Jared R Steele, Luke VanKeersbilck, Dustin Bruening, Jayson Gifford, Matthew Seeley, Iain Hunter
{"title":"在跑步机上,氧气摄取、地面反作用力和运动学对空气阻力和牵伸的反应。","authors":"Jared R Steele, Luke VanKeersbilck, Dustin Bruening, Jayson Gifford, Matthew Seeley, Iain Hunter","doi":"10.1123/jab.2024-0316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the effects of air resistance and drafting on oxygen uptake, ground reaction forces, and lower body kinematics during treadmill running. Thirty-three trained distance runners ran at 3.35 to 4.29 m/s (80%-85% of critical speed) on a force-instrumented treadmill within a wind tunnel under 5 conditions: no fan (NF), normal wind, normal wind with drafting, headwind (HW), and HW with drafting. Drafting involved running 1 m behind a mannequin. Oxygen uptake increased by 4.7% in HW compared with NF (P < .001) and decreased by 2.8% in HW with drafting compared with HW (P < .001). HW increased both braking and propulsive forces, accompanied by greater hip and knee flexion at initial contact, compared with NF. Drafting mitigated these effects but did not return oxygen uptake or biomechanical metrics to NF levels. Results suggest that air resistance imposes a metabolic cost, while drafting reduces but does no eliminate this cost. The most notable biomechanical adaptations occurred in horizontal ground reaction forces and lower body kinematics, indicating that both are influential in the metabolic response to air resistance. Future research should refine experimental setups to further explore air resistance's effects on biomechanics and energy cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":54883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Oxygen Uptake, Ground Reaction Forces, and Kinematics Respond to Air Resistance and Drafting During Treadmill Running.\",\"authors\":\"Jared R Steele, Luke VanKeersbilck, Dustin Bruening, Jayson Gifford, Matthew Seeley, Iain Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jab.2024-0316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated the effects of air resistance and drafting on oxygen uptake, ground reaction forces, and lower body kinematics during treadmill running. Thirty-three trained distance runners ran at 3.35 to 4.29 m/s (80%-85% of critical speed) on a force-instrumented treadmill within a wind tunnel under 5 conditions: no fan (NF), normal wind, normal wind with drafting, headwind (HW), and HW with drafting. Drafting involved running 1 m behind a mannequin. Oxygen uptake increased by 4.7% in HW compared with NF (P < .001) and decreased by 2.8% in HW with drafting compared with HW (P < .001). HW increased both braking and propulsive forces, accompanied by greater hip and knee flexion at initial contact, compared with NF. Drafting mitigated these effects but did not return oxygen uptake or biomechanical metrics to NF levels. Results suggest that air resistance imposes a metabolic cost, while drafting reduces but does no eliminate this cost. The most notable biomechanical adaptations occurred in horizontal ground reaction forces and lower body kinematics, indicating that both are influential in the metabolic response to air resistance. Future research should refine experimental setups to further explore air resistance's effects on biomechanics and energy cost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2024-0316\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2024-0316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
How Oxygen Uptake, Ground Reaction Forces, and Kinematics Respond to Air Resistance and Drafting During Treadmill Running.
This study investigated the effects of air resistance and drafting on oxygen uptake, ground reaction forces, and lower body kinematics during treadmill running. Thirty-three trained distance runners ran at 3.35 to 4.29 m/s (80%-85% of critical speed) on a force-instrumented treadmill within a wind tunnel under 5 conditions: no fan (NF), normal wind, normal wind with drafting, headwind (HW), and HW with drafting. Drafting involved running 1 m behind a mannequin. Oxygen uptake increased by 4.7% in HW compared with NF (P < .001) and decreased by 2.8% in HW with drafting compared with HW (P < .001). HW increased both braking and propulsive forces, accompanied by greater hip and knee flexion at initial contact, compared with NF. Drafting mitigated these effects but did not return oxygen uptake or biomechanical metrics to NF levels. Results suggest that air resistance imposes a metabolic cost, while drafting reduces but does no eliminate this cost. The most notable biomechanical adaptations occurred in horizontal ground reaction forces and lower body kinematics, indicating that both are influential in the metabolic response to air resistance. Future research should refine experimental setups to further explore air resistance's effects on biomechanics and energy cost.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Applied Biomechanics (JAB) is to disseminate the highest quality peer-reviewed studies that utilize biomechanical strategies to advance the study of human movement. Areas of interest include clinical biomechanics, gait and posture mechanics, musculoskeletal and neuromuscular biomechanics, sport mechanics, and biomechanical modeling. Studies of sport performance that explicitly generalize to broader activities, contribute substantially to fundamental understanding of human motion, or are in a sport that enjoys wide participation, are welcome. Also within the scope of JAB are studies using biomechanical strategies to investigate the structure, control, function, and state (health and disease) of animals.