<sup>th</sup>, 2019 to September 27<sup>th</sup>, 2023. Patients in the post-protocol group received intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine, hydromorphone PCA (until able to tolerate oral medications), 15 mg of intravenous ketorolac every 6 hours for 3 doses, and scheduled oral acetaminophen, in addition to oxycodone as needed for moderate to severe pain. The primary endpoint was oral morphine equivalent (OME) use within 48 hours post-surgery. Secondary endpoints include average daily pain scale within 48 hours post-surgery, length of stay (LOS) (days), and incidence of new acute kidney injury (AKI) or gastrointestinal (GI) bleed during admission per provider. Differences between the pre- and post-protocol implementation groups were compared utilizing the exact Wilcoxon test for continuous variables and either the Fisher's Exact or <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> test for categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the pre-protocol implementation group received more OME (mg) within 48 hours post-surgery when compared to the post-protocol group (median: 84.5 <i>vs</i> 69.0). The median of total OME over the course of admission was numerically greater the pre-protocol group (105.0 <i>vs</i> 69.0), and was significantly more per LOS (41.3 <i>vs</i> 25.7, <i>P</i> = 0.02). Average daily pain score was not statistically significantly different between the two groups on post-operative day 1 (median: 5.3 <i>vs</i> 4.4; <i>P</i> = 0.43) and post-operative day 2 (median: 4.7 <i>vs</i> 5.2; <i>P</i> = 0.96). No significant differences were found in provider-identified incidences of AKI or GI bleeding during admission. There was no difference in serum creatinine at the time of discharge between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A multimodal, opioid-sparing pain management protocol was as effective for pain control and resulted in significantly less opioid daily exposure over LOS. No adverse events were found related to use of ketorolac in patients undergoing donor nephrectomy. Our findings suggest that an opioid-sparing protocol is both safe and effective at minimizing opioid exposure and managing post-operative pain within the first 48 hours post-surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":65557,"journal":{"name":"世界移植杂志","volume":"15 3","pages":"101518"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12038593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of an opioid-sparing protocol utilizing liposomal bupivacaine and intravenous ketorolac for pain management after living kidney donation.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Ly, Antonio Di Carlo, Sunil S Karhadkar, Kenneth Chavin, Francesca Graziano, Kelley Maberry, Nicole Sifontis, Daohai Yu, Xiaoning Lu, Adam Diamond\",\"doi\":\"10.5500/wjt.v15.i3.101518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioids are commonly used for management of post-operative pain in living kidney donors. Reducing exposure to opioids is desirable to minimize risk of dependence and potential side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and constipation which may delay discharge. Liposomal bupivacaine, ketorolac, and scheduled acetaminophen have all demonstrated efficacy for management of post-operative pain in this population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of an opioid-sparing protocol utilizing a multimodal pain management approach in living kidney donors post-nephrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center, retrospective chart review study examining 52 living kidney donors (26 pre-protocol implementation, 26 post-protocol implementation) from May 24<sup>th</sup>, 2019 to September 27<sup>th</sup>, 2023. Patients in the post-protocol group received intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine, hydromorphone PCA (until able to tolerate oral medications), 15 mg of intravenous ketorolac every 6 hours for 3 doses, and scheduled oral acetaminophen, in addition to oxycodone as needed for moderate to severe pain. The primary endpoint was oral morphine equivalent (OME) use within 48 hours post-surgery. Secondary endpoints include average daily pain scale within 48 hours post-surgery, length of stay (LOS) (days), and incidence of new acute kidney injury (AKI) or gastrointestinal (GI) bleed during admission per provider. Differences between the pre- and post-protocol implementation groups were compared utilizing the exact Wilcoxon test for continuous variables and either the Fisher's Exact or <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> test for categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the pre-protocol implementation group received more OME (mg) within 48 hours post-surgery when compared to the post-protocol group (median: 84.5 <i>vs</i> 69.0). The median of total OME over the course of admission was numerically greater the pre-protocol group (105.0 <i>vs</i> 69.0), and was significantly more per LOS (41.3 <i>vs</i> 25.7, <i>P</i> = 0.02). Average daily pain score was not statistically significantly different between the two groups on post-operative day 1 (median: 5.3 <i>vs</i> 