从长期记忆中提取并不能绕过工作记忆。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Michael K P Mugno, Timothy J Vickery
{"title":"从长期记忆中提取并不能绕过工作记忆。","authors":"Michael K P Mugno, Timothy J Vickery","doi":"10.3758/s13414-025-03145-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Information retrieved from long-term memory (LTM) enters working memory (WM), and the amount of information that can be retrieved is constrained to the limits of WM (about three to four items; Fukuda & Woodman, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 (20), 5306-5311, 2017). Can LTM retrieval occur when WM is near capacity, without consequence to either the retrieved or the maintained information? Liu, Li, Theeuwes, and Wang (NeuroImage, 261: 119513, 2022) presented evidence that even when WM is near capacity, LTM items could still be reported. They argue that retrieved LTM items can bypass WM. We investigated this further by introducing continuous reporting of retrieved information and WM contents to their paradigm. If retrieval bypasses WM, then there should be no impairment of report accuracy to either WM contents or LTM-retrieved information. In the first experiment, WM reports suffered when an LTM item was retrieved. In the second, we found that when WM was near capacity (four items), the fidelity of LTM reports suffered compared to when WM was not (two items or no items). Additionally, WM contents were reported with lower fidelity when an LTM item was retrieved compared to a WM-only condition, under both two-item and four-item WM load. We conclude that LTM retrieval does not bypass WM.</p>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrieval from long-term memory does not bypass working memory.\",\"authors\":\"Michael K P Mugno, Timothy J Vickery\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13414-025-03145-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Information retrieved from long-term memory (LTM) enters working memory (WM), and the amount of information that can be retrieved is constrained to the limits of WM (about three to four items; Fukuda & Woodman, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 (20), 5306-5311, 2017). Can LTM retrieval occur when WM is near capacity, without consequence to either the retrieved or the maintained information? Liu, Li, Theeuwes, and Wang (NeuroImage, 261: 119513, 2022) presented evidence that even when WM is near capacity, LTM items could still be reported. They argue that retrieved LTM items can bypass WM. We investigated this further by introducing continuous reporting of retrieved information and WM contents to their paradigm. If retrieval bypasses WM, then there should be no impairment of report accuracy to either WM contents or LTM-retrieved information. In the first experiment, WM reports suffered when an LTM item was retrieved. In the second, we found that when WM was near capacity (four items), the fidelity of LTM reports suffered compared to when WM was not (two items or no items). Additionally, WM contents were reported with lower fidelity when an LTM item was retrieved compared to a WM-only condition, under both two-item and four-item WM load. We conclude that LTM retrieval does not bypass WM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Attention Perception & Psychophysics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Attention Perception & Psychophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03145-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03145-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从长期记忆(LTM)中检索到的信息进入工作记忆(WM),可检索的信息量受到WM的限制(约三到四个项目;Fukuda & Woodman, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(20), 5306-5311, 2017)。当WM接近容量时,是否可以进行LTM检索,而不会对检索或维护的信息造成影响?Liu, Li, Theeuwes和Wang (NeuroImage, 261: 119513,2022)提出证据表明,即使当WM接近容量时,LTM项目仍然可以被报告。他们认为,检索到的LTM项目可以绕过WM。我们通过将检索到的信息和WM内容的连续报告引入他们的范式来进一步研究这一点。如果检索绕过了WM,那么无论WM内容还是ltm检索的信息,都不会损害报告的准确性。在第一个实验中,当检索LTM项目时,WM报告受到影响。第二,我们发现当WM接近容量(四个项目)时,与WM不接近容量(两个项目或没有项目)时相比,LTM报告的保真度受到影响。此外,在两项和四项WM负载下,当检索LTM项目时,与仅检索WM条件相比,报告的WM内容保真度较低。我们得出结论,LTM检索不能绕过WM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrieval from long-term memory does not bypass working memory.

Information retrieved from long-term memory (LTM) enters working memory (WM), and the amount of information that can be retrieved is constrained to the limits of WM (about three to four items; Fukuda & Woodman, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 (20), 5306-5311, 2017). Can LTM retrieval occur when WM is near capacity, without consequence to either the retrieved or the maintained information? Liu, Li, Theeuwes, and Wang (NeuroImage, 261: 119513, 2022) presented evidence that even when WM is near capacity, LTM items could still be reported. They argue that retrieved LTM items can bypass WM. We investigated this further by introducing continuous reporting of retrieved information and WM contents to their paradigm. If retrieval bypasses WM, then there should be no impairment of report accuracy to either WM contents or LTM-retrieved information. In the first experiment, WM reports suffered when an LTM item was retrieved. In the second, we found that when WM was near capacity (four items), the fidelity of LTM reports suffered compared to when WM was not (two items or no items). Additionally, WM contents were reported with lower fidelity when an LTM item was retrieved compared to a WM-only condition, under both two-item and four-item WM load. We conclude that LTM retrieval does not bypass WM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信