原核生物和微真核生物基于dna的分类研究。

IF 16.3 2区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Leho Tedersoo, Stefan Geisen, Ying Chang, R Henrik Nilsson
{"title":"原核生物和微真核生物基于dna的分类研究。","authors":"Leho Tedersoo, Stefan Geisen, Ying Chang, R Henrik Nilsson","doi":"10.1016/j.tig.2025.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current nomenclatural rules regulating the naming of microorganisms are too conservative from the perspective of recent developments in molecular genetics tools and organism discovery. The taxonomy of microorganisms would greatly benefit from a conceptual shift toward DNA-based approaches. Current informal practices of DNA-based taxonomy include the use of DNA sequences for species description and type material. Here, we analyze the pros and cons of DNA-based taxonomic approaches and propose guidelines and examples for their appropriate use in descriptions of species and higher-ranking taxa. To facilitate taxon description and communication, we call for a broader use of DNA samples, genome and genetic marker sequences in typifying and diagnosing species and higher-ranking taxa if physical voucher strains or specimens are unavailable.</p>","PeriodicalId":54413,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward DNA-based taxonomy of prokaryotes and microeukaryotes.\",\"authors\":\"Leho Tedersoo, Stefan Geisen, Ying Chang, R Henrik Nilsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tig.2025.07.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current nomenclatural rules regulating the naming of microorganisms are too conservative from the perspective of recent developments in molecular genetics tools and organism discovery. The taxonomy of microorganisms would greatly benefit from a conceptual shift toward DNA-based approaches. Current informal practices of DNA-based taxonomy include the use of DNA sequences for species description and type material. Here, we analyze the pros and cons of DNA-based taxonomic approaches and propose guidelines and examples for their appropriate use in descriptions of species and higher-ranking taxa. To facilitate taxon description and communication, we call for a broader use of DNA samples, genome and genetic marker sequences in typifying and diagnosing species and higher-ranking taxa if physical voucher strains or specimens are unavailable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2025.07.009\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2025.07.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从分子遗传学工具和生物发现的最新发展来看,目前规范微生物命名的命名规则过于保守。微生物的分类学将极大地受益于以dna为基础的方法的概念转变。目前基于DNA的分类的非正式实践包括使用DNA序列进行物种描述和类型材料。在此,我们分析了基于dna的分类方法的优缺点,并提出了在物种和高级分类群描述中适当使用dna分类方法的准则和例子。为了促进分类单元的描述和交流,我们呼吁在没有实物样本或标本的情况下,更广泛地使用DNA样本、基因组和遗传标记序列对物种和高级分类单元进行分型和诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward DNA-based taxonomy of prokaryotes and microeukaryotes.

The current nomenclatural rules regulating the naming of microorganisms are too conservative from the perspective of recent developments in molecular genetics tools and organism discovery. The taxonomy of microorganisms would greatly benefit from a conceptual shift toward DNA-based approaches. Current informal practices of DNA-based taxonomy include the use of DNA sequences for species description and type material. Here, we analyze the pros and cons of DNA-based taxonomic approaches and propose guidelines and examples for their appropriate use in descriptions of species and higher-ranking taxa. To facilitate taxon description and communication, we call for a broader use of DNA samples, genome and genetic marker sequences in typifying and diagnosing species and higher-ranking taxa if physical voucher strains or specimens are unavailable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Genetics
Trends in Genetics 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
0.90%
发文量
160
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Launched in 1985, Trends in Genetics swiftly established itself as a "must-read" for geneticists, offering concise, accessible articles covering a spectrum of topics from developmental biology to evolution. This reputation endures, making TiG a cherished resource in the genetic research community. While evolving with the field, the journal now embraces new areas like genomics, epigenetics, and computational genetics, alongside its continued coverage of traditional subjects such as transcriptional regulation, population genetics, and chromosome biology. Despite expanding its scope, the core objective of TiG remains steadfast: to furnish researchers and students with high-quality, innovative reviews, commentaries, and discussions, fostering an appreciation for advances in genetic research. Each issue of TiG presents lively and up-to-date Reviews and Opinions, alongside shorter articles like Science & Society and Spotlight pieces. Invited from leading researchers, Reviews objectively chronicle recent developments, Opinions provide a forum for debate and hypothesis, and shorter articles explore the intersection of genetics with science and policy, as well as emerging ideas in the field. All articles undergo rigorous peer-review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信