平衡专业责任和个人福祉,通过专业认同形成的镜头在学术药学。

IF 3.5 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Rebecca Schoen , Sara N. Trovinger , Lindsey M. Childs-Kean , Shareen Y. El-Ibiary , Elizabeth J. Unni
{"title":"平衡专业责任和个人福祉,通过专业认同形成的镜头在学术药学。","authors":"Rebecca Schoen ,&nbsp;Sara N. Trovinger ,&nbsp;Lindsey M. Childs-Kean ,&nbsp;Shareen Y. El-Ibiary ,&nbsp;Elizabeth J. Unni","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Self-care and pharmacist burnout have been at the forefront of pharmacy workforce issues over the last decade and beyond, not excluding academic pharmacists. The Academy has concurrently advocated for the well-being of academicians and learners alike while embracing professional identity formation (PIF) as a central tenet of what it means to be a pharmacist. PIF involves a multifaceted process in which individuals learn and change by adopting core knowledge, skills, values, and beliefs of a specific profession, resulting in the individual thinking, behaving, and feeling like a member of that profession. PIF fosters a critical sense of responsibility in health care professionals to fulfill the covenantal relationship with their patients. As a result, pharmacists, including academic pharmacists, often prioritize their work over themselves. In academic pharmacy, the downstream effects include not only detrimental impacts on personal well-being but also potential modeling of these behaviors to learners during their formative years of PIF, thereby perpetuating a broader culture of burnout in the profession. The purpose of this commentary is to explore how PIF may contribute to pharmacist hesitancy to place personal well-being at the forefront, specifically for academic pharmacists. Additionally, the commentary suggests that PIF represents a missed opportunity to examine this tension between self-care and service with our students. To address this, academicians need to develop and model healthy boundaries and sustainable career practices. These changes could influence academic pharmacy culture and create a healthy pharmacy profession for future generations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 10","pages":"Article 101491"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing Professional Responsibilities and Personal Well-Being Through the Lens of Professional Identity Formation in Academic Pharmacy\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Schoen ,&nbsp;Sara N. Trovinger ,&nbsp;Lindsey M. Childs-Kean ,&nbsp;Shareen Y. El-Ibiary ,&nbsp;Elizabeth J. Unni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Self-care and pharmacist burnout have been at the forefront of pharmacy workforce issues over the last decade and beyond, not excluding academic pharmacists. The Academy has concurrently advocated for the well-being of academicians and learners alike while embracing professional identity formation (PIF) as a central tenet of what it means to be a pharmacist. PIF involves a multifaceted process in which individuals learn and change by adopting core knowledge, skills, values, and beliefs of a specific profession, resulting in the individual thinking, behaving, and feeling like a member of that profession. PIF fosters a critical sense of responsibility in health care professionals to fulfill the covenantal relationship with their patients. As a result, pharmacists, including academic pharmacists, often prioritize their work over themselves. In academic pharmacy, the downstream effects include not only detrimental impacts on personal well-being but also potential modeling of these behaviors to learners during their formative years of PIF, thereby perpetuating a broader culture of burnout in the profession. The purpose of this commentary is to explore how PIF may contribute to pharmacist hesitancy to place personal well-being at the forefront, specifically for academic pharmacists. Additionally, the commentary suggests that PIF represents a missed opportunity to examine this tension between self-care and service with our students. To address this, academicians need to develop and model healthy boundaries and sustainable career practices. These changes could influence academic pharmacy culture and create a healthy pharmacy profession for future generations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\"89 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 101491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925001366\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925001366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自我保健和药剂师倦怠一直在药房劳动力问题的最前沿,在过去的十年和超越,不排除学术药剂师。该学院同时提倡为院士和学习者的福祉,同时拥抱职业身份形成(PIF)作为一个药剂师意味着什么的核心原则。PIF涉及一个多方面的过程,在这个过程中,个人通过采用特定职业的核心知识、技能、价值观和信仰来学习和改变,从而使个人的思维、行为和感觉像该职业的一员。PIF在医疗保健专业人员中培养了一种重要的责任感,以履行与患者的契约关系。因此,药剂师,包括学术药剂师,经常优先考虑他们的工作而不是他们自己。在学术药学中,下游效应不仅包括对自我的有害健康影响,还包括在PIF形成时期对学习者的潜在影响,从而在我们的职业中延续更广泛的倦怠文化。本评论的目的是探讨PIF如何可能有助于药剂师犹豫把个人福祉放在前列,特别是学术药剂师。此外,评论认为PIF也错过了与学生探讨自我照顾和服务之间的紧张关系的机会。为了做到这一点,我们作为院士需要发展和示范健康的界限和可持续的职业实践。这些变化可以影响学术药学文化,为后代创造一个健康的药学职业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balancing Professional Responsibilities and Personal Well-Being Through the Lens of Professional Identity Formation in Academic Pharmacy
Self-care and pharmacist burnout have been at the forefront of pharmacy workforce issues over the last decade and beyond, not excluding academic pharmacists. The Academy has concurrently advocated for the well-being of academicians and learners alike while embracing professional identity formation (PIF) as a central tenet of what it means to be a pharmacist. PIF involves a multifaceted process in which individuals learn and change by adopting core knowledge, skills, values, and beliefs of a specific profession, resulting in the individual thinking, behaving, and feeling like a member of that profession. PIF fosters a critical sense of responsibility in health care professionals to fulfill the covenantal relationship with their patients. As a result, pharmacists, including academic pharmacists, often prioritize their work over themselves. In academic pharmacy, the downstream effects include not only detrimental impacts on personal well-being but also potential modeling of these behaviors to learners during their formative years of PIF, thereby perpetuating a broader culture of burnout in the profession. The purpose of this commentary is to explore how PIF may contribute to pharmacist hesitancy to place personal well-being at the forefront, specifically for academic pharmacists. Additionally, the commentary suggests that PIF represents a missed opportunity to examine this tension between self-care and service with our students. To address this, academicians need to develop and model healthy boundaries and sustainable career practices. These changes could influence academic pharmacy culture and create a healthy pharmacy profession for future generations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信