HbA1c、糖化白蛋白和空腹血糖在HIV感染者血糖评估中的比较分析

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Chih-Wei Liang, Shin-Huei Kuo, Chun-Yuan Lee, Shang-Yi Lin, Ya-Ting Chang, Chung-Hao Huang, Tun-Chieh Chen, Chun-Yu Lin, Jih-Jin Tsai, Yen-Hsu Chen, Po-Liang Lu
{"title":"HbA1c、糖化白蛋白和空腹血糖在HIV感染者血糖评估中的比较分析","authors":"Chih-Wei Liang, Shin-Huei Kuo, Chun-Yuan Lee, Shang-Yi Lin, Ya-Ting Chang, Chung-Hao Huang, Tun-Chieh Chen, Chun-Yu Lin, Jih-Jin Tsai, Yen-Hsu Chen, Po-Liang Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.jmii.2025.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People living with HIV (PLWH) are at increased risk for metabolic disorders, including diabetes and prediabetes. While hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is widely used for glycemic assessment, its reliability in PLWH is questioned due to altered red blood cell turnover. Glycated albumin (GA) has been proposed as an alternative, but its diagnostic utility remains unclear in PLWH. This study aims to compare the correlations of HbA1c and GA with fasting plasma glucose (FPG), evaluate their diagnostic performance, and identify factors influencing discrepancies between them in PLWH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study included 236 PLWH with documented FPG, HbA1c, and GA levels. Correlations between glycemic markers were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Diagnostic performance for prediabetes and diabetes was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and a GA cut-off was determined using the Youden index. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of HbA1c-GA mismatch.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HbA1c showed a moderate correlation with FPG (r = 0.33, p value < 0.001), while GA had a weaker correlation (r = 0.18, p value = 0.005). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detecting glycemic abnormalities was 0.66 for HbA1c and 0.57 for GA. The optimal GA cut-off for prediabetes derived from ROC analysis was 12.42 %, improving sensitivity but reducing specificity. Multivariable analysis identified low mean corpuscular volume (MCV <80 fL) as an independent predictor of HbA1c-GA mismatch (odds ratio = 4.94, 95 % confidence interval: 1.95-12.50, pvalue < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HbA1c or GA alone do not reliably capture glycemic abnormalities in PLWH. A lower GA cut-off (12.42 %) for prediabetes improves sensitivity but remains suboptimal. A combined approach incorporating FPG is recommended to enhance prediabetes and diabetes screening accuracy in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":56117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of HbA1c, glycated albumin, and fasting plasma glucose for glycemic assessment in people living with HIV.\",\"authors\":\"Chih-Wei Liang, Shin-Huei Kuo, Chun-Yuan Lee, Shang-Yi Lin, Ya-Ting Chang, Chung-Hao Huang, Tun-Chieh Chen, Chun-Yu Lin, Jih-Jin Tsai, Yen-Hsu Chen, Po-Liang Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmii.2025.08.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People living with HIV (PLWH) are at increased risk for metabolic disorders, including diabetes and prediabetes. While hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is widely used for glycemic assessment, its reliability in PLWH is questioned due to altered red blood cell turnover. Glycated albumin (GA) has been proposed as an alternative, but its diagnostic utility remains unclear in PLWH. This study aims to compare the correlations of HbA1c and GA with fasting plasma glucose (FPG), evaluate their diagnostic performance, and identify factors influencing discrepancies between them in PLWH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study included 236 PLWH with documented FPG, HbA1c, and GA levels. Correlations between glycemic markers were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Diagnostic performance for prediabetes and diabetes was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and a GA cut-off was determined using the Youden index. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of HbA1c-GA mismatch.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HbA1c showed a moderate correlation with FPG (r = 0.33, p value < 0.001), while GA had a weaker correlation (r = 0.18, p value = 0.005). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detecting glycemic abnormalities was 0.66 for HbA1c and 0.57 for GA. The optimal GA cut-off for prediabetes derived from ROC analysis was 12.42 %, improving sensitivity but reducing specificity. Multivariable analysis identified low mean corpuscular volume (MCV <80 fL) as an independent predictor of HbA1c-GA mismatch (odds ratio = 4.94, 95 % confidence interval: 1.95-12.50, pvalue < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HbA1c or GA alone do not reliably capture glycemic abnormalities in PLWH. A lower GA cut-off (12.42 %) for prediabetes improves sensitivity but remains suboptimal. A combined approach incorporating FPG is recommended to enhance prediabetes and diabetes screening accuracy in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2025.08.013\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2025.08.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)发生代谢紊乱的风险增加,包括糖尿病和前驱糖尿病。虽然糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)被广泛用于血糖评估,但由于红细胞周转的改变,其在PLWH中的可靠性受到质疑。糖化白蛋白(GA)已被提议作为一种替代方法,但其在PLWH中的诊断效用尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较HbA1c、GA与空腹血糖(FPG)的相关性,评价其在PLWH诊断中的作用,并找出影响二者差异的因素。方法:这项回顾性横断面研究包括236名记录FPG、HbA1c和GA水平的PLWH。使用Pearson相关系数评估血糖指标之间的相关性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估前驱糖尿病和糖尿病的诊断效果,并采用约登指数确定GA截止值。采用多变量logistic回归来确定HbA1c-GA失配的预测因素。结果:HbA1c与FPG呈中等相关性(r = 0.33, p值)。结论:单独HbA1c或GA不能可靠地反映PLWH的血糖异常。糖尿病前期较低的GA临界值(12.42%)改善了敏感性,但仍然不够理想。建议采用结合FPG的联合方法来提高该人群中糖尿病前期和糖尿病筛查的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative analysis of HbA1c, glycated albumin, and fasting plasma glucose for glycemic assessment in people living with HIV.

