Joshua D Smith, Richard A Raad, Shaum Sridharan, Kevin J Contrera, Seungwon Kim, Jessica H Maxwell, Steven B Chinn, Jose P Zevallos, Matthew E Spector
{"title":"现代头颈部肿瘤和重建手术的两组方法:消融考虑。","authors":"Joshua D Smith, Richard A Raad, Shaum Sridharan, Kevin J Contrera, Seungwon Kim, Jessica H Maxwell, Steven B Chinn, Jose P Zevallos, Matthew E Spector","doi":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000001080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Two-team approaches to head and neck cancer ablation and free flap reconstruction now occur concurrently in most centers. While the functional outcomes after head and neck ablation and reconstruction are typically examined through the lens of the reconstructive surgeon, optimizing the patient's functional outcome requires careful considerations of the entire surgical team. This review summarizes important intraoperative considerations for decision making by the surgical team, with a particular emphasis on ablative considerations, to optimize reconstructive outcomes after tumor extirpation.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Intraoperatively, dynamic and deliberate communication between the ablative and reconstructive surgeons are critical in two-team approaches. Surgical principles such as thoughtful skin incision planning, atraumatic dissection of neck vessels, preservation of draining veins in the neck, preservation of nerves to maximize sensation of the native tissue, atraumatic handling of native mucosa, and communication in planning osteotomies of the mandible and maxilla may help to optimize functional outcomes after reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In two-team approaches to head and neck cancer ablation and free flap reconstruction, a focus on communication, flexibility, and trust between surgeons are of paramount importance. Importantly, the goals of the ablative and reconstructive surgeons are interdependent, yet in our experience, optimal reconstructive outcomes begin with the thoughtful peri-operative decision-making and intraoperative preservation of critical structures by the surgical team.</p>","PeriodicalId":55195,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"331-337"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two-team approaches in modern head and neck oncologic and reconstructive surgery: ablative considerations.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua D Smith, Richard A Raad, Shaum Sridharan, Kevin J Contrera, Seungwon Kim, Jessica H Maxwell, Steven B Chinn, Jose P Zevallos, Matthew E Spector\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOO.0000000000001080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Two-team approaches to head and neck cancer ablation and free flap reconstruction now occur concurrently in most centers. While the functional outcomes after head and neck ablation and reconstruction are typically examined through the lens of the reconstructive surgeon, optimizing the patient's functional outcome requires careful considerations of the entire surgical team. This review summarizes important intraoperative considerations for decision making by the surgical team, with a particular emphasis on ablative considerations, to optimize reconstructive outcomes after tumor extirpation.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Intraoperatively, dynamic and deliberate communication between the ablative and reconstructive surgeons are critical in two-team approaches. Surgical principles such as thoughtful skin incision planning, atraumatic dissection of neck vessels, preservation of draining veins in the neck, preservation of nerves to maximize sensation of the native tissue, atraumatic handling of native mucosa, and communication in planning osteotomies of the mandible and maxilla may help to optimize functional outcomes after reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In two-team approaches to head and neck cancer ablation and free flap reconstruction, a focus on communication, flexibility, and trust between surgeons are of paramount importance. Importantly, the goals of the ablative and reconstructive surgeons are interdependent, yet in our experience, optimal reconstructive outcomes begin with the thoughtful peri-operative decision-making and intraoperative preservation of critical structures by the surgical team.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"331-337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000001080\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000001080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Two-team approaches in modern head and neck oncologic and reconstructive surgery: ablative considerations.
Purpose of review: Two-team approaches to head and neck cancer ablation and free flap reconstruction now occur concurrently in most centers. While the functional outcomes after head and neck ablation and reconstruction are typically examined through the lens of the reconstructive surgeon, optimizing the patient's functional outcome requires careful considerations of the entire surgical team. This review summarizes important intraoperative considerations for decision making by the surgical team, with a particular emphasis on ablative considerations, to optimize reconstructive outcomes after tumor extirpation.
Recent findings: Intraoperatively, dynamic and deliberate communication between the ablative and reconstructive surgeons are critical in two-team approaches. Surgical principles such as thoughtful skin incision planning, atraumatic dissection of neck vessels, preservation of draining veins in the neck, preservation of nerves to maximize sensation of the native tissue, atraumatic handling of native mucosa, and communication in planning osteotomies of the mandible and maxilla may help to optimize functional outcomes after reconstruction.
Summary: In two-team approaches to head and neck cancer ablation and free flap reconstruction, a focus on communication, flexibility, and trust between surgeons are of paramount importance. Importantly, the goals of the ablative and reconstructive surgeons are interdependent, yet in our experience, optimal reconstructive outcomes begin with the thoughtful peri-operative decision-making and intraoperative preservation of critical structures by the surgical team.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including maxillofacial surgery, head and neck oncology and speech therapy and rehabilitation – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.