当正面朝上时:垂直注意偏差跟踪直立和倒立图像的交互特征规律。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Matthew D Langley, Madelaine T Vu, Michael K McBeath
{"title":"当正面朝上时:垂直注意偏差跟踪直立和倒立图像的交互特征规律。","authors":"Matthew D Langley, Madelaine T Vu, Michael K McBeath","doi":"10.3758/s13414-025-03148-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We previously proposed a Vertical Attention Bias (VAB) that directs attention toward object tops and scene bottoms and robustly confirmed this effect in both adults and 4- to 7-year-old children. Our past findings are consistent with progressive ecological theory, and support that our perceptual biases are coupled to informative environmental regularities. This leads observers to generally favor a downward gaze to facilitate attending more to functionally and behaviorally relevant locations. Here, we examine orientation effects using upright or inverted images presented in triptych sets to further test the overall VAB pattern. Participants made similarity judgments between a central target image of an object or scene and flanking images containing either the same top-half or the same bottom-half as the target image. Experiment 1 presented upright triptych images and replicated past VAB findings. Experiment 2 presented the same triptychs in an inverted orientation. In this context, the environmental regularity of interactive feature placement is incongruent with conventional spatial location in the presented image. Here object and scene tops are positioned in the lower image portion, and bottoms in the upper image portion. Results extend previous findings and confirm that VAB effects favoring object tops and scene bottoms flip along with the inverted image, though statistically weaker. Taken together, the findings support that the typical vertical interactive feature imbalance in real-world stimuli drives a generic downward vantage tendency. This directs attention toward the locations of meaningful, behaviorally relevant environmental aspects, which helps focus attention on personal action space and body-level affordances.</p>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When right side up is upside down: Vertical attention bias tracks interactive feature regularities in upright and inverted images.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew D Langley, Madelaine T Vu, Michael K McBeath\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13414-025-03148-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We previously proposed a Vertical Attention Bias (VAB) that directs attention toward object tops and scene bottoms and robustly confirmed this effect in both adults and 4- to 7-year-old children. Our past findings are consistent with progressive ecological theory, and support that our perceptual biases are coupled to informative environmental regularities. This leads observers to generally favor a downward gaze to facilitate attending more to functionally and behaviorally relevant locations. Here, we examine orientation effects using upright or inverted images presented in triptych sets to further test the overall VAB pattern. Participants made similarity judgments between a central target image of an object or scene and flanking images containing either the same top-half or the same bottom-half as the target image. Experiment 1 presented upright triptych images and replicated past VAB findings. Experiment 2 presented the same triptychs in an inverted orientation. In this context, the environmental regularity of interactive feature placement is incongruent with conventional spatial location in the presented image. Here object and scene tops are positioned in the lower image portion, and bottoms in the upper image portion. Results extend previous findings and confirm that VAB effects favoring object tops and scene bottoms flip along with the inverted image, though statistically weaker. Taken together, the findings support that the typical vertical interactive feature imbalance in real-world stimuli drives a generic downward vantage tendency. This directs attention toward the locations of meaningful, behaviorally relevant environmental aspects, which helps focus attention on personal action space and body-level affordances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Attention Perception & Psychophysics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Attention Perception & Psychophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03148-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03148-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们之前提出了一个垂直注意偏差(VAB),它将注意力引导到物体的顶部和场景的底部,并在成人和4到7岁的儿童中有力地证实了这一效应。我们过去的研究结果与进步生态学理论一致,并支持我们的感知偏差与信息环境规律相关联。这导致观察者通常倾向于向下凝视,以便更多地关注功能和行为相关的位置。在这里,我们使用三联画中呈现的直立或倒置图像来检查方向效应,以进一步测试整体VAB模式。参与者在物体或场景的中心目标图像和包含相同上半部分或下半部分的侧翼图像之间做出相似性判断。实验1呈现直立三联画图像,并复制过去的VAB结果。实验2将相同的三联画倒置呈现。在这种情况下,交互特征放置的环境规律与呈现图像中的常规空间位置不一致。在这里,对象和场景顶部位于下图像部分,底部位于上图像部分。结果扩展了先前的发现,并证实了VAB效应有利于物体顶部和场景底部随着倒立图像翻转,尽管统计上较弱。综上所述,研究结果支持了现实世界刺激中典型的垂直交互特征不平衡驱动了一种普遍的向下优势趋势。这将注意力引向有意义的、与行为相关的环境因素,这有助于将注意力集中在个人行动空间和身体层面的能力上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When right side up is upside down: Vertical attention bias tracks interactive feature regularities in upright and inverted images.

We previously proposed a Vertical Attention Bias (VAB) that directs attention toward object tops and scene bottoms and robustly confirmed this effect in both adults and 4- to 7-year-old children. Our past findings are consistent with progressive ecological theory, and support that our perceptual biases are coupled to informative environmental regularities. This leads observers to generally favor a downward gaze to facilitate attending more to functionally and behaviorally relevant locations. Here, we examine orientation effects using upright or inverted images presented in triptych sets to further test the overall VAB pattern. Participants made similarity judgments between a central target image of an object or scene and flanking images containing either the same top-half or the same bottom-half as the target image. Experiment 1 presented upright triptych images and replicated past VAB findings. Experiment 2 presented the same triptychs in an inverted orientation. In this context, the environmental regularity of interactive feature placement is incongruent with conventional spatial location in the presented image. Here object and scene tops are positioned in the lower image portion, and bottoms in the upper image portion. Results extend previous findings and confirm that VAB effects favoring object tops and scene bottoms flip along with the inverted image, though statistically weaker. Taken together, the findings support that the typical vertical interactive feature imbalance in real-world stimuli drives a generic downward vantage tendency. This directs attention toward the locations of meaningful, behaviorally relevant environmental aspects, which helps focus attention on personal action space and body-level affordances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信