一种新型硅酸钙基水泥、生物牙牙汀和CEM水泥对皮下结缔组织反应的比较研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Omolbanin Shahraki, Alireza Sarhadi, Samira Shahraki, Aslam Dehvari, Eshagh Ali Saberi
{"title":"一种新型硅酸钙基水泥、生物牙牙汀和CEM水泥对皮下结缔组织反应的比较研究。","authors":"Omolbanin Shahraki, Alireza Sarhadi, Samira Shahraki, Aslam Dehvari, Eshagh Ali Saberi","doi":"10.1111/aej.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the biocompatibility of newly synthesised cement (Nanodentin) in comparison with Biodentine and CEM cement. The cements were implanted in rat skin and tissue reactions were assessed after 7, 30 and 60 days. H&E staining was used to measure the inflammatory response, the number of inflammatory cells and the presence of necrosis. The agar punch method was used for the antibacterial assay. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in terms of inflammation between Biodentine, CEM cement and Nanodentin with negative control. All cements induced a mild to moderate inflammatory reaction at day 7, which decreased over time. Nanodentin had the lowest number of inflammatory cells and necrosis among the tested materials. Nanodentin was biocompatible and well tolerated by subcutaneous tissues and had similar or better properties than the commercially available cements. It also exhibited good antibacterial activity compared to controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":55581,"journal":{"name":"Australian Endodontic Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to A Novel Calcium Silicate Based Cement, Biodentine and CEM Cement.\",\"authors\":\"Omolbanin Shahraki, Alireza Sarhadi, Samira Shahraki, Aslam Dehvari, Eshagh Ali Saberi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aej.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the biocompatibility of newly synthesised cement (Nanodentin) in comparison with Biodentine and CEM cement. The cements were implanted in rat skin and tissue reactions were assessed after 7, 30 and 60 days. H&E staining was used to measure the inflammatory response, the number of inflammatory cells and the presence of necrosis. The agar punch method was used for the antibacterial assay. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in terms of inflammation between Biodentine, CEM cement and Nanodentin with negative control. All cements induced a mild to moderate inflammatory reaction at day 7, which decreased over time. Nanodentin had the lowest number of inflammatory cells and necrosis among the tested materials. Nanodentin was biocompatible and well tolerated by subcutaneous tissues and had similar or better properties than the commercially available cements. It also exhibited good antibacterial activity compared to controls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.70006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.70006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评价新合成的骨水泥(纳米牙牙素)与生物牙牙素和CEM骨水泥的生物相容性。将骨水泥植入大鼠皮肤,于7、30、60天后观察组织反应。H&E染色检测炎症反应、炎症细胞数量及坏死情况。采用琼脂冲孔法进行抑菌试验。原假设为阴性对照的Biodentine、CEM水泥和Nanodentin在炎症方面没有差异。所有骨水泥在第7天诱导轻度至中度炎症反应,随时间减少。纳米牙髓素的炎症细胞和坏死细胞数量最少。纳米牙素具有生物相容性和良好的皮下组织耐受性,具有与市售水泥相似或更好的性能。与对照组相比,它也表现出良好的抗菌活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to A Novel Calcium Silicate Based Cement, Biodentine and CEM Cement.

This study aimed to evaluate the biocompatibility of newly synthesised cement (Nanodentin) in comparison with Biodentine and CEM cement. The cements were implanted in rat skin and tissue reactions were assessed after 7, 30 and 60 days. H&E staining was used to measure the inflammatory response, the number of inflammatory cells and the presence of necrosis. The agar punch method was used for the antibacterial assay. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in terms of inflammation between Biodentine, CEM cement and Nanodentin with negative control. All cements induced a mild to moderate inflammatory reaction at day 7, which decreased over time. Nanodentin had the lowest number of inflammatory cells and necrosis among the tested materials. Nanodentin was biocompatible and well tolerated by subcutaneous tissues and had similar or better properties than the commercially available cements. It also exhibited good antibacterial activity compared to controls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Endodontic Journal
Australian Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
99
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Endodontic Journal provides a forum for communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for all specialists and dentists with an interest in the morphology, physiology, and pathology of the human tooth, in particular the dental pulp, root and peri-radicular tissues. The Journal features regular clinical updates, research reports and case reports from authors worldwide, and also publishes meeting abstracts, society news and historical endodontic glimpses. The Australian Endodontic Journal is a publication for dentists in general and specialist practice devoted solely to endodontics. It aims to promote communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for those dentists who have a special interest in endodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信