初次PCI术后单面血管造影微循环阻力指数:早期myo - amr研究。

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Zhiwen Zhang, Song Ding, Quan Guo, Cao Ma, Fei Lin, Xiaoyu Rao, Qingbo Shi, Yang Gao, Kaiyuan Liu, Haosen Yu, Ming Nie, Chao Liu, Shengli Li, Yuting Gao, Hongjie Gao, Liang Peng, Zhenzhou Zhao, Kang Zhao, Haiyu Tang, Ran You, Min Zhang, Jun Pu, Muwei Li
{"title":"初次PCI术后单面血管造影微循环阻力指数:早期myo - amr研究。","authors":"Zhiwen Zhang, Song Ding, Quan Guo, Cao Ma, Fei Lin, Xiaoyu Rao, Qingbo Shi, Yang Gao, Kaiyuan Liu, Haosen Yu, Ming Nie, Chao Liu, Shengli Li, Yuting Gao, Hongjie Gao, Liang Peng, Zhenzhou Zhao, Kang Zhao, Haiyu Tang, Ran You, Min Zhang, Jun Pu, Muwei Li","doi":"10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) leads to inadequate myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is an intraoperative diagnostic tool for CMD. However, its widespread application is hindered by the requirement for pressure wires and hyperaemic agents. The angiographic microcirculatory resistance (AMR) index is concise, convenient, accurate, and serves as a pressure wire-free alternative to the IMR.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to demonstrate the ability of AMR to detect CMD in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI therapy and to assess its predictive value for long-term prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The EARLY-MYO-AMR trial comprised two cohorts. The derivation cohort included 495 patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI within 12 h and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) within 14 days of symptom onset. The optimal AMR cutoff value for diagnosing CMD using CMR was determined by analysing the receiver operating characteristic curves. The validation cohort enrolled 2,663 patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI within 12 h of symptom onset from January 2012 to April 2022 across 5 medical centres. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiac death, hospitalisation for heart failure, repeat myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The derivation cohort identified an AMR cutoff >26.6 mmHg*s/dm for predicting CMD post-PPCI (area under the curve 0.721, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.677-0.763). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that AMR >26.6 mmHg*s/dm was a CMD risk factor (odds ratio 4.10, 95% CI: 2.56-6.56; p<0.001). The MACE incidence was significantly higher among patients in the validation cohort with AMR >26.6 mmHg*s/dm than among those with AMR ≤26.6 mmHg*s/dm (30.9% vs 21.5%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.47, 95% CI: 1.20-1.80; p<0.001). MACE incidence increased with AMR, with an adjusted HR of 1.30 (95% CI: 1.17-1.46; p<0.001) per 10 mmHg*s/dm increase. The Bland-Altman and Kappa analyses showed good intra- and interobserver agreement for AMR (intraobserver: bias=-0.104, k=0.914; interobserver: bias=-0.032, k=0.958).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AMR >26.6 mmHg*s/dm predicts CMD during PPCI and increased MACE incidence in patients with STEMI. This convenient tool helps in risk stratification and treatment guidance for STEMI prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54378,"journal":{"name":"Eurointervention","volume":"21 17","pages":"e1015-e1027"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378629/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-view angiographic microcirculatory resistance index after primary PCI: the EARLY-MYO-AMR study.\",\"authors\":\"Zhiwen Zhang, Song Ding, Quan Guo, Cao Ma, Fei Lin, Xiaoyu Rao, Qingbo Shi, Yang Gao, Kaiyuan Liu, Haosen Yu, Ming Nie, Chao Liu, Shengli Li, Yuting Gao, Hongjie Gao, Liang Peng, Zhenzhou Zhao, Kang Zhao, Haiyu Tang, Ran You, Min Zhang, Jun Pu, Muwei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) leads to inadequate myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is an intraoperative diagnostic tool for CMD. However, its widespread application is hindered by the requirement for pressure wires and hyperaemic agents. The angiographic microcirculatory resistance (AMR) index is concise, convenient, accurate, and serves as a pressure wire-free alternative to the IMR.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to demonstrate the ability of AMR to detect CMD in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI therapy and to assess its predictive value for long-term prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The EARLY-MYO-AMR trial comprised two cohorts. The derivation cohort included 495 patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI within 12 h and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) within 14 days of symptom onset. The optimal AMR cutoff value for diagnosing CMD using CMR was determined by analysing the receiver operating characteristic curves. The validation cohort enrolled 2,663 patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI within 12 h of symptom onset from January 2012 to April 2022 across 5 medical centres. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiac death, hospitalisation for heart failure, repeat myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The derivation cohort identified an AMR cutoff >26.6 mmHg*s/dm for predicting CMD post-PPCI (area under the curve 0.721, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.677-0.763). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that AMR >26.6 mmHg*s/dm was a CMD risk factor (odds ratio 4.10, 95% CI: 2.56-6.56; p<0.001). The MACE incidence was significantly higher among patients in the validation cohort with AMR >26.6 mmHg*s/dm than among those with AMR ≤26.6 mmHg*s/dm (30.9% vs 21.5%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.47, 95% CI: 1.20-1.80; p<0.001). MACE incidence increased with AMR, with an adjusted HR of 1.30 (95% CI: 1.17-1.46; p<0.001) per 10 mmHg*s/dm increase. The Bland-Altman and Kappa analyses showed good intra- and interobserver agreement for AMR (intraobserver: bias=-0.104, k=0.914; interobserver: bias=-0.032, k=0.958).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AMR >26.6 mmHg*s/dm predicts CMD during PPCI and increased MACE incidence in patients with STEMI. This convenient tool helps in risk stratification and treatment guidance for STEMI prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurointervention\",\"volume\":\"21 17\",\"pages\":\"e1015-e1027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378629/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurointervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00952\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00952","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者行初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)时,冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD)导致心肌灌注不足。微循环阻力指数(IMR)是CMD的术中诊断工具。然而,它的广泛应用受到压力导线和充血剂的要求的阻碍。血管造影微循环阻力(AMR)指数简洁、方便、准确,可作为IMR的无压力导线替代方法。目的:本研究旨在证明AMR在接受PPCI治疗的STEMI患者中检测CMD的能力,并评估其对长期预后的预测价值。方法:早期myo - amr试验包括两个队列。衍生队列包括495例STEMI患者,这些患者在症状出现后12小时内接受PPCI和14天内接受心脏磁共振(CMR)检查。通过分析受者工作特征曲线,确定CMR诊断CMD的最佳AMR截止值。验证队列纳入了2012年1月至2022年4月5个医疗中心的2663名STEMI患者,这些患者在症状出现后12小时内接受了PPCI。所有患者均随访至少1年。主要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生,包括心源性死亡、心力衰竭住院、重复心肌梗死和靶病变血运重建。结果:衍生队列确定了预测ppci后CMD的AMR截断值为26.6 mmHg*s/dm(曲线下面积0.721,95%置信区间[CI]: 0.677-0.763)。多变量logistic回归分析显示,AMR >26.6 mmHg*s/dm是一个CMD的危险因素(优势比4.10,95% CI: 2.56 ~ 6.56; AMR≤26.6 mmHg*s/dm比AMR≤26.6 mmHg*s/dm (30.9% vs 21.5%,校正风险比[HR] 1.47, 95% CI: 1.20 ~ 1.80)。结论:AMR >26.6 mmHg*s/dm可预测STEMI患者PPCI期间的CMD和MACE发生率增加。这种便捷的工具有助于STEMI预后的风险分层和治疗指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-view angiographic microcirculatory resistance index after primary PCI: the EARLY-MYO-AMR study.

Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) leads to inadequate myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is an intraoperative diagnostic tool for CMD. However, its widespread application is hindered by the requirement for pressure wires and hyperaemic agents. The angiographic microcirculatory resistance (AMR) index is concise, convenient, accurate, and serves as a pressure wire-free alternative to the IMR.

Aims: This study aimed to demonstrate the ability of AMR to detect CMD in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI therapy and to assess its predictive value for long-term prognosis.

Methods: The EARLY-MYO-AMR trial comprised two cohorts. The derivation cohort included 495 patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI within 12 h and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) within 14 days of symptom onset. The optimal AMR cutoff value for diagnosing CMD using CMR was determined by analysing the receiver operating characteristic curves. The validation cohort enrolled 2,663 patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI within 12 h of symptom onset from January 2012 to April 2022 across 5 medical centres. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiac death, hospitalisation for heart failure, repeat myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularisation.

Results: The derivation cohort identified an AMR cutoff >26.6 mmHg*s/dm for predicting CMD post-PPCI (area under the curve 0.721, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.677-0.763). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that AMR >26.6 mmHg*s/dm was a CMD risk factor (odds ratio 4.10, 95% CI: 2.56-6.56; p<0.001). The MACE incidence was significantly higher among patients in the validation cohort with AMR >26.6 mmHg*s/dm than among those with AMR ≤26.6 mmHg*s/dm (30.9% vs 21.5%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.47, 95% CI: 1.20-1.80; p<0.001). MACE incidence increased with AMR, with an adjusted HR of 1.30 (95% CI: 1.17-1.46; p<0.001) per 10 mmHg*s/dm increase. The Bland-Altman and Kappa analyses showed good intra- and interobserver agreement for AMR (intraobserver: bias=-0.104, k=0.914; interobserver: bias=-0.032, k=0.958).

Conclusions: AMR >26.6 mmHg*s/dm predicts CMD during PPCI and increased MACE incidence in patients with STEMI. This convenient tool helps in risk stratification and treatment guidance for STEMI prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eurointervention
Eurointervention CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: EuroIntervention Journal is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal whose aim is to create a community of high quality research and education in the field of percutaneous and surgical cardiovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信