Trisha Tee, Noel Abboud, Bilal Tarabay, Abdulmajeed Albeloushi, Puja Pachchigar, Mohamed Alhantoobi, Nour Abou Hamdan, Recai Yilmaz, Ali Fazlollahi, Rolando F Del Maestro
{"title":"椎弓根螺钉置入外科脊柱模拟器的外观、内容、结构和收敛有效性。","authors":"Trisha Tee, Noel Abboud, Bilal Tarabay, Abdulmajeed Albeloushi, Puja Pachchigar, Mohamed Alhantoobi, Nour Abou Hamdan, Recai Yilmaz, Ali Fazlollahi, Rolando F Del Maestro","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2025.10404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spine simulators offer learners risk-free environments to develop psychomotor skills for pedicle screw insertions. The virtual reality TSYM simulator deconstructs and simulates pedicle screw insertions. This case series study investigates face, content, construct, and convergent validity of an L4-L5 bilateral pedicle screw insertion on the TSYM simulator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Neurosurgical-orthopedic residents, fellows, and spine surgeons performed an L4-L5 bilateral pedicle screw insertion on the TSYM simulator. Participants were classified a priori into skilled (postgraduate year (PGY) 5-6, fellows, and consultant neurosurgeons or orthopedic surgeons) or less skilled (PGY 1-4) groups. Face and content validity were assessed utilizing a 7-point Likert scale. Construct validity was determined by investigating group differences in simulation-derived performance metrics and the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) ratings. Convergent validity was examined by correlating simulation-derived performance metrics and OSATS ratings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen skilled and 14 less skilled participants were included in this study. Eight of nine face and content validity statements were rated a median ≥ 4. Significant differences between the groups were found for four simulation-derived performance metrics (<i>P</i> < 0.05) and all OSATS categories (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Three simulation-derived performance metrics (maximum force and tool contact using the simulated screwdriver and three-dimensional velocity using the tap) significantly correlated with OSATS ratings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The L4-L5 bilateral pedicle screw insertion simulation on the TSYM platform demonstrated mixed and variable evidence for face, content, construct and convergent validity, supporting its educational potential for spine surgery training, but improvements are needed to optimize learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":56134,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Face, Content, Construct and Convergent Validity of a Surgical Spine Simulator for Pedicle Screw Insertions.\",\"authors\":\"Trisha Tee, Noel Abboud, Bilal Tarabay, Abdulmajeed Albeloushi, Puja Pachchigar, Mohamed Alhantoobi, Nour Abou Hamdan, Recai Yilmaz, Ali Fazlollahi, Rolando F Del Maestro\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cjn.2025.10404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spine simulators offer learners risk-free environments to develop psychomotor skills for pedicle screw insertions. The virtual reality TSYM simulator deconstructs and simulates pedicle screw insertions. This case series study investigates face, content, construct, and convergent validity of an L4-L5 bilateral pedicle screw insertion on the TSYM simulator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Neurosurgical-orthopedic residents, fellows, and spine surgeons performed an L4-L5 bilateral pedicle screw insertion on the TSYM simulator. Participants were classified a priori into skilled (postgraduate year (PGY) 5-6, fellows, and consultant neurosurgeons or orthopedic surgeons) or less skilled (PGY 1-4) groups. Face and content validity were assessed utilizing a 7-point Likert scale. Construct validity was determined by investigating group differences in simulation-derived performance metrics and the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) ratings. Convergent validity was examined by correlating simulation-derived performance metrics and OSATS ratings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen skilled and 14 less skilled participants were included in this study. Eight of nine face and content validity statements were rated a median ≥ 4. Significant differences between the groups were found for four simulation-derived performance metrics (<i>P</i> < 0.05) and all OSATS categories (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Three simulation-derived performance metrics (maximum force and tool contact using the simulated screwdriver and three-dimensional velocity using the tap) significantly correlated with OSATS ratings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The L4-L5 bilateral pedicle screw insertion simulation on the TSYM platform demonstrated mixed and variable evidence for face, content, construct and convergent validity, supporting its educational potential for spine surgery training, but improvements are needed to optimize learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2025.10404\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2025.10404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Face, Content, Construct and Convergent Validity of a Surgical Spine Simulator for Pedicle Screw Insertions.
Background: Spine simulators offer learners risk-free environments to develop psychomotor skills for pedicle screw insertions. The virtual reality TSYM simulator deconstructs and simulates pedicle screw insertions. This case series study investigates face, content, construct, and convergent validity of an L4-L5 bilateral pedicle screw insertion on the TSYM simulator.
Methods: Neurosurgical-orthopedic residents, fellows, and spine surgeons performed an L4-L5 bilateral pedicle screw insertion on the TSYM simulator. Participants were classified a priori into skilled (postgraduate year (PGY) 5-6, fellows, and consultant neurosurgeons or orthopedic surgeons) or less skilled (PGY 1-4) groups. Face and content validity were assessed utilizing a 7-point Likert scale. Construct validity was determined by investigating group differences in simulation-derived performance metrics and the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) ratings. Convergent validity was examined by correlating simulation-derived performance metrics and OSATS ratings.
Results: Thirteen skilled and 14 less skilled participants were included in this study. Eight of nine face and content validity statements were rated a median ≥ 4. Significant differences between the groups were found for four simulation-derived performance metrics (P < 0.05) and all OSATS categories (P < 0.001). Three simulation-derived performance metrics (maximum force and tool contact using the simulated screwdriver and three-dimensional velocity using the tap) significantly correlated with OSATS ratings.
Conclusion: The L4-L5 bilateral pedicle screw insertion simulation on the TSYM platform demonstrated mixed and variable evidence for face, content, construct and convergent validity, supporting its educational potential for spine surgery training, but improvements are needed to optimize learning.
期刊介绍:
Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences is the official publication of the four member societies of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation -- Canadian Neurological Society (CNS), Canadian Association of Child Neurology (CACN), Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS), Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists (CSCN). The Journal is a widely circulated internationally recognized medical journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles. The Journal is published in January, March, May, July, September, and November in an online only format. The first Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (the Journal) was published in 1974 in Winnipeg. In 1981, the Journal became the official publication of the member societies of the CNSF.