4.4; <i>P</i> = 0.43) and post-operative day 2 (median: 4.7 <i>vs</i> 5.2; <i>P</i> = 0.96). No significant differences were found in provider-identified incidences of AKI or GI bleeding during admission. There was no difference in serum creatinine at the time of discharge between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A multimodal, opioid-sparing pain management protocol was as effective for pain control and resulted in significantly less opioid daily exposure over LOS. No adverse events were found related to use of ketorolac in patients undergoing donor nephrectomy. Our findings suggest that an opioid-sparing protocol is both safe and effective at minimizing opioid exposure and managing post-operative pain within the first 48 hours post-surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":65557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"世界移植杂志\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"101518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12038593/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"世界移植杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v15.i3.101518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界移植杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v15.i3.101518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:阿片类药物通常用于治疗活体肾供者术后疼痛。减少阿片类药物的暴露是可取的,以尽量减少依赖的风险和潜在的副作用,如恶心、呕吐和便秘,可能延迟出院。布比卡因、酮咯酸脂质体和对乙酰氨基酚均被证明对该人群的术后疼痛有效。目的:评估在活体肾切除术后使用多模式疼痛管理方法的阿片类药物节约方案的有效性和安全性。方法:2019年5月24日至2023年9月27日,对52例活体肾供者(方案实施前26例,方案实施后26例)进行单中心、回顾性图表回顾研究。方案后组患者术中接受布比卡因脂体、氢吗啡酮PCA(直到能够耐受口服药物),每6小时静脉注射15 mg酮乐酸,共3次,并计划口服对乙酰氨基酚,此外根据需要羟考酮治疗中度至重度疼痛。主要终点是术后48小时内口服吗啡当量(OME)的使用。次要终点包括术后48小时内的平均每日疼痛评分、住院时间(LOS)(天)、住院期间新发急性肾损伤(AKI)或胃肠道(GI)出血的发生率。使用连续变量的精确Wilcoxon检验和分类变量的Fisher's exact或χ 2检验比较方案实施前后组之间的差异。结果:与方案后组相比,方案前实施组患者在术后48小时内接受了更多的OME (mg)(中位数:84.5 vs 69.0)。入院过程中总OME的中位数在数字上高于方案前组(105.0 vs 69.0),并且每个LOS的中位数明显更高(41.3 vs 25.7, P = 0.02)。两组患者术后第1天(中位数:5.3 vs 4.4; P = 0.43)和术后第2天(中位数:4.7 vs 5.2; P = 0.96)的平均每日疼痛评分差异无统计学意义。入院期间由提供者确定的AKI或胃肠道出血发生率无显著差异。两组患者出院时血清肌酐水平无差异。结论:多模式,阿片类药物的疼痛管理方案是有效的疼痛控制,并导致明显减少阿片类药物每日暴露在LOS。在接受供体肾切除术的患者中,未发现与使用酮罗拉酸相关的不良事件。我们的研究结果表明,在减少阿片类药物暴露和术后48小时内控制术后疼痛方面,阿片类药物节约方案既安全又有效。
Implementation of an opioid-sparing protocol utilizing liposomal bupivacaine and intravenous ketorolac for pain management after living kidney donation.
Background: Opioids are commonly used for management of post-operative pain in living kidney donors. Reducing exposure to opioids is desirable to minimize risk of dependence and potential side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and constipation which may delay discharge. Liposomal bupivacaine, ketorolac, and scheduled acetaminophen have all demonstrated efficacy for management of post-operative pain in this population.
Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of an opioid-sparing protocol utilizing a multimodal pain management approach in living kidney donors post-nephrectomy.
Methods: Single-center, retrospective chart review study examining 52 living kidney donors (26 pre-protocol implementation, 26 post-protocol implementation) from May 24th, 2019 to September 27th, 2023. Patients in the post-protocol group received intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine, hydromorphone PCA (until able to tolerate oral medications), 15 mg of intravenous ketorolac every 6 hours for 3 doses, and scheduled oral acetaminophen, in addition to oxycodone as needed for moderate to severe pain. The primary endpoint was oral morphine equivalent (OME) use within 48 hours post-surgery. Secondary endpoints include average daily pain scale within 48 hours post-surgery, length of stay (LOS) (days), and incidence of new acute kidney injury (AKI) or gastrointestinal (GI) bleed during admission per provider. Differences between the pre- and post-protocol implementation groups were compared utilizing the exact Wilcoxon test for continuous variables and either the Fisher's Exact or χ2 test for categorical variables.
Results: Patients in the pre-protocol implementation group received more OME (mg) within 48 hours post-surgery when compared to the post-protocol group (median: 84.5 vs 69.0). The median of total OME over the course of admission was numerically greater the pre-protocol group (105.0 vs 69.0), and was significantly more per LOS (41.3 vs 25.7, P = 0.02). Average daily pain score was not statistically significantly different between the two groups on post-operative day 1 (median: 5.3 vs 4.4; P = 0.43) and post-operative day 2 (median: 4.7 vs 5.2; P = 0.96). No significant differences were found in provider-identified incidences of AKI or GI bleeding during admission. There was no difference in serum creatinine at the time of discharge between the two groups.
Conclusion: A multimodal, opioid-sparing pain management protocol was as effective for pain control and resulted in significantly less opioid daily exposure over LOS. No adverse events were found related to use of ketorolac in patients undergoing donor nephrectomy. Our findings suggest that an opioid-sparing protocol is both safe and effective at minimizing opioid exposure and managing post-operative pain within the first 48 hours post-surgery.