Background: People living with HIV (PLWH) are at increased risk for metabolic disorders, including diabetes and prediabetes. While hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is widely used for glycemic assessment, its reliability in PLWH is questioned due to altered red blood cell turnover. Glycated albumin (GA) has been proposed as an alternative, but its diagnostic utility remains unclear in PLWH. This study aims to compare the correlations of HbA1c and GA with fasting plasma glucose (FPG), evaluate their diagnostic performance, and identify factors influencing discrepancies between them in PLWH.

Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 236 PLWH with documented FPG, HbA1c, and GA levels. Correlations between glycemic markers were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Diagnostic performance for prediabetes and diabetes was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and a GA cut-off was determined using the Youden index. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of HbA1c-GA mismatch.

Results: HbA1c showed a moderate correlation with FPG (r = 0.33, p value < 0.001), while GA had a weaker correlation (r = 0.18, p value = 0.005). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detecting glycemic abnormalities was 0.66 for HbA1c and 0.57 for GA. The optimal GA cut-off for prediabetes derived from ROC analysis was 12.42 %, improving sensitivity but reducing specificity. Multivariable analysis identified low mean corpuscular volume (MCV <80 fL) as an independent predictor of HbA1c-GA mismatch (odds ratio = 4.94, 95 % confidence interval: 1.95-12.50, pvalue < 0.001).

Conclusion: HbA1c or GA alone do not reliably capture glycemic abnormalities in PLWH. A lower GA cut-off (12.42 %) for prediabetes improves sensitivity but remains suboptimal. A combined approach incorporating FPG is recommended to enhance prediabetes and diabetes screening accuracy in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
159
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection is an open access journal, committed to disseminating information on the latest trends and advances in microbiology, immunology, infectious diseases and parasitology. Article types considered include perspectives, review articles, original articles, brief reports and correspondence. With the aim of promoting effective and accurate scientific information, an expert panel of referees constitutes the backbone of the peer-review process in evaluating the quality and content of manuscripts submitted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信