跨越年度会议表:评估药学教职员工对COEPA评估策略的理解。

IF 3.5 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Melissa S. Medina , Ashley N. Castleberry , Mike Fulford , Justine Gortney , Kashelle Lockman , Jill Augustine
{"title":"跨越年度会议表:评估药学教职员工对COEPA评估策略的理解。","authors":"Melissa S. Medina ,&nbsp;Ashley N. Castleberry ,&nbsp;Mike Fulford ,&nbsp;Justine Gortney ,&nbsp;Kashelle Lockman ,&nbsp;Jill Augustine","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess pharmacy educators' knowledge and perceptions of Curricular Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities (COEPA) and Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2025 assessment strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants at a session at the 2024 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy completed a Padlet activity with open-ended responses to 2 items. No participant demographic data was collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results from the session revealed that most participants are seeking efficient processes to collect and assess data at the individual student level while ensuring that the curriculum integrates all components of COEPA and ACPE Standards 2025. Careful attention is being paid to skills development and entrustable professional activities implementation across various learning environments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study underscores both the enthusiasm and uncertainty surrounding COEPA and ACPE Standards 2025 implementation. There is a clear desire for more collaborative discussions, where participants can exchange resources and refine best practices. The COEPA-CaBANA collection of articles in the <em>American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education</em> is a method to encourage these collaborations. By sharing implementation strategies and best practices, stakeholders can move closer toward a coherent plan for meeting the new standards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 10","pages":"Article 101495"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Across the Annual Meeting Tables: Evaluating Pharmacy Faculty Members’ Understanding of COEPA Assessment Strategies\",\"authors\":\"Melissa S. Medina ,&nbsp;Ashley N. Castleberry ,&nbsp;Mike Fulford ,&nbsp;Justine Gortney ,&nbsp;Kashelle Lockman ,&nbsp;Jill Augustine\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess pharmacy educators' knowledge and perceptions of Curricular Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities (COEPA) and Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2025 assessment strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants at a session at the 2024 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy completed a Padlet activity with open-ended responses to 2 items. No participant demographic data was collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results from the session revealed that most participants are seeking efficient processes to collect and assess data at the individual student level while ensuring that the curriculum integrates all components of COEPA and ACPE Standards 2025. Careful attention is being paid to skills development and entrustable professional activities implementation across various learning environments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study underscores both the enthusiasm and uncertainty surrounding COEPA and ACPE Standards 2025 implementation. There is a clear desire for more collaborative discussions, where participants can exchange resources and refine best practices. The COEPA-CaBANA collection of articles in the <em>American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education</em> is a method to encourage these collaborations. By sharing implementation strategies and best practices, stakeholders can move closer toward a coherent plan for meeting the new standards.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\"89 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 101495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925001408\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925001408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估药学教育工作者对课程成果和可委托专业活动(COEPA)和ACPE标准2025评估策略的认识和认知。方法:参加美国药学院协会2024年年会的参与者完成了一项问卷调查,问卷对两个项目进行了开放式回答。没有收集参与者的人口统计数据。结果:会议的结果显示,大多数参与者都在寻求有效的流程来收集和评估学生个体水平的数据,同时确保课程整合了COEPA和ACPE 2025标准的所有组成部分。在各种学习环境中对技能发展和环境保护实施给予了认真的关注。结论:该研究强调了COEPA和ACPE 2025标准实施的热情和不确定性。人们显然希望进行更多的协作性讨论,参与者可以在其中交换资源并改进最佳实践。在AJPE上的COEPA-CaBANA文章集合是鼓励这些合作的一种方法。通过分享实施策略和最佳实践,利益相关者可以更接近一致的计划,以满足新标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Across the Annual Meeting Tables: Evaluating Pharmacy Faculty Members’ Understanding of COEPA Assessment Strategies

Objective

To assess pharmacy educators' knowledge and perceptions of Curricular Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities (COEPA) and Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2025 assessment strategies.

Methods

Participants at a session at the 2024 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy completed a Padlet activity with open-ended responses to 2 items. No participant demographic data was collected.

Results

Results from the session revealed that most participants are seeking efficient processes to collect and assess data at the individual student level while ensuring that the curriculum integrates all components of COEPA and ACPE Standards 2025. Careful attention is being paid to skills development and entrustable professional activities implementation across various learning environments.

Conclusion

The study underscores both the enthusiasm and uncertainty surrounding COEPA and ACPE Standards 2025 implementation. There is a clear desire for more collaborative discussions, where participants can exchange resources and refine best practices. The COEPA-CaBANA collection of articles in the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education is a method to encourage these collaborations. By sharing implementation strategies and best practices, stakeholders can move closer toward a coherent plan for meeting the new standards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信