{"title":"腹部大手术后非阿片类镇痛药使用趋势:一项回顾性单中心队列研究。","authors":"Soo-Hyuk Yoon, Ho-Jin Lee","doi":"10.3344/kjp.25131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-opioid analgesics are essential in multimodal analgesia and opioid-sparing strategies; however, their clinical use remains suboptimal. This study aimed to investigate trends in perioperative non-opioid analgesic administration and associated adverse effects in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery at a tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prescription data for acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were retrospectively collected from January 2020 to December 2024. Actual administration was assessed at three perioperative phases: preemptive, intraoperative, and postoperative (postoperative day [POD] 0-3). The study period was divided into 20 quarters. Trends of administration rates over time were analyzed using a linear regression model. Postoperative drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and acute kidney injury (AKI) were evaluated, and Poisson regression was applied to adjust for covariates within each quarter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24,688 surgical cases involving 24,084 patients were analyzed. The administration rate of acetaminophen exhibited a significant upward trend throughout the study from the preemptive phase to POD 2. NSAID administration increased significantly, mainly up to POD 1, though the overall magnitude of the increase was modest. Postoperatively, less than 5% of patients received both analgesic classes concurrently. The analgesic administration rate was not significantly associated with DILI or AKI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of non-opioid analgesics for major abdominal surgery has increased significantly over the past 5 years. However, their overall utilization, particularly postoperatively, remains limited. Further efforts are required to promote their broader integration into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":56252,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"401-411"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in non-opioid analgesic use following major abdominal surgery: a retrospective single-center cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Soo-Hyuk Yoon, Ho-Jin Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3344/kjp.25131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-opioid analgesics are essential in multimodal analgesia and opioid-sparing strategies; however, their clinical use remains suboptimal. This study aimed to investigate trends in perioperative non-opioid analgesic administration and associated adverse effects in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery at a tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prescription data for acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were retrospectively collected from January 2020 to December 2024. Actual administration was assessed at three perioperative phases: preemptive, intraoperative, and postoperative (postoperative day [POD] 0-3). The study period was divided into 20 quarters. Trends of administration rates over time were analyzed using a linear regression model. Postoperative drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and acute kidney injury (AKI) were evaluated, and Poisson regression was applied to adjust for covariates within each quarter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24,688 surgical cases involving 24,084 patients were analyzed. The administration rate of acetaminophen exhibited a significant upward trend throughout the study from the preemptive phase to POD 2. NSAID administration increased significantly, mainly up to POD 1, though the overall magnitude of the increase was modest. Postoperatively, less than 5% of patients received both analgesic classes concurrently. The analgesic administration rate was not significantly associated with DILI or AKI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of non-opioid analgesics for major abdominal surgery has increased significantly over the past 5 years. However, their overall utilization, particularly postoperatively, remains limited. Further efforts are required to promote their broader integration into clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"401-411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485472/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.25131\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.25131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trends in non-opioid analgesic use following major abdominal surgery: a retrospective single-center cohort study.
Background: Non-opioid analgesics are essential in multimodal analgesia and opioid-sparing strategies; however, their clinical use remains suboptimal. This study aimed to investigate trends in perioperative non-opioid analgesic administration and associated adverse effects in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery at a tertiary hospital.
Methods: Prescription data for acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were retrospectively collected from January 2020 to December 2024. Actual administration was assessed at three perioperative phases: preemptive, intraoperative, and postoperative (postoperative day [POD] 0-3). The study period was divided into 20 quarters. Trends of administration rates over time were analyzed using a linear regression model. Postoperative drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and acute kidney injury (AKI) were evaluated, and Poisson regression was applied to adjust for covariates within each quarter.
Results: A total of 24,688 surgical cases involving 24,084 patients were analyzed. The administration rate of acetaminophen exhibited a significant upward trend throughout the study from the preemptive phase to POD 2. NSAID administration increased significantly, mainly up to POD 1, though the overall magnitude of the increase was modest. Postoperatively, less than 5% of patients received both analgesic classes concurrently. The analgesic administration rate was not significantly associated with DILI or AKI.
Conclusions: The use of non-opioid analgesics for major abdominal surgery has increased significantly over the past 5 years. However, their overall utilization, particularly postoperatively, remains limited. Further efforts are required to promote their broader integration into clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Korean Journal of Pain (Korean J Pain, KJP) is the official journal of the Korean Pain Society, founded in 1986. It has been published since 1988. It publishes peer reviewed original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. It has been published quarterly in English since 2009 (on the first day of January, April, July, and October). In addition, it has also become the official journal of the International Spinal Pain Society since 2016. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals. The circulation number per issue is 50.