在跑步机上,氧气摄取、地面反作用力和运动学对空气阻力和牵伸的反应。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jared R Steele, Luke VanKeersbilck, Dustin Bruening, Jayson Gifford, Matthew Seeley, Iain Hunter
{"title":"在跑步机上,氧气摄取、地面反作用力和运动学对空气阻力和牵伸的反应。","authors":"Jared R Steele, Luke VanKeersbilck, Dustin Bruening, Jayson Gifford, Matthew Seeley, Iain Hunter","doi":"10.1123/jab.2024-0316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the effects of air resistance and drafting on oxygen uptake, ground reaction forces, and lower body kinematics during treadmill running. Thirty-three trained distance runners ran at 3.35 to 4.29 m/s (80%-85% of critical speed) on a force-instrumented treadmill within a wind tunnel under 5 conditions: no fan (NF), normal wind, normal wind with drafting, headwind (HW), and HW with drafting. Drafting involved running 1 m behind a mannequin. Oxygen uptake increased by 4.7% in HW compared with NF (P < .001) and decreased by 2.8% in HW with drafting compared with HW (P < .001). HW increased both braking and propulsive forces, accompanied by greater hip and knee flexion at initial contact, compared with NF. Drafting mitigated these effects but did not return oxygen uptake or biomechanical metrics to NF levels. Results suggest that air resistance imposes a metabolic cost, while drafting reduces but does no eliminate this cost. The most notable biomechanical adaptations occurred in horizontal ground reaction forces and lower body kinematics, indicating that both are influential in the metabolic response to air resistance. Future research should refine experimental setups to further explore air resistance's effects on biomechanics and energy cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":54883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Oxygen Uptake, Ground Reaction Forces, and Kinematics Respond to Air Resistance and Drafting During Treadmill Running.\",\"authors\":\"Jared R Steele, Luke VanKeersbilck, Dustin Bruening, Jayson Gifford, Matthew Seeley, Iain Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jab.2024-0316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated the effects of air resistance and drafting on oxygen uptake, ground reaction forces, and lower body kinematics during treadmill running. Thirty-three trained distance runners ran at 3.35 to 4.29 m/s (80%-85% of critical speed) on a force-instrumented treadmill within a wind tunnel under 5 conditions: no fan (NF), normal wind, normal wind with drafting, headwind (HW), and HW with drafting. Drafting involved running 1 m behind a mannequin. Oxygen uptake increased by 4.7% in HW compared with NF (P < .001) and decreased by 2.8% in HW with drafting compared with HW (P < .001). HW increased both braking and propulsive forces, accompanied by greater hip and knee flexion at initial contact, compared with NF. Drafting mitigated these effects but did not return oxygen uptake or biomechanical metrics to NF levels. Results suggest that air resistance imposes a metabolic cost, while drafting reduces but does no eliminate this cost. The most notable biomechanical adaptations occurred in horizontal ground reaction forces and lower body kinematics, indicating that both are influential in the metabolic response to air resistance. Future research should refine experimental setups to further explore air resistance's effects on biomechanics and energy cost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2024-0316\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2024-0316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究调查了空气阻力和牵伸对跑步机上氧气吸收量、地面反作用力和下半身运动学的影响。33名经过训练的长跑运动员在风洞内的力测量跑步机上以3.35 - 4.29米/秒(临界速度的80%-85%)的速度在5种条件下跑步:无风扇(NF)、正常风、正常风带牵伸、逆风(HW)和HW带牵伸。在模特后面跑1米。与无牵引力组相比,高牵引力组的摄氧量增加了4.7% (P < 0.001),高牵引力组的摄氧量下降了2.8% (P < 0.001)。与NF相比,HW增加了制动力和推进力,并在初始接触时伴有更大的髋关节和膝关节屈曲。牵伸减轻了这些影响,但没有将摄氧量或生物力学指标恢复到NF水平。结果表明,空气阻力施加代谢成本,而起草减少,但不消除这种成本。最显著的生物力学适应发生在水平地面反作用力和下体运动学方面,表明两者都影响对空气阻力的代谢反应。未来的研究应完善实验设置,以进一步探索空气阻力对生物力学和能量成本的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Oxygen Uptake, Ground Reaction Forces, and Kinematics Respond to Air Resistance and Drafting During Treadmill Running.

This study investigated the effects of air resistance and drafting on oxygen uptake, ground reaction forces, and lower body kinematics during treadmill running. Thirty-three trained distance runners ran at 3.35 to 4.29 m/s (80%-85% of critical speed) on a force-instrumented treadmill within a wind tunnel under 5 conditions: no fan (NF), normal wind, normal wind with drafting, headwind (HW), and HW with drafting. Drafting involved running 1 m behind a mannequin. Oxygen uptake increased by 4.7% in HW compared with NF (P < .001) and decreased by 2.8% in HW with drafting compared with HW (P < .001). HW increased both braking and propulsive forces, accompanied by greater hip and knee flexion at initial contact, compared with NF. Drafting mitigated these effects but did not return oxygen uptake or biomechanical metrics to NF levels. Results suggest that air resistance imposes a metabolic cost, while drafting reduces but does no eliminate this cost. The most notable biomechanical adaptations occurred in horizontal ground reaction forces and lower body kinematics, indicating that both are influential in the metabolic response to air resistance. Future research should refine experimental setups to further explore air resistance's effects on biomechanics and energy cost.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Journal of Applied Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Applied Biomechanics (JAB) is to disseminate the highest quality peer-reviewed studies that utilize biomechanical strategies to advance the study of human movement. Areas of interest include clinical biomechanics, gait and posture mechanics, musculoskeletal and neuromuscular biomechanics, sport mechanics, and biomechanical modeling. Studies of sport performance that explicitly generalize to broader activities, contribute substantially to fundamental understanding of human motion, or are in a sport that enjoys wide participation, are welcome. Also within the scope of JAB are studies using biomechanical strategies to investigate the structure, control, function, and state (health and disease) of animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信