Mei Fung Florence Wong, Jasvir Kaur Jessie Dhaliwal, Kong Nam Summer Ha, Wing Yu Winsy Wan, Wai Ying Coco Li
{"title":"护理中的高保真仿真与虚拟技术:独立还是联合?系统评价。","authors":"Mei Fung Florence Wong, Jasvir Kaur Jessie Dhaliwal, Kong Nam Summer Ha, Wing Yu Winsy Wan, Wai Ying Coco Li","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-fidelity simulation (HFS) and virtual technology (VT) are transformative in nursing education, yet their comparative effectiveness and optimal integration remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review evaluated the impact of HFS and VT on nursing students' knowledge and skills, comparing stand-alone and combined approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines, we searched databases (2015-2024) using Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) criteria. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite only 5 qualifying studies, all demonstrated that VT (foundational) followed by HFS (practical) produced optimal results, enhancing knowledge, clinical judgment, and technical skills. HFS best developed psychomotor/teamwork abilities, while VT strengthened theory and self-directed learning. Combined approaches with case-based small groups outperformed single methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HFS and VT are complementary: integrating VT first, then HFS bridges theory to practice effectively. Nurse educators should adopt this dual-modal approach. Future research should assess long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and structured implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-Fidelity Simulation and Virtual Technology in Nursing: Stand-Alone or Combined Approaches? A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Mei Fung Florence Wong, Jasvir Kaur Jessie Dhaliwal, Kong Nam Summer Ha, Wing Yu Winsy Wan, Wai Ying Coco Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-fidelity simulation (HFS) and virtual technology (VT) are transformative in nursing education, yet their comparative effectiveness and optimal integration remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review evaluated the impact of HFS and VT on nursing students' knowledge and skills, comparing stand-alone and combined approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines, we searched databases (2015-2024) using Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) criteria. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite only 5 qualifying studies, all demonstrated that VT (foundational) followed by HFS (practical) produced optimal results, enhancing knowledge, clinical judgment, and technical skills. HFS best developed psychomotor/teamwork abilities, while VT strengthened theory and self-directed learning. Combined approaches with case-based small groups outperformed single methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HFS and VT are complementary: integrating VT first, then HFS bridges theory to practice effectively. Nurse educators should adopt this dual-modal approach. Future research should assess long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and structured implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Educator\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001968\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001968","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
High-Fidelity Simulation and Virtual Technology in Nursing: Stand-Alone or Combined Approaches? A Systematic Review.
Background: High-fidelity simulation (HFS) and virtual technology (VT) are transformative in nursing education, yet their comparative effectiveness and optimal integration remain underexplored.
Purpose: This systematic review evaluated the impact of HFS and VT on nursing students' knowledge and skills, comparing stand-alone and combined approaches.
Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines, we searched databases (2015-2024) using Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) criteria. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality.
Results: Despite only 5 qualifying studies, all demonstrated that VT (foundational) followed by HFS (practical) produced optimal results, enhancing knowledge, clinical judgment, and technical skills. HFS best developed psychomotor/teamwork abilities, while VT strengthened theory and self-directed learning. Combined approaches with case-based small groups outperformed single methods.
Conclusion: HFS and VT are complementary: integrating VT first, then HFS bridges theory to practice effectively. Nurse educators should adopt this dual-modal approach. Future research should assess long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and structured implementation.
期刊介绍:
Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.