颈部面部黑色素瘤3年无复发的生存研究:未分析前哨淋巴结的影响。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Pauline Tschamber, Elise Boudousq, Leila Essid, Bertille Bonniaud, Géraldine Jeudy, Anne Fevre, Karine Goueslard, David Guillier
{"title":"颈部面部黑色素瘤3年无复发的生存研究:未分析前哨淋巴结的影响。","authors":"Pauline Tschamber, Elise Boudousq, Leila Essid, Bertille Bonniaud, Géraldine Jeudy, Anne Fevre, Karine Goueslard, David Guillier","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prevalence of melanoma of the head and neck has been steadily increasing over the last decades. Until now, sentinel lymph node analysis has been the most important prognostic factor for survival in the management of melanoma. The cervicofacial region has a complex lymphatic drainage system and sentinel node biopsy in this region is still the subject of debate. The main objective of this study was to compare the 3-year recurrence-free survival of patients who had undergone a successful sentinel node procedure with that of patients who had not undergone sentinel node analysis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The observational and retrospective study focused on patients with cervicofacial melanoma who were treated at the Dijon University Hospital for a surgical and technical revision of the sentinel lymph node between January 2005 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight patients were included, 47 of whom were able to undergo surgery and benefit from the sentinel node technique. The main reason for the failure of this technique was the impossibility of locating the sentinel node during preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (52.4 %). No statistically significant difference (p = 0.87) in 3-year recurrence-free survival was observed between the group of patients who did not undergo a successful sentinel node procedure and the group of patients who were able to fully benefit from it.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three-year recurrence-free survival was not affected by the absence of sentinel node analysis in cases of melanoma of the head and neck when indicated, compared to sentinel node removal and analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102536"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival study of cervico-facial melanomas at 3 years without recurrence: impact of non-analysis of the sentinel lymph node.\",\"authors\":\"Pauline Tschamber, Elise Boudousq, Leila Essid, Bertille Bonniaud, Géraldine Jeudy, Anne Fevre, Karine Goueslard, David Guillier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prevalence of melanoma of the head and neck has been steadily increasing over the last decades. Until now, sentinel lymph node analysis has been the most important prognostic factor for survival in the management of melanoma. The cervicofacial region has a complex lymphatic drainage system and sentinel node biopsy in this region is still the subject of debate. The main objective of this study was to compare the 3-year recurrence-free survival of patients who had undergone a successful sentinel node procedure with that of patients who had not undergone sentinel node analysis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The observational and retrospective study focused on patients with cervicofacial melanoma who were treated at the Dijon University Hospital for a surgical and technical revision of the sentinel lymph node between January 2005 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight patients were included, 47 of whom were able to undergo surgery and benefit from the sentinel node technique. The main reason for the failure of this technique was the impossibility of locating the sentinel node during preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (52.4 %). No statistically significant difference (p = 0.87) in 3-year recurrence-free survival was observed between the group of patients who did not undergo a successful sentinel node procedure and the group of patients who were able to fully benefit from it.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three-year recurrence-free survival was not affected by the absence of sentinel node analysis in cases of melanoma of the head and neck when indicated, compared to sentinel node removal and analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102536\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102536","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,头颈部黑色素瘤的患病率一直在稳步上升。到目前为止,前哨淋巴结分析一直是黑色素瘤治疗中最重要的预后因素。颈面区有一个复杂的淋巴引流系统,该区域的前哨淋巴结活检仍然是争论的主题。本研究的主要目的是比较成功接受前哨淋巴结手术的患者与未接受前哨淋巴结分析的患者的3年无复发生存率。方法:对2005年1月至2021年12月期间在第戎大学医院接受前哨淋巴结手术和技术翻修治疗的颈面黑色素瘤患者进行观察性和回顾性研究。结果:68例患者纳入,其中47例能够接受手术并受益于前哨淋巴结技术。该技术失败的主要原因是术前淋巴显像无法定位前哨淋巴结(52.4%)。未接受成功前哨淋巴结手术的患者组与完全受益于前哨淋巴结手术的患者组的3年无复发生存率无统计学差异(p = 0.87)。结论:与前哨淋巴结切除和分析相比,头颈部黑色素瘤患者在有指征时不进行前哨淋巴结分析不影响三年无复发生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survival study of cervico-facial melanomas at 3 years without recurrence: impact of non-analysis of the sentinel lymph node.

Introduction: The prevalence of melanoma of the head and neck has been steadily increasing over the last decades. Until now, sentinel lymph node analysis has been the most important prognostic factor for survival in the management of melanoma. The cervicofacial region has a complex lymphatic drainage system and sentinel node biopsy in this region is still the subject of debate. The main objective of this study was to compare the 3-year recurrence-free survival of patients who had undergone a successful sentinel node procedure with that of patients who had not undergone sentinel node analysis.

Method: The observational and retrospective study focused on patients with cervicofacial melanoma who were treated at the Dijon University Hospital for a surgical and technical revision of the sentinel lymph node between January 2005 and December 2021.

Results: Sixty-eight patients were included, 47 of whom were able to undergo surgery and benefit from the sentinel node technique. The main reason for the failure of this technique was the impossibility of locating the sentinel node during preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (52.4 %). No statistically significant difference (p = 0.87) in 3-year recurrence-free survival was observed between the group of patients who did not undergo a successful sentinel node procedure and the group of patients who were able to fully benefit from it.

Conclusion: Three-year recurrence-free survival was not affected by the absence of sentinel node analysis in cases of melanoma of the head and neck when indicated, compared to sentinel node removal and analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
305
期刊介绍: J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics. Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must: Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise; Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research; Be solely the work of the author(s) stated; Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal; Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed. Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信