Caroline M. Shubel , Zhuying Zhang , Delesha M. Carpenter
{"title":"标准化病人提供或评估自杀预防培训卫生专业人员:范围审查。","authors":"Caroline M. Shubel , Zhuying Zhang , Delesha M. Carpenter","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Existing reviews on how standardized patients (SPs) have been used to teach suicide prevention skills to health professionals have often been limited to psychiatric nursing. A broader and more in-depth evaluation is needed. The research objective was to explore how SPs have been used to deliver or evaluate suicide prevention training programs for health professionals, particularly pharmacists.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed throughout this scoping review. Titles and abstracts were screened, and eligible articles were reviewed by 2 independent coders, who extracted information on 9 key categories, including trainee type, SP scenario, type of SP, and strengths and limitations of the SP methodology. A total of 65 studies were included. The SP methodology was used widely across health care disciplines, including pharmacists and student pharmacists (<em>n</em> = 12). Strengths to the SP methodology reported in the articles were improving knowledge (<em>n</em> = 12), building trainee confidence (<em>n</em> = 11), and developing and practicing clinical and communication skills (<em>n</em> = 9), among others.</div></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><div>SPs were considered an effective way to train health professionals in suicide prevention skills. Tailored SP scenarios, informed by people with lived experience of suicidal ideation or suicide attempts, which reflect common pharmacist interactions, can better prepare pharmacists for intervening when patients exhibit suicidal warning signs. Further research is needed to assess the cost-benefit of nonhuman virtual SPs in pharmacy education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 10","pages":"Article 101497"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardized Patients to Deliver or Evaluate Suicide Prevention Trainings for Health Professionals: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Caroline M. Shubel , Zhuying Zhang , Delesha M. Carpenter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Existing reviews on how standardized patients (SPs) have been used to teach suicide prevention skills to health professionals have often been limited to psychiatric nursing. A broader and more in-depth evaluation is needed. The research objective was to explore how SPs have been used to deliver or evaluate suicide prevention training programs for health professionals, particularly pharmacists.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed throughout this scoping review. Titles and abstracts were screened, and eligible articles were reviewed by 2 independent coders, who extracted information on 9 key categories, including trainee type, SP scenario, type of SP, and strengths and limitations of the SP methodology. A total of 65 studies were included. The SP methodology was used widely across health care disciplines, including pharmacists and student pharmacists (<em>n</em> = 12). Strengths to the SP methodology reported in the articles were improving knowledge (<em>n</em> = 12), building trainee confidence (<em>n</em> = 11), and developing and practicing clinical and communication skills (<em>n</em> = 9), among others.</div></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><div>SPs were considered an effective way to train health professionals in suicide prevention skills. Tailored SP scenarios, informed by people with lived experience of suicidal ideation or suicide attempts, which reflect common pharmacist interactions, can better prepare pharmacists for intervening when patients exhibit suicidal warning signs. Further research is needed to assess the cost-benefit of nonhuman virtual SPs in pharmacy education.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\"89 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 101497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925001421\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925001421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Standardized Patients to Deliver or Evaluate Suicide Prevention Trainings for Health Professionals: A Scoping Review
Objective
Existing reviews on how standardized patients (SPs) have been used to teach suicide prevention skills to health professionals have often been limited to psychiatric nursing. A broader and more in-depth evaluation is needed. The research objective was to explore how SPs have been used to deliver or evaluate suicide prevention training programs for health professionals, particularly pharmacists.
Findings
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed throughout this scoping review. Titles and abstracts were screened, and eligible articles were reviewed by 2 independent coders, who extracted information on 9 key categories, including trainee type, SP scenario, type of SP, and strengths and limitations of the SP methodology. A total of 65 studies were included. The SP methodology was used widely across health care disciplines, including pharmacists and student pharmacists (n = 12). Strengths to the SP methodology reported in the articles were improving knowledge (n = 12), building trainee confidence (n = 11), and developing and practicing clinical and communication skills (n = 9), among others.
Summary
SPs were considered an effective way to train health professionals in suicide prevention skills. Tailored SP scenarios, informed by people with lived experience of suicidal ideation or suicide attempts, which reflect common pharmacist interactions, can better prepare pharmacists for intervening when patients exhibit suicidal warning signs. Further research is needed to assess the cost-benefit of nonhuman virtual SPs in pharmacy education.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.