护理中的高保真仿真与虚拟技术:独立还是联合?系统评价。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Mei Fung Florence Wong, Jasvir Kaur Jessie Dhaliwal, Kong Nam Summer Ha, Wing Yu Winsy Wan, Wai Ying Coco Li
{"title":"护理中的高保真仿真与虚拟技术:独立还是联合?系统评价。","authors":"Mei Fung Florence Wong, Jasvir Kaur Jessie Dhaliwal, Kong Nam Summer Ha, Wing Yu Winsy Wan, Wai Ying Coco Li","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-fidelity simulation (HFS) and virtual technology (VT) are transformative in nursing education, yet their comparative effectiveness and optimal integration remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review evaluated the impact of HFS and VT on nursing students' knowledge and skills, comparing stand-alone and combined approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines, we searched databases (2015-2024) using Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) criteria. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite only 5 qualifying studies, all demonstrated that VT (foundational) followed by HFS (practical) produced optimal results, enhancing knowledge, clinical judgment, and technical skills. HFS best developed psychomotor/teamwork abilities, while VT strengthened theory and self-directed learning. Combined approaches with case-based small groups outperformed single methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HFS and VT are complementary: integrating VT first, then HFS bridges theory to practice effectively. Nurse educators should adopt this dual-modal approach. Future research should assess long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and structured implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-Fidelity Simulation and Virtual Technology in Nursing: Stand-Alone or Combined Approaches? A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Mei Fung Florence Wong, Jasvir Kaur Jessie Dhaliwal, Kong Nam Summer Ha, Wing Yu Winsy Wan, Wai Ying Coco Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-fidelity simulation (HFS) and virtual technology (VT) are transformative in nursing education, yet their comparative effectiveness and optimal integration remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review evaluated the impact of HFS and VT on nursing students' knowledge and skills, comparing stand-alone and combined approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines, we searched databases (2015-2024) using Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) criteria. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite only 5 qualifying studies, all demonstrated that VT (foundational) followed by HFS (practical) produced optimal results, enhancing knowledge, clinical judgment, and technical skills. HFS best developed psychomotor/teamwork abilities, while VT strengthened theory and self-directed learning. Combined approaches with case-based small groups outperformed single methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HFS and VT are complementary: integrating VT first, then HFS bridges theory to practice effectively. Nurse educators should adopt this dual-modal approach. Future research should assess long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and structured implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Educator\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001968\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001968","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高保真仿真(HFS)和虚拟技术(VT)在护理教育中具有变革性,但它们的比较有效性和最佳整合仍未得到充分探索。目的:本系统评价HFS和VT对护生知识和技能的影响,比较单独和联合方法。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)报告指南的首选报告项目,我们使用人群、干预、比较和结果(PICO)标准检索数据库(2015-2024)。两位审稿人独立筛选研究,提取数据并评估质量。结果:尽管只有5项合格的研究,但所有研究都表明,VT(基础)后HFS(实用)产生了最佳结果,增强了知识、临床判断和技术技能。高强度训练最能培养学生的精神运动/团队合作能力,而高强度训练则强化学生的理论能力和自主学习能力。结合案例小组的方法优于单一方法。结论:HFS与VT是互补的,先整合VT,然后HFS有效地将理论与实践相结合。护士教育者应该采用这种双轨制方法。未来的研究应评估长期结果、成本效益和结构化实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High-Fidelity Simulation and Virtual Technology in Nursing: Stand-Alone or Combined Approaches? A Systematic Review.

Background: High-fidelity simulation (HFS) and virtual technology (VT) are transformative in nursing education, yet their comparative effectiveness and optimal integration remain underexplored.

Purpose: This systematic review evaluated the impact of HFS and VT on nursing students' knowledge and skills, comparing stand-alone and combined approaches.

Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines, we searched databases (2015-2024) using Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) criteria. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality.

Results: Despite only 5 qualifying studies, all demonstrated that VT (foundational) followed by HFS (practical) produced optimal results, enhancing knowledge, clinical judgment, and technical skills. HFS best developed psychomotor/teamwork abilities, while VT strengthened theory and self-directed learning. Combined approaches with case-based small groups outperformed single methods.

Conclusion: HFS and VT are complementary: integrating VT first, then HFS bridges theory to practice effectively. Nurse educators should adopt this dual-modal approach. Future research should assess long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and structured implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Educator
Nurse Educator 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信